.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 51 of 54 FirstFirst ... 41 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 LastLast
Results 1,251 to 1,275 of 1341

Thread: NBA DRAFT 2020 DISCUSSION

  1. #1251
    My top players for our draft needs/fits:

    Tier 1-
    Anthony Edwards SG Georgia - best in the draft IMO. We could use a shooting guard like him to take over from Jrue
    James Wiseman C Memphis - best big man in the draft. He has a jumper that can develop and if that happens he?s one of the best centers in the game

    Tier 2-
    LeMelo Ball PG USA ? Australia Pro ball - really talented with the ball and making plays. His shot needs work like his brothers, but doesn?t have the defense like him
    Killian Hayes PG France ?German Pro ball - I?m really high on Hayes and would rather him than Ball. His defense is really good and he needs to work on his shot as well.
    Deni Avdija F Israel - really talented, but Euro guys scare me high in the draft. They either boom or bust. Not too many good players like you find later in the draft.

    Tier 3-
    Onyeka Okongwu C USC - athletic freak that could fit nice next to Zion, but I?m fine with Hayes there.
    Isaac Okoro F Auburn - would be a nice athletic freak type small forward with good defense. BI could play the 2 with ease due to his size. Hopefully his 3 point shot improves.
    Patrick Williams F Florida St - read Okoro

    Tier 4-
    Obi Toppin PF Dayton - if not for his age he would be in Tier 3. Like this due a lot.
    Tyrese Haillburton PG Iowa St - don?t know why, but not a huge fan. Reminds me of Lonzo.
    Devin Vassell G/F Florida St - a good 3 & D guy that would fit in nicely on the wing

    Tier 5- (After those 11 players I could take just about anyone of the guys below and be happy)
    Saddiq Bey SF Villanova (good 3 & D wing)
    Kira Lewis PG Alabama (really fast point guard that could fit like a glove with Zion & Hayes)
    RJ Hampton G USA ?New Zealand Pro ball (don?t know why but I liked this kid through the whole process. Think he would be higher if he played in the states)
    Aaron Nesmith SF Vanderbilt (really good wing 3 point shooter that every team could use in today?s NBA)
    Tyrese Maxey G Kentucky (a nice combo guard just has that ?IT? factor. He’s OKC’s Luguentz Dort, but with more upside)
    Cole Anthony PG UNC (read Maxey, but more point guard as Maxey more 2)
    Precious Achiuwa F Memphis (another good big that is kind of rare in this lottery portion of the draft. A bunch of PGs and wings)
    Last edited by DaPelFromHell; 11-15-2020 at 04:44 PM.

  2. #1252
    This isn't meant to be prediction as to how his rookie season may go, but does Killian Hayes' play style remind anyone else of NAW. Its the combination of the left handed cross court swing passes, the smooth step back jumper that he struggled to connect on but looks pretty, the middling athleticism that makes him maybe a step slow but at the same time can get defenders off balance when driving to the rim. NAW's greatest skill might be his ambidexterity, which Hayes obviously doesn't possess, but I think the comp is pretty close. Hayes is more than likely a better natural creator for others.

    Again, this isn't meant to be a dig on Hayes. I think they're similar prospects, but NAW was 21 when drafted whereas Hayes is 19 (and I'm still a big NAW believer). I would love to see those two guys on a second unit playing off of each other.

  3. #1253
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,306
    Quote Originally Posted by pelafanatic View Post
    This isn't meant to be prediction as to how his rookie season may go, but does Killian Hayes' play style remind anyone else of NAW. Its the combination of the left handed cross court swing passes, the smooth step back jumper that he struggled to connect on but looks pretty, the middling athleticism that makes him maybe a step slow but at the same time can get defenders off balance when driving to the rim. NAW's greatest skill might be his ambidexterity, which Hayes obviously doesn't possess, but I think the comp is pretty close. Hayes is more than likely a better natural creator for others.

    Again, this isn't meant to be a dig on Hayes. I think they're similar prospects, but NAW was 21 when drafted whereas Hayes is 19 (and I'm still a big NAW believer). I would love to see those two guys on a second unit playing off of each other.
    Except that Hayes is the best P&R guard in the draft and NAW had not yet developed in that area.

  4. #1254
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    Except that Hayes is the best P&R guard in the draft and NAW had not yet developed in that area.
    NAW's on ball skills are still pretty raw because he was not a primary ball handler for most of his college days. But again, another reason why the Hayes/NAW tandem would be pretty fun

  5. #1255
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    Except that Hayes is the best P&R guard in the draft and NAW had not yet developed in that area.
    I don't believe that Hayes is currently the best PnR guard in the draft (that title would go to Malachi Flynn, who is just incredibly refined) but I do agree that he has the clearest path to being the best PnR guard fairly quickly. His development curve has been stunningly impressive, and his vision just seems better and more adventurous which is vital in exploiting weaknesses in defenses.

    And yeah I agree, I think that NAW is a lot better than he showed this past year but he's also 3 full years older than Hayes and still worse at several key primary things. There's a reason that when NAW was drafted my initial reaction was that he was a fine guy who would probably end up being a capable backup combo guard but he didn't thrill me.
    Basketball.

  6. #1256
    If we were to keep 24 and actually use it, I'd probably draft Desmond Bane if he's still there. 13 + 24 delivering you something like Tyrese Maxey and Desmond Bane would be cool.

  7. #1257
    Snarky Optimistic Guy msusousaphone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lake Charles
    Posts
    4,729
    I wonder if there is a way we could split Jalen Smith in half....then we could draft Ja Smi at 13 and Len Th at 24.
    BI, Zion, and CJ had a net rating of +3 when on the court together. BI and Zion had a +13.4, BI and CJ had a +13.2, Zion and CJ was just +5.4.

    BI and Zion worked. BI and CJ worked. It was CJ and Zion and all three together that didn't work.

  8. #1258
    Quote Originally Posted by msusousaphone View Post
    I wonder if there is a way we could split Jalen Smith in half....then we could draft Ja Smi at 13 and Len Th at 24.
    Gonna stuff you in a locker

  9. #1259
    I think I prefer Oturu to Smith since Smith didn?t gain a pound in the last 8 months.

  10. #1260
    Snarky Optimistic Guy msusousaphone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lake Charles
    Posts
    4,729
    My boy is gonna gain them pounds!

    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    Gonna stuff you in a locker
    Lol

  11. #1261
    Quote Originally Posted by Snarly View Post
    I think I prefer Oturu to Smith since Smith didn?t gain a pound in the last 8 months.
    Oturu is a guy that you pick up in the late second, in my view. There's not really anything notably appealing about him.

    If anything, it's good that Smith didn't gain much weight: his maximum upside leverages his quite good shooting skills for a big and his decent handle, which means added motion and fluidity is good for him. His physical concerns are real, but they're not mass based, they're to do with his high centre of gravity and weak base.

  12. #1262
    Please read this interview from today with Xavier Tillman. It's fairly extensive and very encouraging.

    https://hoopshype.com/2020/11/17/xav...ature-profile/

    Here are some quotes I loved from it:

    You ended your collegiate career coming off four really big wins against top 25 teams, including a top 10 team in Ohio State. How much did it help to go out that way?

    XT: It meant everything to me to win against the highest competition. I never like to back down, ever, no matter who I’m playing against. For example, if I am going against a top-ranked player, those are the games I want to see what I can do against them. I’m going to give it my all, play as hard as I can, play as smart as I can. I want to see if you’re worthy of the hype or not. So that is something that I took pride in, going against those top guys and getting the opportunity to play against the top guys to finish the season.
    I’d love to hear about your defensive identity and your defensive role, and how you feel that’ll translate into the NBA.

    XT: The first thing that I would say is that I am vocal and I am an anchor on defense. I am the guy who is calling out all the screens on the back end, calling out all the coverages. I’m the guy who watches a lot of film and I call the plays out as soon as they come out. I help my teammates navigate through all of them. Getting everybody on board, that’s what I’m good at.

    Then, individually, I guard well coming off screens. Michigan State did a great job of teaching me every single piece of defensive coverage: From a soft hedge to a hard hedge, to a feather, to icing ball screens, to dropping back. We looked at every single ball screen. I’ll be able to translate that to the NBA. I know the unathletic bigs will drop while the really athletic bigs can press up and trap. I can get the ball out of the guard’s hands or even switch onto them. That is something I feel like I have the capabilities of doing and that’s what will help me a lot in the NBA because a lot of teams will move and switch. That’s what Michigan State did to prepare me for my career.

    The last thing I would say about my defense is my on-ball ability. I am able to guard both bigs in the post. I can guard fours and threes on the wing, who can put the ball on the floor. That was kind of the last piece that showed up my junior year. I was able to do that, hold people down to way below their numbers. I was able to come up with the right job.
    Can you walk me through what your film-watching process looks like?

    XT: The film-watching process for me is a couple of different things. The first thing is reading tendencies and what teams are really good at, whether they’re driving right or driving left, finishing right, finishing left. What shoulders do they like to shoot their turnarounds over? Are they a shooter? Can they shoot free throws? All that gets factored in when I’m watching film. So now I see what you’re good at.

    A good example is how I prepared for Luka Garza from Iowa. When he catches the ball, he only wanted to shoot it with his right hand, Guarding him, you have to make him shoot it with his left hand. If you are able to do that, you get a block every time. Because I know that’s what you want to do and I’m going to make it as difficult as possible for you to do that. Garza is a guy who can stretch the floor so when he was just sitting at the 3-point line, I’m sitting at the 3-point line with him. I’m not going to go help because I know if for some reason I go down to help and they’re able to kick the ball back, it’s three points every time. I’m going to stay with you. You’re just going to have a long night.
    Where is your overall confidence with your jump shot right now?

    XT: I’ve seen a lot of really good progress with it. It is elevated more. I have good touch now. I am able to shoot from a lot deeper. It doesn’t feel like I’m throwing the ball at the rim. It actually feels smooth. It’s almost like there is an arc where it’s nice and smooth. It’s not forced. I’m falling in love with my jump shooting during these workouts. I’ve learned how easy it is. It is a lot easier than fighting for a rebound. If this takes a lot less effort, I’m going to be able to do this right away as soon as I master it.

  13. #1263
    The Franchise Contributor luigi modelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,345
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    Please read this interview from today with Xavier Tillman. It's fairly extensive and very encouraging.

    https://hoopshype.com/2020/11/17/xav...ature-profile/

    Here are some quotes I loved from it:
    Thats some serious awareness. Thanks for the crib notes!

  14. #1264
    With the direction we are going, we will be picking high upside guys with our picks compared to serviceable/role type players...

  15. #1265
    Quote Originally Posted by PaKwAn View Post
    With the direction we are going, we will be picking high upside guys with our picks compared to serviceable/role type players...
    High upside is relative.

    In this draft, someone who you think will be a comfortably starter calibre player in the 20s is an upside pick.

  16. #1266


    5th might be a bit harsh, but yeah basically.

  17. #1267
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post


    5th might be a bit harsh, but yeah basically.
    I don?t get it with Nesmith. He put up big numbers against crap teams, then got injured before conference play. Bane is basically better at everything, the negative most regularly bought up is a negative wingspan. Okay? so he can?t guard big 3s, 4s, and 5s, exactly how many guys in this draft are we slotting to be anything better than solid two position defenders?

  18. #1268
    Bledsoe and #24 to Knicks for #8 and Payton??

  19. #1269
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!! donato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,584
    Quote Originally Posted by As I See It View Post
    Bledsoe and #24 to Knicks for #8 and Payton??
    Does Bledsoe really have that much value?

  20. #1270
    Quote Originally Posted by donato View Post
    Does Bledsoe really have that much value?
    He instantly becomes the best player on the Knicks. So to them, yeah.

  21. #1271
    Quote Originally Posted by As I See It View Post
    Bledsoe and #24 to Knicks for #8 and Payton??
    Knicks are chasing Westbrook first

  22. #1272
    Quote Originally Posted by bogiesfedora View Post
    I don?t get it with Nesmith. He put up big numbers against crap teams, then got injured before conference play. Bane is basically better at everything, the negative most regularly bought up is a negative wingspan. Okay? so he can?t guard big 3s, 4s, and 5s, exactly how many guys in this draft are we slotting to be anything better than solid two position defenders?
    Nesmith shot over 50% from 3 on high attempts. For some people, that is literally all they need.

    They don't care that it was a giant jump from last year, through fairly few games, and therefore unlikely to be wholly representative of his ability (I still think he'll be a good shooter but not that good). They also don't care that he has basically no other skills at all. Poor decision maker, bad defender, bad ballhandler, no passing feel or craft, can't finish at the rim even when he does get there which isn't often, isn't particularly fast, isn't particularly strong, and can't shoot off the dribble.

    His one skill is shooting off the catch. He is very good at that, and I think he will be good at that in the NBA. But the popular idea that he's the best shooter in the draft or something is absolutely absurd, imo.

    Bane is better at basically everything. Cassius Winston is small, but is still a better shooter and has much better auxiliary skills. Markus Howard has 4 consecutive years of shooting at least 40%, and took over 8 threes per game for the last three years in a row, as well as being a better passer. Like, look at this:

    Career totals:

    Aaron Nesmith: 41.0% from 3 (119/290)
    Desmond Bane: 43.3% from 3 (249/575)
    Cassius Winston: 43.0% from 3 (259/602)
    Markus Howard: 42.7% from 3 (434/1017)
    Sam Merrill: 42.0% from 3 (319/759)
    Killian Tillie: 44.4% from 3 (106/239) [note: he is a centre]

    You see how so many of these guys actually have higher career percentage on as many as double, even triple the attempts?

    Now, there are other reasons you might not be so hot on those guys: Sam Merrill is already 24, and Markus Howard is Jameer Nelson size. But if all you're talking about is shooting, they are just clearly better at it. Add to that that all of those guys can shoot off the dribble (outside of Tillie, who I remind you is 6'10 and can still shoot off curls) and can relocate, both vital skills for shooters that Nesmith cannot do, it's just obvious that he's not one of the top 3 shooters in the class.

  23. #1273
    Quote Originally Posted by donato View Post
    Does Bledsoe really have that much value?
    I know I'll take flak for this, but he's really a clone of Jrue. Why Milwaukee gave us this treasure chest for Jrue is crazy.

    Bledsoe is a defensive juggernaut, and competent offensively. He'll offer the Knicks an instant upgrade in the back court.
    Last edited by As I See It; 11-17-2020 at 02:23 PM.

  24. #1274
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    Nesmith shot over 50% from 3 on high attempts. For some people, that is literally all they need.

    They don't care that it was a giant jump from last year, through fairly few games, and therefore unlikely to be wholly representative of his ability (I still think he'll be a good shooter but not that good). They also don't care that he has basically no other skills at all. Poor decision maker, bad defender, bad ballhandler, no passing feel or craft, can't finish at the rim even when he does get there which isn't often, isn't particularly fast, isn't particularly strong, and can't shoot off the dribble.

    His one skill is shooting off the catch. He is very good at that, and I think he will be good at that in the NBA. But the popular idea that he's the best shooter in the draft or something is absolutely absurd, imo.

    Bane is better at basically everything. Cassius Winston is small, but is still a better shooter and has much better auxiliary skills. Markus Howard has 4 consecutive years of shooting at least 40%, and took over 8 threes per game for the last three years in a row, as well as being a better passer. Like, look at this:

    Career totals:

    Aaron Nesmith: 41.0% from 3 (119/290)
    Desmond Bane: 43.3% from 3 (249/575)
    Cassius Winston: 43.0% from 3 (259/602)
    Markus Howard: 42.7% from 3 (434/1017)
    Sam Merrill: 42.0% from 3 (319/759)
    Killian Tillie: 44.4% from 3 (106/239) [note: he is a centre]

    You see how so many of these guys actually have higher career percentage on as many as double, even triple the attempts?

    Now, there are other reasons you might not be so hot on those guys: Sam Merrill is already 24, and Markus Howard is Jameer Nelson size. But if all you're talking about is shooting, they are just clearly better at it. Add to that that all of those guys can shoot off the dribble (outside of Tillie, who I remind you is 6'10 and can still shoot off curls) and can relocate, both vital skills for shooters that Nesmith cannot do, it's just obvious that he's not one of the top 3 shooters in the class.
    So he is basically Reggie Bullock. Obviously that has some value in the right contexts, but I am not taking that in the top 20 much less the lottery.

  25. #1275
    Quote Originally Posted by bogiesfedora View Post
    So he is basically Reggie Bullock. Obviously that has some value in the right contexts, but I am not taking that in the top 20 much less the lottery.
    Completely agree. I'd maybe take him at, say, 25-35 range because there is a use to very good shooters and most of the other good players will be gone by then, but at 13 there are so many better options.

    If all you care about is shooting just add Bane. He's every put the motion/catch shooter Nesmith is, except he can also shoot off the dribble, and pass, and defend a bit, and attack closeouts, and it looks like he actually knows what basketball is.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •