That does seem to be the case, yes.
You're going with listed height
Gotcha. Call me back when Kevin Love is 6'10, when Allen Iverson is 6'0, and when KD is 6'9.
I'm not blowing anything up. In college, Garland averaged 2.6 assists and 3.0 turnovers per game. That's an AST/TO ratio of 0.86. That is not very good. Lead guards typically need an AST/TO ratio of at least 2, and preferably higher. For comparison, the worst AST/TO ratio Curry had in his three years of college was 1.0, which is still poor but is better than Garland's. By the time Curry left college, his AST/TO ratio was 2.33, which is much better. This is an example of where going back to college helped Curry: he was able to improve his game without being thrown into the deep end of the NBA so that when he came out, his handle had tightened up and his passing was better.
Trae Young, who you also compare him to, had an AST/TO ratio of 1.7 in college, and averaged literally more than three times as many assists per game. The feel and promise as a playmaker is just not the same.
I've said about 40 times at this point that his sub-optimal shooting form is not going to stop him from being a good shooter, so it's not something that's going to wash out with statistics: it's an aesthetic and training issue. Your inability to grasp this is either a sign that you're not capable of reading and understanding the point, or that you're purposefully misunderstanding it for the sake of petty argument. Either way, that's pretty disappointing.