. |
Ingram and the 4th are plausible in a trade but they wouldn't want an unproven Lonzo. They'll want the farm for Beal starting with at least 2 firsts and Ingram. Which is why ill pass. No need to go get it all at once. Besides I want to keep Ingram. I don't understand the hate on that man.
Just because we HAVE assets to spend, doesn't mean we have to spend them. Obviously we don't want to be Danny Ainge, clinging on to second round picks over gaining superstars, but I don't really want to line up everything we just gained and dropkick them into the ocean during one summer.
Basketball.
I don't want to be another Minnesota Chicago Phoenix Orlando with all these picks and nothing materializes.
You either roll with Lonzo and let him develop or trade him for Beal. You do not overload the roster with highly paid guards on a rebuilding team when you have a big hole at the 5 to fill.
Beal hasn’t led Washington nowhere I’m cool with Lonzo we need to listen to what the players say ; how may times will Jrue say I don’t wanna be a point guard for people to listen or ad say I don’t want to play center , I bet Noel would’ve be great with AD , or look at buddy in sac town stop being so quick to trade and evaluate the team and the future
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)