Yea they being a bit ridiculous. They need to just take their L and make a trade for the good of the team vibe.
Printable View
We couldn?t even get a protected first from Chicago for Lonzo (not even Markkanen for Lonzo), yet they want a first for Lauri? Ha. Hahahah.
"What likely happens to the teams that helped Lowry (Toronto) and Ball (New Orleans) get to new destinations?"
— Oleh Kosel (@OlehKosel) August 10, 2021
"If the Bogdanović case is a trusty guide … nothing."
Hit the link for more from @TheSteinLine https://t.co/PFmXhmIRkl
I apologize if this was said before but the thing about the Pels side is there was no malice. No ill-will. If anything, it's the Pels who were screwed by the Bulls and Rich Paul. If anything, if the Bulls have to give up draft pick compensation, it should go to the Pels. The fact that Lonzo agreed to a contract with the Bulls prior to Free Agency complletely derailed the Pelicans ability to extract any value in a Lonzo sign and trade.
Conspiracy theory, it was Griff who complained to the league about the tampering. Is it coincidence that the two players that the tampering allegations are centered around are also the two players who were the centerpieces of the Pels offseason?
Josh Hart has now taken “New Orleans Pelicans #3” out of his bio pic.twitter.com/uVm4Gt4IiS
— Pelicans Discord (@PelicansDiscord) August 10, 2021
For those into this sort of thing. I personally would be fine just getting a super protected first and calling it a day
I haven't watched many Wolves games, but has Culver been that terrible? From 6th pick in 2019 to being shopped around for a 2nd rd pick, per reports.
It's because he's owed 6 mil this year with a TO next year for 8 mil. In comparison, Naji Marshall is the same size and only one year older and is making 1.5 mil next season and 1.7 mil the following with a TO for 2 mil in 2023 (wow thats an incredible contract).
Culver last season:
34 games, 15 mpg, 5.3 ppg, 3 rpg, 1 apg, 41/25/60% shooting
Naji last season:
32 games, 21 mpg, 7.7 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 2.8 apg, 39/35/70% shooting
You'd much rather give developmental minutes to Naji on that contract than Culver, imo.
So I'm going to assume Devonte Graham will be the starting pg this year. Not like that is foreign to him since he's started >80% of his games the last 2 years.
That means the thin spot shifts to SG. There is a potential S&T player that would slot nicely right in if they don't bring back Hart. Wont say who that is for fear of the jinx. Plus that potential S&T partner could really use a Josh Hart on it.
Will be interesting to see what finally happens. This Hart situation been eerily quiet.
And we got Point Zion/Ingram, but hopefully we won't overindulge on that rotation. Put Graham and Murphy out there as catch and shoot threats
Graham, Murphy, and Ingram is a serious catch and shoot threat.
Last year catch and shoot.
Ingram - 42%
Graham - 42%
Murphy - 41%
This is some serious shooting.
There's a world where you combine Sato and Hart's salaries to trade for Hield without having to take him in the TPE. Then you still have the 17.5 million dollar TPE to play with at the deadline with a lineup of:
PG- NAW, Kira
SG- Hield, Graham, Didi
SF- BI, Murphy, Naji, Temple
PF- Zion, Herb
C- Jonas, Jax, Willy
If there's only a 19 day wait until re-aggregation, then the dream still lives. And that would apply to non-Buddy players as well.
— Shamit Dua (@FearTheBrown) August 10, 2021
In other words, if the Hart situation doesn't resolve itself in the next 2 weeks, something is up! https://t.co/Vz1kZF1mQM
I don't think Shamit has confirmed this quite yet but here's the current hypothetical
A small ball line up with Graham , Hield, Ingram, Murphy, and Zion would be wild.
Or go Tall Boi with Point Zion
Zion
Murphy
Ingram
Hayes
Jonas
Some interesting versatility. Really don't need Lauri if Murphy is really that far ahead of the curve. Just live being smallish, I suppose.
Free agent G Dennis Schroder has agreed to a one-year deal with the Boston Celtics, sources tell ESPN.
— Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) August 10, 2021
this is absolutely true for a man this old when it comes to knowledge of the NBA salary cap and all its many intricacies.... things like personnel evaluation, trade ideas, etc. etc. can be addressed and discussed competently by many, many reasonably aged people too....
I'd even throw out the possibility that it was learning the intricacies of the NBA salary cap that aged MM 400 years.
PG---Devonte'Graham
SG---Trey Murphy
SF---Brandon Ingram
PF---Zion Williamson
C----Jonas Valanciunas
Awesome starting 5
NAW needs to be in the starting rotation IMO
What I find amusing is that, in the event that a Buddy trade goes through - as mentioned previously in the thread, such a thing is still technically possible (or will become possible quite quickly) and there were at least some discussions about it - Griff will be at least mildly vindicated in one thing .
This happened at the end of last seasons:
https://www.nola.com/sports/pelicans...077ea3926.htmlQuote:
This season, no one in the NBA got beat up worse in the 3-point battleground than the Pelicans, who allowed the second-most 3s per game (14.5) while making the fourth-fewest (10.6). On the final day of the regular season, executive vice president of basketball operations David Griffin said addressing that disparity is one of his chief objectives this offseason.
“We will not be in this position again,” Griffin said.
Well, saying that we will not be a shooting deficient team again and then turning around and adding Devonte' Graham, Trey Murphy, Buddy Hield, and swapping out Adams for Jonas would be a pretty clear path towards fixing that problem.
Last season, among all players to take at least 5 catch and shoot 3s a game, Devonte' and Buddy were 5th and 15th in percentage respectively (42.3% and 39.6% each).
From players to take at least 3 pull-up 3s a game, Buddy was 8th in the NBA in percentage (38.4%).
Trey Murphy, obviously not in the NBA, shot 43.3% from 3 on 10.7 attempts per 100, and shot 40.1% on 12.3 per 100 for his overall college career.
All three players shot at least 84% from the FT line in their last season played:
92.7% his final college season for Trey
84.6% for Buddy last season (Career 86.3% FT shooter)
84.2% for Devonte' last season (career 82.2% FT shooter)
Last season we were 29th in FT% in the NBA, shooting 72.9% from the stripe as a team. Only one player who logged at least 1000 minutes for the team shot better than 80% from the FT line on the season, and that was Ingram. And even if you loosen the restriction on minutes and just look at the top 10 minutes getters for the team, you only add one more guy who shot better than 80% from the line, and that was Kira at 84.3%.
Adding Trey, Buddy, and Devonte also fixes - to a large extent - our ''being awful at FTs'' problem.
NAW needs to absolutely be given 1st crack as the starter even if they were to trade for Buddy. He is the better overall player with still more upside.
Only issue is Buddy's base contract declines each year and is incentive laden. So he'll want as many minutes as possible.
Fischer wrote an article for Bleacher Report in which he mentioned that there was some interest between the Pels and Kings in a S&T regarding Hart for Buddy. He also wrote that it is unclear if there is still any interest in such a thing, given that Hart still hasn't been signed by the Pelicans. He didn't give a huge amount of detail, and he was quite clear that it's not an active thing in process, but he's been pretty on the ball for a while now so I wouldn't be surprised if there was something at least on the table at some point. Whether it was serious or just enquiry is another matter, and whether it will actually happen is a third, entirely separate matter on top of that.
https://sports.yahoo.com/nba-rumors-...195237157.html
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think a poster here also mentioned that Val was once a pretty good three point shooter before Memphis. Due to their scheme in Memphis, he just wasn?t asked to spread the floor much. Will be interesting to see if they tap into his skills when he was with Toronto. He has the ability to shoot. Just hasn?t been using it.
I think for Jonas it depends what you mean by good three point shooter. Generally speaking, his percentages have been good but the volume has been pretty low.
He's his career so far from 3:
2012-13 until the end of 2016-17 (363 games played): 1/4 from 3
2017-18: 30/74 from 3 (40.5%) in 77 games
2018-19: 14/48 from 3 (29.2%) in 49 games
2019-20: 32/91 from 3 (35.2%) in 70 games
2020-21: 21/57 from 3 (36.8%) in 62 games
Overall career: 98/274 from 3 (35.8%) in 621 games - 0.4 attempts per game. If you ignore his first 5 seasons, where he just never attempted any at all, then you get 97/270 (35.9%) in 258 games, or about 1 per game.
He actually had very arguably his best 3pt shooting years in Memphis, compared to Toronto. The volume is just super low. Could it be a Brook Lopez thing where he's not a shooter until he goes to a team that suddenly tells him to launch and then out of nowhere he's a stretch 5? I guess it's not impossible, the percentages so far in his career are solid enough despite the low volume and he's a good FT shooter, but it's not something you want to be just assuming as a gimme. Would be an absolute career year for him as a shooter if he was even just 2 attempts a game, and the effect that has on spacing is basically zero.
Yeah i?ll admit i went to wikepedia because his name is hard to spell. Here is what i saw:
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...5783d97fa0.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Depending on late moves, I could actually see the depth chart looking more like?
PG: Graham, Lewis, Satoransky
SG: NAW, Marshall, Louzada
SF: Ingram, Murphy, Temple
PF: Williamson, Jones, Gabriel
C: Valanciunas, Hayes, Hernangomez
Not that all those guys will see minutes, but I think the two rooks are mature enough to crack the rotation, at some point. If we bring back Hart or add Hield or Markkanen obviously things would change up?
Dept Charts are more for football IMO. In a game that is positionless, especially in staggered lineups, I think its more productive to imagine rotations. So, what is the...
Starting Lineup:
Staggered Lineup #1 (5 min mark of 1st to the end of the quarter)
Staggered Lineup #2 (Beginning of the 2nd quarter lineup)
Finishing lineup
Usually teams go 9 deep. Maybe 10 at the most. And when you do that exercise, I think it is pretty to see that a "backup PF" isnt as needed as when you do the football style depth chart