This is not a terrible write up. There's some very important stuff that I think is left off, as well as some fairly glaring inaccuracies here and there, but overall it's not too bad.
Just an example of each, so that you can consider it -
Something overlooked: Vassell's write up doesn't mention his playmaking flashes, which are extremely promising and very important for whenever we're talking about his ceiling. If you have the ability to be a legitimately plus wing passer rather than just an auxiliary one, that boosts your value quite considerably. It also doesn't mention that he was a pretty good off-the-dribble shooter, which again, is vital for talking about his upside: catch and shoot guys are fairly common, the ability to hit off the pull-up amplifies value again. Not mentioning either of these things when you're trying to justify a top 5 pick is kind of odd.
A glaring inaccuracy: Wiseman does not have a developing face-up game, really. He showed a lot of it pre-college and it was really bad almost all the time, with poor shooting and a turnover prone 'handle', and then at the college level he didn't really get a chance to show it off much. He hasn't really shown any of the major indicators that would imply there's real material to work with here, other than the willingness to do it. In fact, what is more encouraging than the face-up game is the fact that at college he didn't do it as much, which may imply that he's willing to play within a role more as the level of competition ticks up.
Then there's stuff like him basically just saying that his judgement on Killian Hayes is almost entirely based off highlights, which is kind of absurd. It leads to him saying stuff like ''he's not a great shooter'' which is kind of an issue: Hayes was a very good shooting prospect who showed basically everything other than raw 3pt% that you'd want, and his pull-up game, again, projects well. Secondly, and this is just a pet peeve, I hate when people bang on about prospects only having a left hand. Why? Because they never do it the other way around. Nobody ever says ''oh man, this guy only has a right hand, they can't finish at all with the left'', but it's very common for people to say the reverse: I think it's just because left handedness is more unusual so it sticks out more to them. In any case, it's not a major concern anymore than right-hand dominance is, which is to say, it's not a big issue.
I also think his analyses of Nesmith, Okoro, and Josh Green are pretty shambolic.
Okay so maybe I have more problems with it than I thought initially.