In all seriousness Rivers would probably take over the point and Mclemore will probably backup Gordon for a year unless we have something in mind for him tradewise.
| . |
In all seriousness Rivers would probably take over the point and Mclemore will probably backup Gordon for a year unless we have something in mind for him tradewise.
"I don't know if people know — I dislocated my pinkie finger. And [Tyreke] told me, 'You wanna go home or you wanna be here?' I want to be here. And he said, 'All right, then go tape it up and let's play. Let's go. We not stoppin' at no stores. Straight gas. That's what we do, just keep going.'"
http://thebasketbawlblog.com/
Oladipo and McLemore.
Question I ask myself is: Who would have looked better in last night's game?
Only question that really matters to me. We say "Well I think this guy can average blah and blah...." Who cares? Only one team wins a title. How do you think each of those guys would look in a game like that? Projecting forward, which guy do you think helps his team more in a game like that, not game 47 of the regular season?
@mcnamara247
So could Danny Green until he couldn't. If you can't put the ball on the floor and create for yourself, eventually a team will shut you down in a long series.
See: Peja in Game 7, 2008 and Danny Green last two games.
Meanwhile Oladipo is more Kawhi Leonard to me. Will defend like a beast and can get you rebounds and points in unorthodox ways
Fun facts:
McLemore and Dipo had almost exactly the same combine numbers and measurements, except in two areas:
Wingspan (Oladipo +2 inches) and lane agility (Oladipo .10 faster @ 24 lbs heavier)
this is a fun topic
McLemore can get his own shot. Not only that, Dipo doesn't stretch the floor like McLemore does. In their college careers, Dipo only got 18% of his offensive production last season from his 3 point shot. Sure he had a good percentage last year but i'm willing to bet most would happily leave him some space behind the arch and sag off a bit. Meanwhile, Mclemore gets 37% of **** offensive production from the 3 point shot, 42% from 2 pointers and 20% from FTs. MUCH more balanced and much less weakness in his offensive game; to boot Mclemore almost was a member of the 50-40-90 club in college. I think if you look at it objectively, Spurs needed Mclemore and Heat would have wanted Dipo.
McLemore is much more Ray Allen than Danny Green. Either way, they both had major impacts in the finals.
And let's not understate this. This isn't shooter vs athlete. McLemore is uber athletic as well. He's far from just a jump shooter, he's a guy that plays way above the rim. Plenty talented enough to stay with anyone on defense, and out jump anyone for a rebound.
It's his quick release that gets people excited though. That's the part of his game that leaves me with no doubt he can succeed.
I think the people saying McLemore can't put the ball on the ground are kind of overstating it.
I think if nothing else we should be excited to have a shot at either one. I believe either one can improve our team. Too bad they weren't tall enough to fill our three spot
I still think baring a fruitful free agent period we will be lottery bound next year
I wonder about that. I mean, when people say "Can't create own offense." What does that even mean? Does it have to dfribble the ball up, fake one way, drive the other, spin, then layup? Or maybe jab step then put up a shot? I mean, they ran a lot of alley oop plays for McLemore. And he's VERY adept at moving off the ball. Isn't that as much creating your own offense? Going off the ball? I mean, assuming we take him instead of Burke, we'll still have a very good passer in Vasquez out there.
And McLemore is hardly a poor ball handler.
Seems like people are parroting generic player evals without really believing it themselves.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)