.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 44 of 67 FirstFirst ... 34 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 54 ... LastLast
Results 1,076 to 1,100 of 1674

Thread: 2024 Offseason Thread

  1. #1076
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!! donato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,685
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelifan View Post
    This is another reason I don't like the murray move first. They've committed additional salary with the Murray deal.

    It's likely whatever happens with Ingram or CJ opens up room under the tax, but with uncertainty that it will, the Pelicans have to resolve the Ingram/McCollum situation before they even can start thinking about free agency.
    NOLA isn't a free agent destination anyway. We were never going to be big players in free agency. It's fine the way it's playing out IMO.

  2. #1077
    Isn?t it concerning to anyone that we have no starting 5?

  3. #1078
    Quote Originally Posted by WhyHornetsWhy View Post
    Isn?t it concerning to anyone that we have no starting 5?
    Patience? The Pels are about to get one. Probably Isaiah Stewart?

    Pistons get:
    2026 Kings 1st rounder

    Kings get:
    Brandon Ingram

    Pels get:
    Harrison Barnes
    Isaiah Stewart
    Devon Carter
    2025 2nd round pick from Trailblazers via Kings
    2028 1st round pick from Kings

    thoughts?
    Last edited by Darkhorse985; 06-30-2024 at 10:26 PM.

  4. #1079
    Quote Originally Posted by donato View Post
    NOLA isn't a free agent destination anyway. We were never going to be big players in free agency. It's fine the way it's playing out IMO.
    It's not about being big players, it's about the fact Nola can't even consider working out sign and trades, matching Jonas or naji offers, or using their MLE until they free up more money, because it they commit any more money now they put restraints on what kind of Ingram trades they can make.

  5. #1080
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelifan View Post
    This is another reason I don't like the murray move first. They've committed additional salary with the Murray deal.

    It's likely whatever happens with Ingram or CJ opens up room under the tax, but with uncertainty that it will, the Pelicans have to resolve the Ingram/McCollum situation before they even can start thinking about free agency.
    The Murray move has not been made yet and does not impact free agency.
    Basketball.

  6. #1081
    CP on the Spurs would be scary even at cp age. That'll be a good move on they're behalf. A year 2 Wemby is already scary to think about.

  7. #1082
    Quote Originally Posted by Nichols View Post
    Salary cap question.. So even if Ingram takes a slight pay cut, we can't keep Trey unless CJ is offloaded?
    Pretty much. Assuming an extension for Trey around $30m (which wouldn't be unusual, rookie scale extensions can be considerably more expensive than that) and a 'slight' pay cut for Ingram coming out at about $42m per year (in line with OG's extension) then we'd be pretty much in the luxury tax just rostering CJ, Dejounte, Trey, Herb, Zion, and BI with nobody else on the team.

  8. #1083
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkhorse985 View Post
    Patience? The Pels are about to get one. Probably Isaiah Stewart?

    Pistons get:
    2026 Kings 1st rounder

    Kings get:
    Brandon Ingram

    Pels get:
    Harrison Barnes
    Isaiah Stewart
    Devon Carter
    2025 2nd round pick from Trailblazers via Kings
    2028 1st round pick from Kings
    That would be a good trade.

    I like Stewart.

    Not so sure how he’ll work with Z on court

  9. #1084
    The Franchise
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Long Beach
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    Pretty much. Assuming an extension for Trey around $30m (which wouldn't be unusual, rookie scale extensions can be considerably more expensive than that) and a 'slight' pay cut for Ingram coming out at about $42m per year (in line with OG's extension) then we'd be pretty much in the luxury tax just rostering CJ, Dejounte, Trey, Herb, Zion, and BI with nobody else on the team.
    I see.. thanks.

  10. #1085
    Who was that poster on here that wanted Barnes years ago? His dream might come true

  11. #1086
    The Franchise
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Long Beach
    Posts
    1,663
    So from what I gather.. Even if Ingram played in a more efficient manner, his contract would still present problems for filling out a competitive complete roster, considering ownership will not pay a luxury tax.

  12. #1087
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    The Murray move has not been made yet and does not impact free agency.
    but it's still committed money. The pelicans CAN DO whatever they want as long as they don't trigger the hard cap, but they won't because they don't want to be threatened with the possibility of paying the tax. They'll want to free up money before they commit anything more.
    Last edited by Pelifan; 06-30-2024 at 10:38 PM.

  13. #1088
    Quote Originally Posted by Nichols View Post
    So from what I gather.. Even if Ingram played in a more efficient manner, his contract would still present problems for filling out a competitive complete roster, considering ownership will not pay a luxury tax.
    Pretty much, it would make things difficult. You'd have to get rid of CJ next season - you could keep him into next year but the year after when Trey's contract extension kicks in, he'd have to be out the door and you couldn't take back any long-term salary for it.

    And the rest of the team would have to be made of minimum contracts and MLE stuff.

  14. #1089
    Unless CJ takes a pay cut?

    I would hate to lose him

  15. #1090
    The Franchise
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Long Beach
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    Pretty much, it would make things difficult. You'd have to get rid of CJ next season - you could keep him into next year but the year after when Trey's contract extension kicks in, he'd have to be out the door and you couldn't take back any long-term salary for it.

    And the rest of the team would have to be made of minimum contracts and MLE stuff.
    Depressing..

  16. #1091
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!! donato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,685
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkhorse985 View Post
    Patience? The Pels are about to get one. Probably Isaiah Stewart?

    Pistons get:
    2026 Kings 1st rounder

    Kings get:
    Brandon Ingram

    Pels get:
    Harrison Barnes
    Isaiah Stewart
    Devon Carter
    2025 2nd round pick from Trailblazers via Kings
    2028 1st round pick from Kings

    thoughts?
    I'd be more than fine with it. Puts us in good cap $ situation and CJ is coming off the books in 2 years (at the latest) anyway. Carter could turn into something special. Stewart doesn't scream high end big, but he's better than what we got and can shoot some. Barnes is solid.

    If I could edit it, I'd rather trade the first going to Detroit and the first coming to us for Kessler.

  17. #1092
    Quote Originally Posted by Nichols View Post
    Depressing..
    It's a rough situation. Honestly, the second apron stuff is almost a hard cap as well, so even if the Pels ever decided to go into the tax the flexibility when working with salary that high has been cratered. It's worse than it's ever been.

  18. #1093

  19. #1094
    The Franchise
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Long Beach
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    It's a rough situation. Honestly, the second apron stuff is almost a hard cap as well, so even if the Pels ever decided to go into the tax the flexibility when working with salary that high has been cratered. It's worse than it's ever been.
    That's two major handicaps for this team. It's not a free agent destination, and the ownership won't pay a luxury tax. You have no choice but to push all your chips in on Zion and hope he wills this team over the edge with those limitations. That also has its limitations, he's a generational talent. If ownership doesn't create an environment personnel wise that at least gives him a chance to make a title push I don't think he's going to stick around. I could be wrong but he just didn't seem enthused to me until the Pel's made noise in the playoffs last season. I'll remain optimistic in spite of all that.. beating the odds and pushing teams we aren't supposed to is what makes this team fun to watch.

  20. #1095
    I know he was shooting lights out last year, but I do not think we should start CJ. In all sincerity i dont want him in there at the end either. Perhaps im crazy but there were so many games where he would try and do too much resulting in a turnover and then get hunted down and scored on at the other end. Trey Murphy and undoubtedly Herb Jones must be starters. Id like to think Hawkins could provide a lot of CJ does as well.

    he's way overpaid , trade em,


    what would it take to get walker kessler considering he only makes 5m?
    Last edited by fullcourtpress; 06-30-2024 at 11:36 PM.

  21. #1096
    Quote Originally Posted by fullcourtpress View Post
    what would it take to get walker kessler considering he only makes 5m?
    Fairly little. He seems to be on the outs with Utah, given how they treated him last year and some reporting, so I honestly don't think they want to hold on to him that much. I'm pretty sure you could pull it into the Dejounte trade as long as you sent salary to Utah (hard to come by unless you want to send Jose or similar).

    I'm a fan of the idea of trading BI to Utah for Kessler and John Collins as the primary return, which would work in terms of salary (and save us a bit of money in the short term, about $6m worth) but Collins' contract continues a few years on so it presents the need for moving CJ again, or moving Collins for additional assets in a year or so.

    So there's options but it's a bit tricky.

  22. #1097
    Hollygrove 4 Life DroopyDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Too far from Home
    Posts
    6,770
    These reports of the Pels POSSIBLY wanting Wendell Carter made me go down a mini-rabbit hole to see what Carter's game is about. I didn't watch many Bulls games when he was in the Chi, and same for Orlando... I know who he is but my only recollection of WCJ is how he looked when he played against the Pels.

    I know highlight videos are just those... the HIGHLIGHTS, but I watch how Carter moves and the decisions he makes in the offensive sets that he's in. WCJ is a decent screener and I like Orlando's sets he's put in positions to screen and roll/pop. He often finds soft spots in the defense because Orlando does a ton of screen roll/pop, and he's always ready to shoot when he gets a look as he's not shy about letting that 3 fly. He's also a solid lob threat and a good finisher.

    From these HIGHLIGHTS he seems to be a solid offensive player, and these are only highlights from January of this season.



    These defensive highlights are impressive, and again I know these are HIGHLIGHTS, and don't really show his shortcomings on the defensive end, but I'm looking at him get switched into iso situations on the perimeter, and he seems to be able to hold his own out there. he doesn't look like a fish out of water when he's outside guarding a smaller ballhandler. He's at least TRYING to block shots, which I like as well.



    Just thought I'd share. I know I could have looked at his stats to get an idea, but I prefer to watch him play and see how he moves out there and the decisions that he makes on and off the ball. Looks like he's often-injured though, so if the Pels decide to make a move for him (and other pieces from Orlando) that's something I hope we put into consideration.

  23. #1098
    Snarky Optimistic Guy msusousaphone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lake Charles
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by Nichols View Post
    That's two major handicaps for this team. It's not a free agent destination, and the ownership won't pay a luxury tax. You have no choice but to push all your chips in on Zion and hope he wills this team over the edge with those limitations. That also has its limitations, he's a generational talent. If ownership doesn't create an environment personnel wise that at least gives him a chance to make a title push I don't think he's going to stick around. I could be wrong but he just didn't seem enthused to me until the Pel's made noise in the playoffs last season. I'll remain optimistic in spite of all that.. beating the odds and pushing teams we aren't supposed to is what makes this team fun to watch.
    There's a lot of hyperbole that gets thrown around and there's a lot of opinions that get said as facts so it's best to take everything with a grain of salt because the Pels have proven time and time again to not leak information and they play close to the vest.

    There has never been a time in this franchises history where it was wise to go into the luxury tax. Every time we made any headway with BD, CP3, or AD the superstar would demand a trade before it got to the "push the chips all in" point.

    Gayle Benson owns an NFL team. The Lakers are the only NBA team worth more than the Saints. When the team shows that it is time to go into the luxury tax, she's more than capable of doing it.

    Zion is 23 years old. Pretty much the whole team other than CJ is 26 or under. That "all in" time hassn't come because it puts an expiration date on the team.

    Some other areas we need to temper the hyperbole on:

    Trey is a good player but do you guys see him making all-stars? He's two years younger than BI. It's not like he's 21 and has five years to eclipse Brandon's level. Brandon Ingram made an all-star at a younger age than TMIII currently is. BI's floor, is above Trey's ceiling. BI had a bad run for Team USA....Trey ain't sniffing Team USA. A team not wanting to resign an all-star player because a good starting quality player will be up for an extension soon is.....we gotta reign it in some.

    The latest from Woj is the Pels want to keep BI and BI wants to stay plus Vegas has the betting lines set for him most likely to be extending with us. The current most likely outcome is that we will extend BI. Now there is a decent chance (however less likely) that negotiations breakdown and we trade him.

    Now we probably need to make a trade for a Big because it won't happen in FA. Remember when we all thought the only way we could get Murray was by trading BI? What did we learn from that? Apparently nothing. It is just as likely we land a big by trading players/assets not named BI than by trading BI. The irony is that Trey is probably more tradable than BI and could very well be in packages to get us that Center.

    Last hyperbole that continues to need to be tackled: BI and Zion fit very well together and the team was pretty excellent when they were healthy.
    Last edited by msusousaphone; 07-01-2024 at 12:34 AM.
    BI, Zion, and CJ had a net rating of +3 when on the court together. BI and Zion had a +13.4, BI and CJ had a +13.2, Zion and CJ was just +5.4.

    BI and Zion worked. BI and CJ worked. It was CJ and Zion and all three together that didn't work.

  24. #1099
    Quote Originally Posted by msusousaphone View Post
    There's a lot of hyperbole that gets thrown around and there's a lot of opinions that get said as facts so it's best to take everything with a grain of salt because the Pels have proven time and time again to not leak information and they play close to the vest.

    There has never been a time in this franchises history where it was wise to go into the luxury tax. Every time we made any headway with BD, CP3, or AD the superstar would demand a trade before it got to the "push the chips all in" point.

    Gayle Benson owns an NFL team. The Lakers are the only NBA team worth more than the Saints. When the team shows that it is time to go into the luxury tax, she's more than capable of doing it.

    Zion is 23 years old. Pretty much the whole team other than CJ is 26 or under. That "all in" time hassn't come because it puts an expiration date on the team.

    Some other areas we need to temper the hyperbole on:

    Trey is a good player but do you guys see him making all-stars? He's two years younger than BI. It's not like he's 21 and has five years to eclipse Brandon's level. Brandon Ingram made an all-star at a younger age than TMIII currently is. BI's floor, is above Trey's ceiling. BI had a bad run for Team USA....Trey ain't sniffing Team USA. A team not wanting to resign an all-star player because a good starting quality player will be up for an extension soon is.....we gotta reign it in some.

    The latest from Woj is the Pels want to keep BI and BI wants to stay plus Vegas has the betting lines set for him most likely to be extending with us. The current most likely outcome is that we will extend BI. Now there is a decent chance (however less likely) that negotiations breakdown and we trade him.

    Now we probably need to make a trade for a Big because it won't happen in FA. Remember when we all thought the only way we could get Murray was by trading BI? What did we learn from that? Apparently nothing. It is just as likely we land a big by trading players/assets not named BI than by trading BI. The irony is that Trey is probably more tradable than BI and could very well be in packages to get us that Center.

    Last hyperbole that continues to need to be tackled: BI and Zion fit very well together and the team was pretty excellent when they were healthy.

    All for keeping BI, but Trey never had a chance to start to prove his ceiling

  25. #1100

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •