.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 115 of 127 FirstFirst ... 15 65 105 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 125 ... LastLast
Results 2,851 to 2,875 of 3173

Thread: AD trade scenarios...

  1. #2851
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    That's the key. Thus far he has spoken like someone that is not intending on engaging.
    He is engaging by not engaging. All part of the game.

  2. #2852
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    public housing
    Posts
    3,515
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    That's the key. Thus far he has spoken like someone that is not intending on engaging.
    True. But a lot folks around the league believed the Pelicans would blow it all up and Jrue would be traded right after AD. Whatever Griff's intentions, it makes complete sense to say he's not trading Jrue for the same reasons it makes sense to say he wants AD to stay and will consider keeping him to play next to Zion. It could be all about leverage. Jrue's price is higher if you say he's a cornerstone of the franchise and you don't intend to move him. That's not going to stop GM's from calling Griff and making offers.

    OR... Griff really has no intention of ever trading Jrue Holiday, even though he can opt out in 2 years and become a free agent.

  3. #2853
    Quote Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP View Post
    OR... Griff really has no intention of ever trading Jrue Holiday, even though he can opt out in 2 years and become a free agent.
    Do you actually think that's a big deal?
    Basketball.

  4. #2854
    r/lakers
    HAKERS
    u/RDAmbition 3m
    1
    Latest AD News: Chicago has stepped
    up as the potential third team. Kuzma
    is involved in the trade, Ingram is
    NOT.
    NBA
    Lakers get: AD
    Pelicans get: Lavine, #7, Lakers 2020 unprotected
    1st,Kuzma and Hart
    Bulls get: Lonzo, Solomon Hill and our #4 pick
    This does NOT mean the trade is done, it's simply
    the most recent offer being closely discussed.
    Sorry for messed up format.

    I think Ingram got to go if want another Max Slot. Leaving Ingram out simply the bare minimum. He's leaving next year anyway. Maybe we can flip Lavine for a Future 1st. Get Garland at 7th?

  5. #2855
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    Im definitely a fan of Claxton, although I have him going late first round or maybe early second. Bunch of reasons for that: he's a little older, can't shoot the three, wasn't massively efficient inside, was kind of meh defensively a lot of the time. But there definitely is a lot to like. There's a confidence and a smoothness to his game, and he's a legitimate rim protector with decent hands for a big. If he falls to us in the second round, which I think is plausible, I'd be pretty happy to take him.

    Can't speak too much on Thybulle. I haven't watched as much of him in detail as I should. His offense isn't very encouraging, especially given that he can't shoot, but his FT%age is encouraging. He's not a rebounder or a passer, which is a big shame, because his length is fantastic for his height and he has solid defensive instincts. He's not the team defender that his stats would imply, and I think that will limit him in the NBA, but he has a pretty strong ceiling as a late first round pick as a defensive specialist.
    The thing with Thybulle is his shot looks fine, he gets good elevation, and has a high release point. Giving his ft% and touch around the rim I would be suprised if he was not at least a league average shooter with the potential for more. On defense its really all about projection, he has not played in a man scheme since Romar left. However, he is incredibly disruptive and plays his ****** off. He is also a plus athlete. Since the finals ended I could easily seeing him being a Danny Green level piece.

  6. #2856
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    public housing
    Posts
    3,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicanidae View Post
    Do you actually think that's a big deal?
    I think Jrue will opt out of his contract after the 20/21 season. He'll be 31 years old, and if the Pelicans aren't competing deep in the playoffs, I don't expect him to sign for anything less than a 4 yrs/near max. If he's going to take any sort of discount, it would be for a chance to play in the finals. He may love New Orleans, the organization, and his teammates, but he will likely be looking at his last big pay day and chance to make sure he's on a team that maximizes his ability to compete at the highest level for a championship. Everyone knows how competitive Jrue is. I think winning will be very important to him. More so than being a team leader.

    Jrue is awesome. I don't want to trade Jrue, and even if it's for two more years only, he may have more value to us than what another team is willing to offer. But I think his value is at the highest it will be right now, because of supply and demand in the market and the number of years remaining on his deal.

    I wouldn't shop Jrue Holiday, but I'd listen to calls. YES - I think it's a big deal that he has two years left on his deal. It's less of a deal if no one is offering you premium value.
    Last edited by NMThreeMVP; 06-14-2019 at 03:35 PM.

  7. #2857
    Hall of Famer WildlifeAirGrp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    New Orleans/Kenya
    Posts
    666
    Quote Originally Posted by Taker597 View Post
    r/lakers
    HAKERS
    u/RDAmbition 3m
    1
    Latest AD News: Chicago has stepped
    up as the potential third team. Kuzma
    is involved in the trade, Ingram is
    NOT.
    NBA
    Lakers get: AD
    Pelicans get: Lavine, #7, Lakers 2020 unprotected
    1st,Kuzma and Hart
    Bulls get: Lonzo, Solomon Hill and our #4 pick
    This does NOT mean the trade is done, it's simply
    the most recent offer being closely discussed.
    Sorry for messed up format.

    I think Ingram got to go if want another Max Slot. Leaving Ingram out simply the bare minimum. He's leaving next year anyway. Maybe we can flip Lavine for a Future 1st. Get Garland at 7th?
    That's a winner in my eyes. Especially, when AD goes down for about 35 games that 2020 pick will be worth something. Also, getting Solo off the books washes away the stench that Demps left behind.
    Tanking since 2009

    Wildlife Aviation Group

  8. #2858
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    public housing
    Posts
    3,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Taker597 View Post
    r/lakers
    HAKERS
    u/RDAmbition 3m
    1
    Latest AD News: Chicago has stepped
    up as the potential third team. Kuzma
    is involved in the trade, Ingram is
    NOT.
    NBA
    Lakers get: AD
    Pelicans get: Lavine, #7, Lakers 2020 unprotected
    1st,Kuzma and Hart
    Bulls get: Lonzo, Solomon Hill and our #4 pick
    This does NOT mean the trade is done, it's simply
    the most recent offer being closely discussed.
    Sorry for messed up format.

    I think Ingram got to go if want another Max Slot. Leaving Ingram out simply the bare minimum. He's leaving next year anyway. Maybe we can flip Lavine for a Future 1st. Get Garland at 7th?
    I can't see Griff choosing Kuzma over Ingram. Honestly... Griff is getting played if he doesn't get both.

  9. #2859
    Posted by a "reddit insider" RDAmbition that seems to have some info...take it for what it is.

    Posted byu/RDAmbition
    21 minutes ago
    2
    Latest AD News: Chicago has stepped up as the potential third team. Kuzma is involved in the trade, Ingram is NOT.
    Lakers get: AD

    Pelicans get: Lavine, #7, Lakers 2020 unprotected 1st,Kuzma and Hart

    Bulls get: Lonzo, Solomon Hill and our #4 pick

    This does NOT mean the trade is done, it’s simply the most recent offer being closely discussed.

    Sorry for messed up format, I can only post on reddit via mobile since I don’t remember my password and have no email set up on it.

    PS: wanted to post this on lakersground aswell but account is giving me errors so feel free to share this info on there aswell. Reddit/Lakers and Lakersground.net both places I want to inform fans

    https://www.reddit.com/r/lakers/comm...ped_up_as_the/

  10. #2860
    beat me to it lol

  11. #2861
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,306
    Probably just speculation. I cannot see Ingram not being in the deal if there is any truth to how much Griffin likes him.

  12. #2862
    well blood clot ingram is a little bit of a risk. If they can switch that #7 to #4 i kinda like it

  13. #2863
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,306
    Quote Originally Posted by Pels4Life View Post
    well blood clot ingram is a little bit of a risk. If they can switch that #7 to #4 i kinda like it
    He's a huge risk, but reportedly Griffin loves him. Not sure how true that is, but that is the story.

  14. #2864
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,306
    If Ingram added, it is not completely terrible, although Lavine's contract is not pretty and he is very ball dominant.

  15. #2865
    Lavine is a pretty solid player. a 20 point a game guy, 45% FG, 80% FT, 38% 3PT, 5 rebounds, 5 assists, shoots about 5 FTs per game.

  16. #2866
    Quote Originally Posted by Pels4Life View Post
    Posted by a "reddit insider" RDAmbition that seems to have some info...take it for what it is.

    Posted byu/RDAmbition
    21 minutes ago
    2
    Latest AD News: Chicago has stepped up as the potential third team. Kuzma is involved in the trade, Ingram is NOT.
    Lakers get: AD

    Pelicans get: Lavine, #7, Lakers 2020 unprotected 1st,Kuzma and Hart

    Bulls get: Lonzo, Solomon Hill and our #4 pick

    This does NOT mean the trade is done, it’s simply the most recent offer being closely discussed.

    Sorry for messed up format, I can only post on reddit via mobile since I don’t remember my password and have no email set up on it.

    PS: wanted to post this on lakersground aswell but account is giving me errors so feel free to share this info on there aswell. Reddit/Lakers and Lakersground.net both places I want to inform fans

    https://www.reddit.com/r/lakers/comm...ped_up_as_the/
    Doesn’t that violate the Stepien rule? Lakers would be giving up 4 this year, and their first next.

  17. #2867
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    Probably just speculation. I cannot see Ingram not being in the deal if there is any truth to how much Griffin likes him.
    He's an expiring. So, we can get him in FA if we really want. Probably wont. Griffin valuing Ball and Kuz over him makes sense. More years at cheap rate.

  18. #2868
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,306
    I would counter back with:

    CHI: #4, Ball, Hill
    LAL: AD
    Pels: #7, Lavine, Ingram, Kuzma, Hart, 2020 unprotected #1, 2022 unprotected #1 and 2021 swap rights.

    Still would not be blown away (mainly because I am not a fan of Lavine), but improves deal. I almost wonder if it would be better to cut Chicago out and keep Ball and the #4.

  19. #2869
    Quote Originally Posted by bogiesfedora View Post
    Doesn’t that violate the Stepien rule? Lakers would be giving up 4 this year, and their first next.
    Trade can't be official till July 1st. After the draft.

  20. #2870
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,306
    Quote Originally Posted by bogiesfedora View Post
    Doesn’t that violate the Stepien rule? Lakers would be giving up 4 this year, and their first next.
    As the trade would not be finalized until after the draft, the 2019 pick would already have been made and they would be trading the rights to the player, not the pick.

  21. #2871
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,306
    Quote Originally Posted by Taker597 View Post
    He's an expiring. So, we can get him in FA if we really want. Probably wont. Griffin valuing Ball and Kuz over him makes sense. More years at cheap rate.
    He would be restricted and we would have bird rights if obtained in trade. In this supposed proposal, we would not be getting Ball.

  22. #2872
    Quote Originally Posted by Taker597 View Post
    Trade can't be official till July 1st. After the draft.
    Got it, Im not in love with Lavine he is literally one of the worst defenders in the NBA. He also lacks any semblance of basketball IQ. His ceiling at this point to me is a volume scorer off the bench. That player in theory is fine, but being the headliner in a trade package for a top 5 player in the NBA is lacking.

  23. #2873
    The LA Media is wild. I thought I was having a conversation with a Laker fan about them overvaluing their assets (by telling him “if they are so good Griff would have accepted them by now.”)And he demanded that I put forth a trade that would be better. Thing is there are better trades that are being offered it’s just that only the Lakers one is being leaked because the Lakers can’t keep their yaps shut. If I give him a random trade he will (presumably) fire back with either “that’s an impossible trade”, or “the Lakers trade is better”.

    Anyway, feel free to get at ya boy, and give him your best offer.

    https://twitter.com/run_the_baloney/...596546562?s=21
    If you Jimmer it, they will come.

  24. #2874
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    He would be restricted and we would have bird rights if obtained in trade. In this supposed proposal, we would not be getting Ball.
    So... You want to pull an Eric Gorden and potentially match $27 million a year max. Bold move. I don't think it's worth it.

  25. #2875
    Quote Originally Posted by bogiesfedora View Post
    Got it, Im not in love with Lavine he is literally one of the worst defenders in the NBA. He also lacks any semblance of basketball IQ. His ceiling at this point to me is a volume scorer off the bench. That player in theory is fine, but being the headliner in a trade package for a top 5 player in the NBA is lacking.
    I'd try to flip him to Boston at 14 if Boi Boi is still available, but 99% Danny wouldn't bite. .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •