Sure, and what I'm saying is that it is an insignificant move unless it's part of a larger roster reconstruction. Which isn't necessarily a disagreement to your point, I guess, but just an extension of it.
That is to you, you pointed out that for a team like us, you wouldn't consider get McDermott ''a cherry-on-top fringe move''. What I'm saying is that it has to be a cherry-on-top move, because if it's not a fringe move, it's a major move, and getting McDermott as one of our biggest (or even the biggest) move of the offeseason is a failure. We need an off-season of such impact that, were we to also acquire McDermott, it would be like the 4th most important thing we do. If the acquisition of your 7th man is more than a fringe move, you have a real issue.