I'm guessing this is a trade thread?
We get: Love and Hamilton
It only takes one GM is the saying. Thats why this is so hard for me. Personally, if I were a GM, I would consider Gordon a negative asset - that is,MichaelMcNamara 12-08-2013, 04:16 PM
Don't know if you answered this already, but at this point, what do you think we could realistically get for Gordon?Hercule 12-08-2013, 03:53 PM
All fair points. Those are my reasons, but I agree that 2-4 are debateable.
End of the day, it all comes down to the injury history for
I see where you're coming from, especially with the injury history, but other than that I think your 3 other points are pretty irrelevant. Yes Gordon'sNola3 12-08-2013, 03:42 PM
I can't remember the last time a GM signed a guy from another team to a huge deal in the summer and traded him the following year, so based on history,MichaelMcNamara 12-08-2013, 03:36 PM