.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 58 of 88 FirstFirst ... 8 48 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 68 ... LastLast
Results 1,426 to 1,450 of 2192

Thread: Pelicans to meet with Tyreke Evans (offer has been made)

  1. #1426
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicantoo View Post
    Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA 35s

    Chase Budinger has reached agreement on a three-year, $16 million deal to return to Minnesota, league source tells Y! Sports.

    Budinger's gone. The chips start to fall.
    The Pelicans never had a chance with both Webster and Budinger. We weren't going to overpay for their services so anything reasonable would mean that they'd return to the teams they were quite happy with.

  2. #1427
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    Personally, I think Dell is swinging for the fences here and even if it falls through, he knows he can get plenty of value around July 20th when the musical chairs stop. Remember how late in the game we got Lopez last season?

    Tyreke can have all the time he wants, since he is the only big fish we want and/or can afford. If you can't get him, use that same money and load up on value contracts later.

    Love the strategy
    I think Benson told Dell he would put up the money if we make this team exciting to watch. Let's face it. A Memphis Grizzlies grit and grind type of team isn't going to sell tickets in a city with a NFL franchise like the Saints who are arguably the most fun team to watch in the league with their fast pace offense. Makes sense and there is no doubt in my mind that ticket sales will skyrocket as long as they put on a show.

  3. #1428
    One of the small forwards in this tier will sign in three weeks for 1/2 the price these guys are getting and will perform as well or better.

    I want THAT guy!
    @mcnamara247

  4. #1429
    Quote Originally Posted by Nola Hornet View Post
    The Pelicans never had a chance with both Webster and Budinger. We weren't going to overpay for their services so anything reasonable would mean that they'd return to the teams they were quite happy with.
    Agreed! The one thing I'm happy with is that the value of this pack is (hopefully) going to continue to seep downward. Our room exception is looking viable for someone on the bottom of the pack.

  5. #1430
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    One of the small forwards in this tier will sign in three weeks for 1/2 the price these guys are getting and will perform as well or better.

    I want THAT guy!
    *Thumbs-Up*

  6. #1431
    The Franchise Contributor GeauxPelicans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    2,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicantoo View Post
    Mark Heisler ‏@MarkHeisler 11m

    Don't worry if you're confused, #NBA GMs right w/you. Bidding fever sees Kings think about maxing out Iggy after #Pelicans offer Tyreke $44M

    Max for Iggy? That's gonna be a regret by year 2 or so, but they need his veteran leadership more than any other team in the league. Plus try need a SF. Pretty good fit, but terrible over pay.

  7. #1432
    Quote Originally Posted by GeauxPelicans View Post
    Max for Iggy? That's gonna be a regret by year 2 or so, but they need his veteran leadership more than any other team in the league. Plus try need a SF. Pretty good fit, but terrible over pay.
    I actually think Iggy would be great for that team. He's everything they need. They don't need him for his scoring abilities. They need him for his ability to defend, lead, and teach.

  8. #1433
    Quote Originally Posted by Nola Hornet View Post
    I actually think Iggy would be great for that team. He's everything they need. They don't need him for his scoring abilities. They need him for his ability to defend, lead, and teach.
    Hell that's why I wanted him.

    Definitely prefer Tyreke though, especially at a lower price.

  9. #1434
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,327
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    One of the small forwards in this tier will sign in three weeks for 1/2 the price these guys are getting and will perform as well or better.

    I want THAT guy!
    All 30 teams would want THAT guy. I don't think any team signs a player thinking they could get someone for 1/2 the price later who would perform as well or better than the player they just signed. Unfortunately, they do not have a crystal ball.

  10. #1435
    The Franchise Contributor GeauxPelicans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    2,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Nola Hornet View Post
    I actually think Iggy would be great for that team. He's everything they need. They don't need him for his scoring abilities. They need him for his ability to defend, lead, and teach.
    Agreed, that's why I said I like the fit, but the max for Iggy is gonna be real ugly by the middle of that contract.

  11. #1436
    Quote Originally Posted by GeauxPelicans View Post
    Max for Iggy? That's gonna be a regret by year 2 or so, but they need his veteran leadership more than any other team in the league. Plus try need a SF. Pretty good fit, but terrible over pay.
    If Dell met with Iggy and found his expectation to be a max deal, then I couldn't be happier with our contract to 'Reke. I just wonder where the Kings go from here, seems foolish to pay that kind of $ when they have no real shot at winning anytime soon. Definitely fits, but there aren't many pieces that wouldn't be an upgrade for them.

  12. #1437
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    1,186
    Quote Originally Posted by BallSoHard View Post
    Read my points about saying the longer a player waits the less money he gets. This proves my point on that piece. If waiting = more money, then way did Budigner sign?

    And sure, we lost out on a Chase Budinger but there's tons of other guys in his tier that are still out there. He was just one who didn't want to wait until the dominos fall. Personal preference. Now, can you prove or believe we had substantially more money on on the table?

    Everyone agrees here that if Team A and Team b offer the same money, but team B offers it sooner without any string attached, then team b wins, right? We can agree to this right ?

    The argument is:

    Does Dell run parallel negotiations? (I think he does and is upfront in the process)
    Does the longer you wait on a player mean the player gets more money ? (I don't think this typically holds true)
    Is waiting until 5 days before they can even sign outlandish? (I don't think so)
    If player is offered substantially more money elsewhere but they want to see how the chips fall, does a player sign the cheaper deal because its on the table or do they wait? (I think they wait).


    No one is going to get into a bidding war for Budinger. Now off the market are him, Webster and soon Brewer and others, while we would be waiting if there were 'no rush' to determine what's going on.

    Yes, the longer you wait the more likely the player is to get more money. That's what happens while you 'wait' with your offer on the table, they shop and it either goes higher or they take yours...it certainly doesn't go lower so higher is the only possibility.

    I'm baffled at how you don't see this as arguing against yourself:

    "If player is offered substantially more money elsewhere but they want to see how the chips fall, does a player sign the cheaper deal because its on the table or do they wait?"

    Implying a player will wait to determine whether they can get more money from other teams before going back to the 'on the table' offer. In other words, driving the money higher or at worst staying the same.

    "Does the longer you wait on a player mean the player gets more money ? (I don't think this typically holds true)"

    ...yet here you say that usually they don't get more money when your previous statement implies they either get more money or take the offer that's on the table (meaning it can only possibly go up)??

    I'm curious as to when a player has waited and recieved less money. A player that was actually wanted. There are 30 teams, one player...players that are sought after get teams into bidding wars. That's how it works.
    Last edited by saintsinNO; 07-02-2013 at 04:42 PM.

  13. #1438
    Quote Originally Posted by saintsinNO View Post
    No one is going to get into a bidding war for Budinger. Now off the market are him, Webster and soon Brewer and others, while we would be waiting if there were 'no rush' to determine what's going on.

    Yes, the longer you wait the more likely the player is to get more money. That's what happens while you 'wait' with your offer on the table, they shop and it either goes higher or they take yours...it certainly doesn't go lower so higher is the only possibility.

    I'm baffled at how you don't see this as arguing against yourself:

    "If player is offered substantially more money elsewhere but they want to see how the chips fall, does a player sign the cheaper deal because its on the table or do they wait?"

    Implying a player will wait to determine whether they can get more money from other teams before going back to the 'on the table' offer. In other words, driving the money higher or at worst staying the same.

    Does the longer you wait on a player mean the player gets more money ? (I don't think this typically holds true)

    ...yet here you say that usually they don't get more money??

    I'm curious as to when a player has waited and recieved less money. A player that was actually wanted. There are 30 teams, one player...players that are sought after get teams into bidding wars. That's how it works.
    Let's just agree to disagree? No point in continuing this conversation. You've said what you've wanted to say, i've said what i've wanted to say. You think you're right, i think i'm right; nothing to be gained here.

    "I don't know if people know — I dislocated my pinkie finger. And [Tyreke] told me, 'You wanna go home or you wanna be here?' I want to be here. And he said, 'All right, then go tape it up and let's play. Let's go. We not stoppin' at no stores. Straight gas. That's what we do, just keep going.'"

    http://thebasketbawlblog.com/

  14. #1439
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,327
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicantoo View Post
    If Dell met with Iggy and found his expectation to be a max deal, then I couldn't be happier with our contract to 'Reke. I just wonder where the Kings go from here, seems foolish to pay that kind of $ when they have no real shot at winning anytime soon. Definitely fits, but there aren't many pieces that wouldn't be an upgrade for them.
    There is no way the Kings max him out. I just think that was someone guessing.

  15. #1440
    For...ev...er... The JNR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Mid-city
    Posts
    2,545
    Quote Originally Posted by PowerPel View Post
    Just to let you know they are getting ready to talk about the Pels on ESPN Around The Horn. I hope it is positive.
    What was the verdict?

  16. #1441
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    1,186
    Quote Originally Posted by The JNR View Post
    What was the verdict?
    Didn't watch but I'd imagine Tony asked about our potential signing of Evans and move in the draft and the panelists spent 2 seconds dismissing that before talking extensively about how awkward it is to say "Pelicans" and then a commercial break.

  17. #1442
    For...ev...er... The JNR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Mid-city
    Posts
    2,545
    I've noticed Wilbon is not a fan of the team. He's talked about us needing to move or contract on more than one occasion.

  18. #1443
    Formerly "Rocket Man" groundpatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Mandeville, LA
    Posts
    5,371
    Quote Originally Posted by The JNR View Post
    What was the verdict?
    Basically a 50/50 split if he's a good fit. MacMullan and Plaschke think the league is moving to 3 guard norm, and that he fits that role here. Paige/Gutierrez thinks hes still a good player, but think it's too much $ for a backup, even though they mentioned it's potentially for a Manu Ginobli-type role.
    Last edited by groundpatty; 07-02-2013 at 04:51 PM.

  19. #1444
    Quote Originally Posted by The JNR View Post
    I've noticed Wilbon is not a fan of the team. He's talked about us needing to move or contract on more than one occasion.
    Noticed this as well. He seems a little late to the party. He keeps talking about us moving even after we signed the lease.

  20. #1445
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    1,186
    Quote Originally Posted by The JNR View Post
    I've noticed Wilbon is not a fan of the team. He's talked about us needing to move or contract on more than one occasion.
    I find that most on ESPN don't really talk about much outside of their big 10 topics, they just spout off ignorance. We just got a new owner, rebranded, have probably the most promising young player in the game, an extremely young roster, great coach, new facility...yet we should be contracted...yeah ok, Wilbon.

    They like Tiger, Lebron, A-Rod, The Heat, Yankees, Cowboys and Romo...whatever other drama is going on, currently Hernandez. Actual sports you are better off on the internet.

  21. #1446
    Formerly "Rocket Man" groundpatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Mandeville, LA
    Posts
    5,371
    Quote Originally Posted by saintsinNO View Post
    Didn't watch but I'd imagine Tony asked about our potential signing of Evans and move in the draft and the panelists spent 2 seconds dismissing that before talking extensively about how awkward it is to say "Pelicans" and then a commercial break.
    To be fair, they actually didn't make fun of the name at all.

    Considering what ESPN has normally had to say about this franchise over the last few years... it was amazing how they just talked about our FA activity like we were just another team. It's a great problem to have.

  22. #1447
    Quote Originally Posted by saintsinNO View Post
    Good for you and think what you will, but yeah. If we are interested in Player X while we don't know what Evans will do and Player X wants money that will overlap with Evans' potential deal we tell him that. Then when another team offers the same or a little less, but it's actually on the table, Player X will take that 100% of the time. We lose when Evans waits and doesn't take our offer.

    You're arguing that there's no rush on wanting to know if a guy is going to accept the second biggest chunk of money your team is paying? During FA period? That makes sense to you? Of course there is a rush.
    You are wrong. It doesn't happen 100% of the time.

  23. #1448
    The Franchise PolishFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    2,310
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    One of the small forwards in this tier will sign in three weeks for 1/2 the price these guys are getting and will perform as well or better.

    I want THAT guy!
    me too!!

  24. #1449
    Updating a previous item, sources tell the Sacramento Bee that the Kings are considering matching Tyreke Evans' reported four-year, $44 million offer from the Pelicans.

    http://www.rotoworld.com/sports/nba/basketball

    "I'm not going to allow my putative owner to answer that question, this is an NBA related press conference. Paul Tagliabue and Roger Goodell have collectively sung their praises of Tom and if uh ESPN has a problem with that tell Mr. Skipper to call me at my office."

  25. #1450
    Exhibit C Nola3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,201
    Quote Originally Posted by PelsFan2313 View Post
    Updating a previous item, sources tell the Sacramento Bee that the Kings are considering matching Tyreke Evans' reported four-year, $44 million offer from the Pelicans.

    http://www.rotoworld.com/sports/nba/basketball
    Smokescreen or legitimate consideration?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •