.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 18 of 73 FirstFirst ... 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 68 ... LastLast
Results 426 to 450 of 1807

Thread: Pelicans finalizing trade for Asik

  1. #426
    Ive been a football guy all my life....So I might need some help with this.....Whatever happened to building through the draft? True, I know, 2 picks a year and only a handful of those picks go on to have even decent careers...But look at what the Redskins used to do in Dan Snyder's beginning....Sign people like Deon Sanders...Players that are on the downside of their careers. While Asik is just 28, so reasonably young, and somewhat talented, aren't draft picks more valuable? If you eat all of your salary cap with one player, where else do you go? Sorry...This is just the NFL guy in me coming out...But I believe in player development (which is why Im not a Rivers fan, and while I like Aminu for his hustle and defense, that ship sailed too)...But at some point in time, don't you have to start with young players and develop them into your style of play?

  2. #427
    Quote Originally Posted by Primetime View Post
    In that case, I'd take #2. But why can't we wait until mid-season when Ryan's going off? Why does everything need to be done now?

    My feeling is the following: this front office is making moves to save it's job, and it's hurting us. At this point, given all the trades, I'd rather keep the draft picks and have a much slower build. I'm excited about the team this year, but I can't help but think that in 2-3 years, we'll look back and say "why did we force it? we weren't championship contenders then"

    Which brings me to this: does our front office think it can win a championship in the next 2 years?
    Because we can't absorb Asik without shedding one of the 6 big contracts. Gordon, Ryno, or Rivers HAVE TO go before this trade can happen. Cant wait until February
    @mcnamara247

  3. #428
    Quote Originally Posted by greewe View Post
    I know. I lack patience though.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I am right there with ya. Trying to think of a way to stay busy for next few hours. Don't wanna just sit at the computer all day. Might actually ask the wife for a HoneyDew list

  4. #429
    ...we get to go McDonalds
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    Because we can't absorb Asik without shedding one of the 6 big contracts. Gordon, Ryno, or Rivers HAVE TO go before this trade can happen. Cant wait until February
    Sorry, I meant not making the Asik move and just waiting to see how this group would play out before moving any assets? I'm not sure I prefer a frontcourt of Asik & AD finishing games over AD & Ryno. Especially when I just saw the Spurs win a championship with one big and 4 shooters.

  5. #430
    ...we get to go McDonalds
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    I am right there with ya. Trying to think of a way to stay busy for next few hours. Don't wanna just sit at the computer all day. Might actually ask the wife for a HoneyDew list
    USA Soccer

  6. #431
    Hall of Famer jhow0036's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Metairie, La
    Posts
    749


  7. #432
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,323
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    They actually can't. You could only choose one of the three (Ajinca, Withey, and Babbitt)

    So, fine, choose 1 of those three - you would really choose route #1? I tend to disagree. Plus, option 2 could make you more flexible for Summer of 15
    If we traded Rivers and Ely (non-guaranteed), we could still keep Ajinca, Withey and maybe even Babbit at a projected $63.2 million cap (unless that has changed). Babbit would make it close, although if we had to dump his as well, it would not be a deal killer IMO. The difference between a solid 15-20 point scorer off the bench and the Babbit's and Smith's of the world is enormous. Those guys can be replaced with fringe FAs. Players like Anderson are not as easily replaced IMO.

  8. #433
    Quote Originally Posted by Primetime View Post
    In that case, I'd take #2. But why can't we wait until mid-season when Ryan's going off? Why does everything need to be done now?

    My feeling is the following: this front office is making moves to save it's job, and it's hurting us. At this point, given all the trades, I'd rather keep the draft picks and have a much slower build. I'm excited about the team this year, but I can't help but think that in 2-3 years, we'll look back and say "why did we force it? we weren't championship contenders then"

    Which brings me to this: does our front office think it can win a championship in the next 2 years?
    What about what we've done says we are forcing it? We traded the No. 6 pick in an awful draft and the no. 10 pick for an all-star point guard who is less than 1 month older than Lillard.

    Then we trade a late 1st for a top defensive center and one of the best total rebounders in the league.

    There is nothing forced about our trades. I see Dell being ahead of the curve and getting maximum value for assets that won't match what we got in return.

  9. #434
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    Gordon is the ideal. Stretching Gordon might be 2nd best scenario. There is no debate there.

    The debate comes down to Ryno route vs. Rivers route. Ryno route gives you very little flexibility to add depth to roster and even a starting SF. Rivers route forces you to lose Ryno but gives you ability to make roster super deep and even tackle 2015 FA class super hard.

    Its a good debate. I am starting to lean towards trading Ryno. Makes more sense for big picture. I just would ideally like for him to go East. I don't want him draining 8 threes on me 3-4 times a year and/or in the playoffs
    Would Sac be interested in Ryno and PJ for 8? Then we fill that role with Dougie Mcbuckets at a cheaper rate.

    Also, MM, answer this real quick. Was Asik's total contract against Houston's cap before trading? its just if he's traded it doesn't count against the whole cap?

  10. #435
    Quote Originally Posted by jhow0036 View Post

    I can't see us just giving away Rivers for nothing.

  11. #436
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    I am right there with ya. Trying to think of a way to stay busy for next few hours. Don't wanna just sit at the computer all day. Might actually ask the wife for a HoneyDew list
    Um. Find a local watering hole and put on the stars and stripes and take in some World Cup Soccer this morning.

  12. #437
    ...we get to go McDonalds
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by NOSportsFan View Post
    Ive been a football guy all my life....So I might need some help with this.....Whatever happened to building through the draft? True, I know, 2 picks a year and only a handful of those picks go on to have even decent careers...But look at what the Redskins used to do in Dan Snyder's beginning....Sign people like Deon Sanders...Players that are on the downside of their careers. While Asik is just 28, so reasonably young, and somewhat talented, aren't draft picks more valuable? If you eat all of your salary cap with one player, where else do you go? Sorry...This is just the NFL guy in me coming out...But I believe in player development (which is why Im not a Rivers fan, and while I like Aminu for his hustle and defense, that ship sailed too)...But at some point in time, don't you have to start with young players and develop them into your style of play?
    There's a disconnect in draft value between the NBA and the NFL. In the NFL, even the last 1st rounder has a good chance of being a starter. In the NBA, once you get to pick 5, your chances of hitting a quality starter isn't all that great.

    My issue with all this is that this will be 3 years in a row without a 1st rounder. Your chances of hitting one one of those guys is pretty good. I'm not a fan of making moves with 'this year' in mind. At this point, I'm not sure we wouldn't be better off with Vasquez, Lopez, 3 1st round draft picks and whatever $$$ was left over. My personal wish is that we would have just made the Jrue trade and not forced the issue.

  13. #438
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    If we traded Rivers and Ely (non-guaranteed), we could still keep Ajinca, Withey and maybe even Babbit at a projected $63.2 million cap (unless that has changed). Babbit would make it close, although if we had to dump his as well, it would not be a deal killer IMO. The difference between a solid 15-20 point scorer off the bench and the Babbit's and Smith's of the world is enormous. Those guys can be replaced with fringe FAs. Players like Anderson are not as easily replaced IMO.
    If Babbitt can give me 70% of Ryno, then its that remaining 30% vs player X, the pick, Morrow, and the MLE guy the way I see it. Again, if we can make the Rivers trade work as a three way and we can keep the MLE and the BAE, and our Bird Rights to guys, Withey, etc. that is the slam dunk move

  14. #439
    The Voice of Reason Contributor RaisingTheBar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    13,210
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    If Babbitt can give me 70% of Ryno, then its that remaining 30% vs player X, the pick, Morrow, and the MLE guy the way I see it. Again, if we can make the Rivers trade work as a three way and we can keep the MLE and the BAE, and our Bird Rights to guys, Withey, etc. that is the slam dunk move
    June 26, 2014 Updates

    Brian Windhorst: More dominos will fall in Asik-to-Pelicans deal. N.O. may move Austin Rivers to create cap space. One option: dad Doc owns trade exception Twitter @WindhorstESPN
    - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors/tag/new_....CMXM9qfJ.dpuf

    If we move Rivers, are we saying that Dell/Monty are comfortable with Roberts and Jackson as our options at backup PG?

  15. #440
    Band of Skulls & Neon Trees ramsters60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Westbank
    Posts
    3,416
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    I am right there with ya. Trying to think of a way to stay busy for next few hours. Don't wanna just sit at the computer all day. Might actually ask the wife for a HoneyDew list
    ummmm, would you like mine? It can be had for an expiring!
    "we might make dollars, but we don't necessarily make sense"

    "always be sincere....whether you mean it or not"

  16. #441
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,323
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    If Babbitt can give me 70% of Ryno, then its that remaining 30% vs player X, the pick, Morrow, and the MLE guy the way I see it. Again, if we can make the Rivers trade work as a three way and we can keep the MLE and the BAE, and our Bird Rights to guys, Withey, etc. that is the slam dunk move
    I cannot see Babbit giving you 50% of what Anderson gives you. Babbit is not a 12-16 point guy with 5-6 rpg. Nor is he anywhere near as clutch as Anderson. I don't see there even being a comparison between the two. We would not lose our bird rights to guys by keeping Anderson (other than maybe Morrow in your example IF we would even decide to keep him). In the scenario presented, I see keeping Anderson as a slam dunk move. If the scenario were changed, maybe it would be different.

  17. #442
    Quote Originally Posted by jhow0036 View Post

    I hope it's Gordon and not Austin. At least Rivers wants to be here!

  18. #443
    A Soulful Sports Fan Contributor Eman5805's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    29,859
    Quote Originally Posted by RaisingTheBar View Post
    June 26, 2014 Updates

    Brian Windhorst: More dominos will fall in Asik-to-Pelicans deal. N.O. may move Austin Rivers to create cap space. One option: dad Doc owns trade exception Twitter @WindhorstESPN
    - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors/tag/new_....CMXM9qfJ.dpuf

    If we move Rivers, are we saying that Dell/Monty are comfortable with Roberts and Jackson as our options at backup PG?
    That or...maybe another move that acquires a mid-round pick and we take Elfrid Payton...

  19. #444
    Trading Rivers would be stupid. It leaves us with no flexibility to add a sf. Gordon has to be the move. I'm sure Demps already has a deal lined up for Gordon.

  20. #445
    ...we get to go McDonalds
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Mythrol View Post
    What about what we've done says we are forcing it? We traded the No. 6 pick in an awful draft and the no. 10 pick for an all-star point guard who is less than 1 month older than Lillard.

    Then we trade a late 1st for a top defensive center and one of the best total rebounders in the league.

    There is nothing forced about our trades. I see Dell being ahead of the curve and getting maximum value for assets that won't match what we got in return.
    I like the Jrue trade. Hate the Tyreke and Asik trades.

    And if it was top 10 protected, I'd love the Asik trade. But you're gambling with this move. If something goes haywire, we just let go of a top 10 selection. You can't discount the possiblity of us sucking. We just sucked for the majority of the past year. I'd say there's a 20% we have a top ten pick next season. I just don't think that's worth it. I think waiting is the better option.

    These are clearly 'win now' moves -- we've brought on guys with NBA experience, but also NBA experience contracts, as opposed to bringing in rookies. What this all means is that in the event this 'build' doesn't work, we're left with no flexibility, and that's the crux of my issue. Flexibility is vital and now we have no flexibility and no guys on rookie contracts except for our superstar who in a few years may look at this and say "WTF, I have nothing around me." -- yes, we're still young, but none of these young guys have superstar potential. Jrue, Asik, Tyreke and are all good basketball players who will probably never see the All-Star game as Pelicans.

    What will have to happen for you guys to say that building a team this way is not worth it? If we don't get to the 2nd round of the playoffs in the next few years, will y'all say this was stupid? Will that make it worth it? Cause the way this team's conceived, it can't contend right now -- and we just moved our pieces for the future to play for the present.
    Last edited by Primetime; 06-26-2014 at 09:47 AM.

  21. #446
    Again, we ALL hope it is Gordon. If that was an option, I think it would be done.

    It likely comes down to Rivers vs. Ryno. Lets just see how it plays out and grade everything at that point

  22. #447
    Let Gordon be gone off this damn team

  23. #448
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    Again, if we can make the Rivers trade work as a three way and we can keep the MLE and the BAE, and our Bird Rights to guys, Withey, etc. that is the slam dunk move
    I didn't want to overlook this comment. If that was how this would play out, I would lose my mind. I would almost just ask Boston to absorb them to just make it work. I hate that Gordon's contract makes us have to just give Rivers away but I'd rather give Rivers away and keep Ryno and our MLE and all the other stuff.

  24. #449
    Banned Kurgan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Italia/Žilina/Praha
    Posts
    3,529
    The day i have to be away without internet for nearly all morning and afternoon, and it's a pandemonium everywhere. Timing is definitely not my forte.

  25. #450
    Jimeert Freedet 4 Prez IamQuailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NERLA
    Posts
    7,080
    Thank you to whoever blamed me for spreading the rumor to TigerDroppings. I don't even have an account on that craphole site. Appreciate it a lot fellas.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •