. |
Last edited by Pels4Life; 06-18-2019 at 06:55 AM.
I am very high on RJ, however I do not think it is worth giving up much assets outside of #4 to get him. Obviously I'm not saying #4 and #2 should swap evenly, but I don't think we should give up any Lakers picks if we can help it. What type of value do you guys think it would take to move from 4 to 2, also why 2 and not 3?
Ingram doesn’t have as much value because he’s a RFA after the season.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Emeka Okafor - Joe Smith - Carmelo Anthony - Manu Ginobili - Jason Williams
Al Jefferson - James Posey - Aaron McKie - Shaun Livingston
“Ingram doesn’t have as much value because he’s a RFA after the season”
Would you rather 1 or 2 years of Ingram or 4 or 5 years with Barrett. plus you have to consider the benefit of building team chemistry and loyalty with Zion. Bringing his best friend on board would likely increase the odds of him sticking with the franchise.
Last edited by hornetsrebirth; 06-18-2019 at 09:11 AM.
As long as we don't give away Ball. I may have been listening to too much NBA on XM but folks are really high on Ball paired with Zion. So many people feel that they will compliment each other in dynamic ways.
This is smoke. Griffin is insuring that Culver will be there at 4 by boosting Barrett's stock
What happens if the Knicks Knick and don’t draft RJ Barrett?
If you Jimmer it, they will come.
My question is this, if the trade isn't even finalized until July. Why are people still trying to trade Ingram or ball with the 4th pick? Is that possible? And even after it gets finalized don't you have to wait like 3 months before you can trade a player again? Am I tripping?
Man if we trade up to get the #2, you're getting Ja lol. Not getting Barrett for #2 man.
A lot of smokescreens , Knicks also put this out there,
https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/...z1hmx7mzu534j1
Barrett could fall in our hands at #4
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)