.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: Larry Sanders

  1. #1

    Trade Idea Larry Sanders

    I saw this trade idea posted on At the Hive, and found it interesting.

    It went along the lines of Vasquez, Lopez, and a 2014 first-round pick for Larry Sanders.

    My questions are:
    -Is the trade realistic for both parties?
    -If not, which party is losing out?
    -Is Sanders untouchable?
    -Thoughts on this front court combination moving forward?

    Roster moving forward:

    /Rivers/Roberts
    Gordon/
    /Miller
    Davis/Anderson/Thomas
    Sanders/Smith

    6th pick in the draft + ~24M in cap space...

    "I'm not going to allow my putative owner to answer that question, this is an NBA related press conference. Paul Tagliabue and Roger Goodell have collectively sung their praises of Tom and if uh ESPN has a problem with that tell Mr. Skipper to call me at my office."

  2. #2
    That is a horrible trade for us.

  3. #3


    Seems like the perfect fit next to Davis.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicans_fan_504 View Post
    That is a horrible trade for us.
    No, it's a great trade for us. Sanders could very well be a top 5 center next year. Of course, we'd have to temper ourselves with the excessive cap space since he'll be getting a $12m+/yr contract next season, but we could always trade for an expiring guy like Deng or Granger for a season (shouldn't cost much, Chicago will be in the tax with a cheap owner and I'm pretty sure Indy would prefer ~$10m in cap space than an aging Granger coming off an injury) , or if GSW wants to go all in on a guy like Howard, take on Biedrins+Jefferson and Klay Thompson in exchange for the cap space.

    I'd give the Larry SAAANNDEERRSSS!! trade three thumbs up:

  5. #5
    I wrote this about you Mr. West's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    'Round Shreveport
    Posts
    4,171
    I don't know if Milwaukee would do it, I would though.
    @DanielVeuleman

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. West View Post
    I don't know if Milwaukee would do it, I would though.
    Probably wouldn't. If they are looking to resign Ellis, they obviously aren't trying to blow it up.

  7. #7
    I wrote this about you Mr. West's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    'Round Shreveport
    Posts
    4,171
    I agree. But should they be open to this trade I'd jump on it.

  8. #8
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    Quote Originally Posted by THRILLHOUSE View Post
    No, it's a great trade for us. Sanders could very well be a top 5 center next year. Of course, we'd have to temper ourselves with the excessive cap space since he'll be getting a $12m+/yr contract next season, but we could always trade for an expiring guy like Deng or Granger for a season (shouldn't cost much, Chicago will be in the tax with a cheap owner and I'm pretty sure Indy would prefer ~$10m in cap space than an aging Granger coming off an injury) , or if GSW wants to go all in on a guy like Howard, take on Biedrins+Jefferson and Klay Thompson in exchange for the cap space.

    I'd give the Larry SAAANNDEERRSSS!! trade three thumbs up:

    Burke/Rivers
    Gordon/Mason or vet
    FA/Miller
    AD/Anderson
    Sanders/Smith

    I don't like it. I LOVE it.
    Wherehappens.

  9. #9
    Trade makes us worse, but at least we'd still have a high lottery pick in one of the most hyped drafts ever... oh wait

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Sovereign View Post
    Trade makes us worse, but at least we'd still have a high lottery pick in one of the most hyped drafts ever... oh wait
    This, I'm glad someone else see's it, no way we trade our 2014. We would give the Bucks a good pg a decent center with a good contract and a lottery pick in a loaded draft for Larry Sanders lol

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicans_fan_504 View Post
    This, I'm glad someone else see's it, no way we trade our 2014. We would give the Bucks a good pg a decent center with a good contract and a lottery pick in a loaded draft for Larry Sanders lol
    Sanders is a significantly better player than Vasquez and Lopez. And yes, the 2014 draft will be good, but it may surprise you that some people would prefer to have a good team every once in a while as opposed to getting excited about what high lottery pick we'll get NEXT year. Sanders/AD gives us one of the best defensive front courts in the NBA at a combined age 4 years older than Jason Kidd. It also frees up $4m in salary this season to either help fill out the roster with long term FA's, or as I mentioned earlier, allows us even more room to take on bad expiring contracts for a year in exchange for picks/decent young players. I really think you're underestimating Sanders.

  12. #12
    I would do this trade. Championships aren't built by draft picks alone, they take solid fa signings and trades. Look at the Spurs, Lakers, Miami, Boston, and Detroit. Sure they had one of their own high lottery picks they built around, but the rest were moves made in the later part of the draft and in FA. If AD progresses, this will be a very solid move. People wet their pants at the thought of teaming AD up with a McGee/ athletic Center type, well...
    If you Jimmer it, they will come.

  13. #13
    I would do it IF we could buy the mavs pick so we could draft saric, we need a SF so bad and if we give up next years pick we wont be able to get one because no one will be selling their pick next year, too great of a draft, plus saric would go well with davis and sanders since he is such a good passer

    burke
    gordon
    saric
    davis
    sanders

    offense with burke gordon saric defense with gordon davis sanders, nice

  14. #14
    I would do this as long as we could make it top 10 protected next year. We're a much better team next year by upgrading at PG and signing a servicable SF, but we could easily be a bottom 3 team with a season ending injury to any position. We would be incredibly thin at just about every position with that move.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by THRILLHOUSE View Post
    Sanders is a significantly better player than Vasquez and Lopez. And yes, the 2014 draft will be good, but it may surprise you that some people would prefer to have a good team every once in a while as opposed to getting excited about what high lottery pick we'll get NEXT year. Sanders/AD gives us one of the best defensive front courts in the NBA at a combined age 4 years older than Jason Kidd. It also frees up $4m in salary this season to either help fill out the roster with long term FA's, or as I mentioned earlier, allows us even more room to take on bad expiring contracts for a year in exchange for picks/decent young players. I really think you're underestimating Sanders.
    Tell me how adding Sanders makes up a better team, Lopez avg more points, shoot a better % from the field, and avg only 1 less block a game then Sanders. Sanders will not make us a playoff team next year so why give up a lottery pick

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicans_fan_504 View Post
    Tell me how adding Sanders makes up a better team, Lopez avg more points, shoot a better % from the field, and avg only 1 less block a game then Sanders. Sanders will not make us a playoff team next year so why give up a lottery pick
    Sanders is arguably the best rim protector in the league. It's not about blocks. It's about deterring shooters, and he is right up there. Moreover, he is much quicker in PnR defense, where Lopez sucks. Most importantly, he is a MUCH better rebounder than Lopez, who sucks.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by endlessHIMdark View Post
    I would do this as long as we could make it top 10 protected next year. We're a much better team next year by upgrading at PG and signing a servicable SF, but we could easily be a bottom 3 team with a season ending injury to any position. We would be incredibly thin at just about every position with that move.
    ya i would def do that, but i dont think they would do top 10 protected thats a lot, maybe they would do top 8

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by HornetGuru View Post
    ya i would def do that, but i dont think they would do top 10 protected thats a lot, maybe they would do top 8
    Personally, I'd be fine with that. I'm not a GM or anything but I would just be worried about losing a top 5 pick because of injuries.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by endlessHIMdark View Post
    I would do this as long as we could make it top 10 protected next year. We're a much better team next year by upgrading at PG and signing a servicable SF, but we could easily be a bottom 3 team with a season ending injury to any position. We would be incredibly thin at just about every position with that move.
    We'd have the #6 pick this year and close to $20m in cap space to fill out the roster.

  20. #20
    They're not looking to trade Sanders. He's their center of the future. They're satisfied. They don't need a point guard or a center. The first-round pick is not important and can be a late one. I'd do it for us, but they won't.

  21. #21
    Banned Kurgan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Italia/Žilina/Praha
    Posts
    3,529
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelicans_fan_504 View Post
    Tell me how adding Sanders makes up a better team, Lopez avg more points, shoot a better % from the field, and avg only 1 less block a game then Sanders. Sanders will not make us a playoff team next year so why give up a lottery pick
    Hell have you ever watched sanders play? Comparing him to lopez is like comparing chris paul to josé calderón, c'mon now.

    I'd do the trade (if we could get some sort of protection on the pick) but i don't see a reason why the bucks would do it

  22. #22
    Yep -- I don't see how Milwaukee gets excited about this one but I'd do it. To be honest (even though it hurts me to say this), I'd even do this trade:

    Sanders for Anderson

    I can then feel confident about drafting Burke (since in a defensive system that only needs him to funnel to the help isn't as hard as attacking the ball handler). Hone him behind Vasquez (until it gets clear he can take over). We can still then trade the 2014 pick for something else (or maybe not at all). We sign Henderson and Budinger (hopefully, they'll agree) roll out next year with:

    Vasquez/Burke
    Gordon/Henderson/Rivers (Sad )
    Budinger/Henderson
    Davis/Smith
    Sanders/Lopez

  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by nikkoewan View Post
    Yep -- I don't see how Milwaukee gets excited about this one but I'd do it. To be honest (even though it hurts me to say this), I'd even do this trade:

    Sanders for Anderson

    I can then feel confident about drafting Burke (since in a defensive system that only needs him to funnel to the help isn't as hard as attacking the ball handler). Hone him behind Vasquez (until it gets clear he can take over). We can still then trade the 2014 pick for something else (or maybe not at all). We sign Henderson and Budinger (hopefully, they'll agree) roll out next year with:

    Vasquez/Burke
    Gordon/Henderson/Rivers (Sad )
    Budinger/Henderson
    Davis/Smith
    Sanders/Lopez
    they wouldnt do sanders for ryno straight up, maybe GV and ryno for sanders which i would prob still do.

  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. West View Post
    I don't know if Milwaukee would do it, I would though.
    They would never give up Sanders unless they were getting Chris Bosh or someone who was an absolute freak. Visit their website, he's their brand right now. It would be on par with us considering trading Anthony Davis for picks.

  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by mxlad1 View Post
    They would never give up Sanders unless they were getting Chris Bosh or someone who was an absolute freak. Visit their website, he's their brand right now. It would be on par with us considering trading Anthony Davis for picks.

    "I don't know if people know — I dislocated my pinkie finger. And [Tyreke] told me, 'You wanna go home or you wanna be here?' I want to be here. And he said, 'All right, then go tape it up and let's play. Let's go. We not stoppin' at no stores. Straight gas. That's what we do, just keep going.'"

    http://thebasketbawlblog.com/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •