Did you not read my post? Apparently not because I peppered it with plenty praise. But it was an overall bad performance.
And to rant for a second....
I am really getting sick and tired of this attitude moderating around here(not just from you). Are you putting some premium on eternal optimism or something? This is a .500 team. We aren't GS. This isn't a bunch of irrational fans nit-picking a championship team on a 10-2 w/l run. People complain not out of hate, but love. We love our team and want to see them get better. Some fans live in a bubble of eternal optimism. Some fans bandwagon on and off because they don't like the stress of losing. Some fans like to analyze coaching. Some fans like analyzing playcalling. Some like to look for areas the team can improve. Some like to point out all the positives and not dwell on negatives. Some like just watching and cheering.
Who are all these people on here that think they have a monopoly on knowing how a fan should be acting and feel entitled enough to tell people their posts - when well within the realm of the code of conduct and done in a respectable manner - that there opinion should be ostracized and invalidated because of the perceived tone of their posts? Or that such a label justifies ad hominem attacks on the poster in question who's attitude you feel doesnt fit you criteria for validation.
Then you don't read my posts. Considering I'm the guy who has been constantly harping for years that this team needs to be built for the marathon, not the sprint. Which is how ownership and Demps have ran things since acquiring AD. Or how everyone of my posts that criticize is typically qualified with acknowledging their season(or career) performance and weighing things against that.