
Originally Posted by
Kurgan
You can talk about his choices of who to send on the court, i won't argue, but when we didn't have youngsters and people who have yet not understood what a defensive rotation is, we were not so horrid on defence. We were fourth in the league with points allowed per game in 2010/11, 12th in opponent 3 fg%, 13th in opponent fg%. Much the same the next year in allowed fg% but second best overall for opponent 3 fg% allowed and 7th in ppg allowed.
This year we are 4th worst in fg%, 13th in 3 fg% and 4th worst in points.
Something doesn't add up, don't you think? The coach is the same, the players have changed, so how could we be a good to more than good team defensively then and suck so much now?