.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 38

Thread: Trade Deadline Discussion

  1. #1

    Trade Deadline Discussion

    Setting up a thread for trade deadline discussion.

    This organization seems inept at selling. We should absolutely trade CJ McCullum as his value is the highest it will ever be as a Pelican. We will lose him for nothing after next year if not. Clearly no one wants to give anything of value for BI as an injury prone rental, so we should just let his deal expire. We may just see a salary dump trade of a couple lesser role players to get under the luxury tax after all the previous chatter.

    My personal favorite trade proposal as I mentioned a few months ago is a swap of BI and CJ McCullum for Zach Lavine and an expiring Lonzo Ball. I cannot imagine a better deal on the market for Chicago who is shopping Lavine and Vucevic. The move allows us to get under the luxury tax and have a BI level player with better 3 point shooting to play alongside Zion, Murray, Trey Murphy, Missi, and Herb (6th man) next season, hopefully guided by a competent coach. That is still a quality NBA lineup if the Pels can get a competent coach. Chicago gets 2 quality NBA players for 1. They can reasonably re-sign BI. Its a win for both sides.
    Last edited by Darkhorse985; 01-25-2025 at 12:03 AM.

  2. #2
    To be honest, it's hard to assess what this trade deadline will be given teams and players are still figuring out the apron's ecosystems.

    Given the pelicans situation I will advocate against taking long term contracts unless it allows the team to obtain assets in the form of rookie's scale contract or futur draft picks.

  3. #3
    Apparently the Apron makes folks cautious and most teams are waiting to see what happens with Jimmy Bulter.

  4. #4
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!! donato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,664
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkhorse985 View Post
    My personal favorite trade proposal as I mentioned a few months ago is a swap of BI and CJ McCullum for Zach Lavine and an expiring Lonzo Ball.
    Jake Madison was hyping up that exact trade recently (maybe you're him). I'm on board with it.

  5. #5
    The aprons are game changers for the team building.
    Previously if you wanted to win, basically you had to identify your star and your most valued starters and pay them all the max by using their bird rights and then add role players with the exception available or draft picks. That's how all the previous championship team were built, see Denver, GS, Milwaukee, Boston etc.

    Now with the aprons even if you are a deep pocketed owner, you have to keep control of the cost on all roster except the superstar. That's why the value of second options players like BI have plummeted. They use to be paid the same money as the franchise player in the previous system and it's no longer sustainable with the aprons.
    Basically the number 2 or 3 options are going to see their salary decrease in order to have enough money to build the rest of the roster while avoiding the apron's restrictions. They're the biggest losers for the new CBA and until they adjust to the new reality of their value, no team will take on their contract. Hence limiting the chance of seeing blockbuster trade.
    Last edited by Blattman; 01-28-2025 at 05:59 AM.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Blattman View Post
    The aprons are game changers for the team building.
    Previously if you wanted to win, basically you had to identify your star and your most valued starters and pay them all the max by using their bird rights and then add role players with the exception available or draft picks. That's how all the previous championship team were built, see Denver, GS, Milwaukee, Boston etc.

    Now with the aprons even if you are a deep pocketed owner, you have to keep control of the cost on all roster except the superstar. That's why the value of second options players like BI have plummeted. They use to be paid the same money as the franchise player in the previous system and it's no longer sustainable with the aprons.
    Basically the number 2 or 3 options are going to see their salary decrease in order to have enough money to build the rest of the roster while avoiding the apron's restrictions. They're the biggest losers for the new CBA and until they adjust to the new reality of their value, no team will take on their contract. Hence limiting the chance of seeing blockbuster trade.
    Which means we will probably end up resigning Ingram to a less than max deal. Or another team will in the off season.

  7. #7
    Kings interested in trading Fox!



    Give em Ingram and ????? to make this trade work?

  8. #8

  9. #9
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!! donato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,664
    My wildly complicated attempt at reshaping things / blowing things up. Think of the incoming guys with 1 year left purely as expirings though let's pretend we keep Trey Lyles:





    Here's 12 deep plus we have a very high (impactful?) draft pick incoming.

    D. Fox / J. Alvarado
    T. Murphy / G. Dick / J. Hawkins / K. Huerter / B. Boston
    K. Murray
    H. Jones / T. Lyles
    Y. Missi / I. Stewart
    Last edited by donato; 01-29-2025 at 12:21 AM.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by donato View Post
    My wildly complicated attempt at reshaping things / blowing things up. Think of the incoming guys with 1 year left purely as expirings though let's pretend we keep Trey Lyles:





    Here's 12 deep plus we have a very high (impactful?) draft pick incoming.

    D. Fox / J. Alvarado
    T. Murphy / G. Dick / J. Hawkins / K. Huerter / B. Boston
    K. Murray
    H. Jones / T. Lyles
    Y. Missi / I. Stewart
    This would be the most complex trade in NBA history lol

  11. #11
    The one good thing is Missi seems to be the player we needed him to be and we can afford to ignore the position for a while. While Jonas was a very good player, you needed another guy to compliment him in certain situations and Larry Nance fell off hard after his first year. So hypothetically, the players you are mostly looking to trade (if at all) are Ingram, Zion and CJ for either a reset or to rebalance the squad. Murray/Herb/ZionorBI/Trey/Missi is still a core you can work with and salvage if that is the direction you want to go. But you have to build a team that can win with and without one of BI or Zion. They haven't proven they can stay healthy. That should be the goal. Build a team that can get as high a seed as possible and ride the home floor as long as possible. We need to be a much better regular season team. Play-ins make it that much harder for you. We cannot continue to barely get by.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by donato View Post
    My wildly complicated attempt at reshaping things / blowing things up. Think of the incoming guys with 1 year left purely as expirings though let's pretend we keep Trey Lyles:





    Here's 12 deep plus we have a very high (impactful?) draft pick incoming.

    D. Fox / J. Alvarado
    T. Murphy / G. Dick / J. Hawkins / K. Huerter / B. Boston
    K. Murray
    H. Jones / T. Lyles
    Y. Missi / I. Stewart
    Awesome accounting in that trade, but the Pels come out the worst by far in that deal if no significant draft picks are attached.

  13. #13
    Snarky Optimistic Guy msusousaphone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lake Charles
    Posts
    4,796
    NBA ratings are down and suddenly Luka gets traded to LA for only AD....because the league isn't rigged. I promise.

  14. #14
    Such a wild and sudden trade.

  15. #15
    Fox to the Spurs
    Lavine to the Kings

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by markid View Post
    Fox to the Spurs
    Lavine to the Kings
    That trade was fair. The Kings got a haul and a very good player in Lavine. I would put Lavine in the same tier NBA player as Fox tbh.

  17. #17
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!! donato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,664

  18. #18
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkhorse985 View Post
    That trade was fair. The Kings got a haul and a very good player in Lavine. I would put Lavine in the same tier NBA player as Fox tbh.
    What? Not even close.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    What? Not even close.
    Fox is somewhat overrated. There is a reason the Kings traded him. He is a definite upgrade to the Spurs, but he is very much a Zach Lavine level player. Their stats are very comparable, and Lavine is a better shooter.

  20. #20
    Wow, attaching draft compensation to move a useful backup center like Daniel Theis is the move the Pels make? Nice. This team is so bad… Do you think a team like the Lakers would have given a 2nd for a serviceable center?

  21. #21
    Theis has been traded away with a pick attached. Off he goes.

  22. #22
    The Franchise
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Long Beach
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkhorse985 View Post
    Wow, attaching draft compensation to move a useful backup center like Daniel Theis is the move the Pels make? Nice. This team is so bad… Do you think a team like the Lakers would have given a 2nd for a serviceable center?
    I think so. They're desperate for a big.

  23. #23
    Starting Lineup for the Pels next season if no one ruptures an Achilles or tears an ACL between now and the end of the season…

    PG: CJ McCullum
    SG: Trey Murphy III
    SF: Herb Jones
    PF: Zion Williamson (probably will see him actually play sometime after January, maybe)
    C: Yves Missi

    Please may we find an experienced NBA head coach with skins on the wall to lead this team.
    Last edited by Darkhorse985; 02-05-2025 at 02:28 PM.

  24. #24
    For anyone wondering, Theis and a future 2nd was traded to OKC for a bag of chips. Salary dump to get under the tax.

    Can someone remind Griff what the definition of insanity is?

  25. #25
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkhorse985 View Post
    Fox is somewhat overrated. There is a reason the Kings traded him. He is a definite upgrade to the Spurs, but he is very much a Zach Lavine level player. Their stats are very comparable, and Lavine is a better shooter.
    No, they traded him because Rich Paul pulled his normal scorched earth trade demand ways.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •