I like casspi, he's a great shooter who can play stretch 4 ala' Ryan Anderson. Between him and Hill I like our versatility at SF.
I really like this trade!!
 |
| . |
|
I like casspi, he's a great shooter who can play stretch 4 ala' Ryan Anderson. Between him and Hill I like our versatility at SF.
I really like this trade!!
BoogieBrow BoogieBrow BoogieBrow
@DanielVeuleman
I would just like to apologize to Dell after talking **** about him for pretty much 4 years straight. All is forgiven now. Thank God for the Kings.
Skip weighs in lol
Interesting that of all people, Baron Davis had one of the more logical takes on the trade:
Jrue dat
Contributor
I almost hate to ask the unthinkable question... given the ENORMOUS consensus that the Pels fleeced the Kings on this trade.. is there any chance the NBA might veto this trade? I can't imagine they would... but is there a teeny possibility?
The NBA had an ownership interest over the Hornets in that trade. They do not possess such an interest here. There won't be a veto.Originally Posted by neworleanshoo
"I'm not going to allow my putative owner to answer that question, this is an NBA related press conference. Paul Tagliabue and Roger Goodell have collectively sung their praises of Tom and if uh ESPN has a problem with that tell Mr. Skipper to call me at my office."
So they're saying they're probably waiving matt Barnes
They have to waive Barnes to make room for the players they are acquiring.
Contributor
ok thanks for quelling my paranoia
Exactly. The idiotic media is the one who put it in everyone's head that the league has some sort of veto power on trades. The only reason they were able to turn down the CP trade was because the league owned the then Hornets.
Wish we would have thrown in qpon and got McLemore. Especially if they are just going to buy Galloway out. Could have kept him and maybe moved him in another trade.
Or even Terrance Jones. What confuses me even more about Sacramento is that they need a 4. Now they still have no 4 and by not sending McLemore to the Pels, the Pels have little depth in the back court. This deal could've made a lot more basketball sense and Sacramento could've saved face a bit.
That actually makes too much sense. Probably why the Kings didn't think of it.
Last edited by N.O.Bronco; 02-20-2017 at 12:29 PM.
How about Batman and Superman? The Justice League?
If they release Barnes and buy out Galloway. Can we just sign them for cheap depth? Assuming we move Jones of course?
Barnes, yes. Galloway, no.
Rules against that I presume?
Still, Barnes wouldn't be a bad pick up in our situation.
I don't even think @NBA2K would let that trade happen even with the trade override option off LOL
— Isaiah Thomas (@Isaiah_Thomas) February 20, 2017
Question 100 of the CBA Faq:
"A team cannot reacquire a player they traded away during that season (a season being July 1 - June 30). If he is waived by his new team, then he cannot re-sign with his original team until the one-year anniversary of the trade, or until the July 1 following the end of his contract, whichever comes first. However, if a team trades a player's draft rights, they can reacquire the player during the same season."
Now THAT is funny
Talk about the one who got away. The Kings and Suns just let Thomas walk. Moves like that are why those teams are where they are now.
If you Jimmer it, they will come.
I can understand the Suns being that they have Bledsoe but the Kings angle doesn't make sense. They essentially let Thomas walk because they thought they got a better player when they signed Collison. Thinking Collison is better than Thomas is just clueless.
Just heard on the radio Ben Mc and Collison (already knew about him) are on the block as well. Kings cleaning house over there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote