We have a team option in 15/16 and then he's restricted in 16/17... so he's not going anywhere for quite a while.Originally Posted by HornetGuru
 |
| . |
|
We have a team option in 15/16 and then he's restricted in 16/17... so he's not going anywhere for quite a while.
Dell's proven he's good at prying away RFA's in sign and trades. I could see something like this happening.
Last edited by Pelicantoo; 06-22-2014 at 01:17 AM.
I think SF is more important than C for this team. We need a SF that has great shooting and we need to improve our 3 point shooting this year. My number 1 guy would be to get Gordon Hayward. He's perfect for our team.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Before you criticize what I'm bout to suggest, click the link and read below:
http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/celti...espnapi_public
If Dell loves Vonleh, sees him on par with Embiid, Wiggins, and Parker, and views him as the perfect fit next to AD...
If Vonleh is available at 6, would the Pelicans trade Ryno/Rivers for 6/Wallace? Would the Celtics do that?
Think Ryno's a bad fit for them.
Agreed, and when he is restricted we are the only team who can offer the 5 year max, other teams can only offer 4, but even if for some some out of this world reason he did sign another teams offer sheet we would match. he will be here for another 7 years.
IDK if i would even do that if they said yes. Wallace is terrible. You would have a combined 25 million tied up in eric gordon and gerald wallace. IS Vonleh, a player who could bust like any, worth that? IDK.
I can hope, but we don't have the salary to make it happen, unless dell could trade gordon for an expiring, which won't happen. We would have to trade ryno for an expiring to free up salary. But if it meant getting parsons or hayward, I would do it, I think either of those 2 guys would be more beneficial to this team than ryno. Then u get a cheap center like blatche to bang down low and let AD stay at his natural PF position.
ya know let's say we simply wanted to get in the draft for a role player or a prospect at a needed position
example: many people have mentioned Patrick Young. I agreed he could be a miscast bruiser but I doubt it and it's a gamble
one player that wouldn't be a gamble in my opinion is Jerell Stokes. Most years he would be in the late first like Dejuan Blair was.
but this guy is kinda like Blair but better IMO he is the second rated center in the draft in regards to efficiency.
2nd best in assists
3rd in FT attempts
1st in offensive rebounds
3rd in points per 40
6'8" 265 lbs, he would undoubtedly played minutes at C with last year's squa(7'2" reach).
and he's a 2nd rounder
stats from:
http://www.draftexpress.com/article/...ter-Crop-4611/
I don't think that's the case. I think we have around 6 million in cap space floating around, maybe 7 with Morrow Opting out. Ryno makes a little over 8 million, so in a sign and trade for around 14 million, we'd theoretically have the cap space to do it? What am I missing?
Also, If they took rivers with them for some nominal asset it would clear another 2.3 mil. Then, once you're over the cap, you can use the MLE on someone. I could be wrong here.
Oh ya totally, kid you trade ryno u free up 8 million, that is what I was saying that we would have to do. Thats why i wanted to trade ryno for hayward and use MLE on blatche.
That's actually my team in my 2k association ( with Parsons at the three) . Fun team to play with.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ha i might have to try that! I would love it in real life as well.
You run tyreke at pg and jrue at sg?
I had tyreke in my 2k13 association last year before we signed him, so maybe these moves will come to life also haha.
Nah i run reke at the 2. I might try switching him to PG though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Man, is it a sport to trade ryno for anything, from crap to love? Trade him for this! Trade him for that! Jeez.
I run tyreke at the 1 and jrue at the 2 when i play online, this way if i drive and get stopped i can swing it out to jrue for 3, if it's jrue and i drive and get stopped if tyreke isn't cutting to the basket he doesn't offer too much from 3. Try it out. For defensive match ups u can still make jrue guard the opponents PG. I just put him on which ever player is better. For example when i play the clippers i put jrue on cpm, when i play the rockets i put him on harden.
That happens to me all the time so it makes sense. I did send Tyreke to shooting camp in the offseason, so he's a little better at the three now but i'll still try it out. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw one possibility were the Pelicans could have this lineup:
Jrue Hoilday
Tyreke Evans
Dario Saric
Anthony Davis
Greg Monroe
Only guy you can't move is Davis, he is your franchise player. You don't want to move Jrue either because he is a top 10 pg on an amazing contract. That said, if the deal comes down where you can get a top 3 pick in a trade that includes a combo of Jrue/Gordon/Ryno/Rivers/anyone not named Anthony Davis, and you believe this new guy will be a top 3-15 player in the league, do it.
If you Jimmer it, they will come.
It has nothing to do with being anti-rookie. It has more to do with the established timeline that both he and Monty have said this team is on. People love rookies, but maybe one or two play winning basketball their first year. And maybe one or two more the year after that. A guy like Vonleh will be, at best a 20 mpg guy his first year and will struggle mightily at times. Embiid may not play.
The objective is clearly playoffs next year, so if Dell (and Monty) sign off on trading a core piece for a guy who will give them much less next season, it would truly shock me, and I dont get shocked by much.
@mcnamara247
I know I've told you this before, I'm certain others have as well. . .but here I am again saying it.
You cannot use cap space and the MLE.
On a side note: this thread makes me sad with the suggested trades.
Last edited by Mythrol; 06-22-2014 at 09:07 AM. Reason: yes
I wonder if bulls would give up both 1st rounders if someone took boozer off their hands or would that be too much. I could live with boozer playing center for a year if we could trade Gordon and a first rounder to someone. Maybe even add a protected future with it. Keep the one pick this year for a SF.
Isn't it reasonable though to say that next year isn't what this tram's ultimate goals are about?
If Dell can pull off something that gets him a critical piece of our core during our "championship" years, it's worth it. Maybe he thinks he can move Ryno or Tyreke and replace 85% of their production next year with other off season roster moves. In that case you go get your future, and don't sacrifice that because you think you can compete for an 8th seed next season.
Whether we're a playoff contender or not in 14, will be IMO entirely determined by the progression of Davis and Holiday, how good our bench is, and how well we play defense.
This might be a reasonable objective philosophy to have. It is not Dell and Monty's philosophy, though. So we can all ponder about what we would do, but I personally find it more productive to try to think about what Dell will do. Dell will not take a step back for the next 2-3 years even if it might mean taking two steps forward in years 4-6. He just won't IMO
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote