Originally Posted by
Pelicanidae
When you watch a draft prospect who you know is good, like Cade, I think its being overtly negative if you spend your time weedling away at minor issues. We already know Cade is really good, we don't need to figure that out or whatever, so when you have someone who is good, the question becomes how good are they?
In that situation, asking the question ''what are they doing when they aren't scoring?'' is a valid thing to do. If Cade has a bad scoring game, which he did and I said straight up at the beginning, you have to ask yourself, okay so what else can he do? That's what I was talking about there. Watch that game back: he played really good defense, and he literally won the game for them.
Those are positive things. The negative thing was his FG%, but as most draft people will tell you, raw FG% is often the least interesting thing about any given player's game.