.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 153

Thread: Uhh, isn't Eric Gordon on the team?

  1. #26
    I can't think of one other player on any of the other 29 teams getting paid this much money at this age that wouldn't be in a similar press release.

    Not one.
    @mcnamara247

  2. #27
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    Probably nothing if not a mis-step by the PR department, or completely on purpose. Makes you wonder though, if they trade him, who do we draft?

    Dipo? Guess it depends on who you get for him, but if we don't get another 2 in the trade we've got exactly 0 SG's worth a crawfish's butt on this team.
    Wherehappens.

  3. #28
    Probably reading too much into it.

    However, after hearing about the Clippers/Celtics talk this weekend and that Paul Pierce would somehow wind up with the Clippers if that goes through, I couldn't help but think about the Gordon to Boston for Avery Bradley & Paul Pierce (and then released for his $5m buyout).

    Although I believe Boston has until June 30th for the buyout while Gordon has control over who he's traded to until some time in July.

  4. #29
    Pistol Pete Would Be Proud!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    public housing
    Posts
    3,515
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    I can't think of one other player on any of the other 29 teams getting paid this much money at this age that wouldn't be in a similar press release.

    Not one.
    Kings would put Cousins in a similar press release and he's a knucklehead.

    Nets sell Joe Johnson to the fans and he's got one of the worst contracts in the league.

    Even Phoenix tries to get Beasley over with the fans!

  5. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP View Post
    Kings would put Cousins in a similar press release and he's a knucklehead.

    Nets sell Joe Johnson to the fans and he's got one of the worst contracts in the league.

    Even Phoenix tries to get Beasley over with the fans!
    And even if they don't, none of those guys are both a max player and heading into their prime. I can't think of one guy who is this age and at this point of his career, getting paid this much that wouldn't be a part of a similar press release.

    It doesn't mean everything. But it means something.

  6. #31
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    It certainly doesn't mean nothing.

  7. #32
    I had a Twitter follower that brought up a name that was close - DeAndre Jordan, especially after the recent speculation.

    But still, he is not a max guy and not a guy that anybody has ever said was that teams best player or potential perennial All-Star.

    Just weird.

  8. #33
    All World Contributor FlyGirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Walkin to N.O.
    Posts
    18,579
    Quote Originally Posted by Smow- View Post
    This doesn't phase me at all. He is still a controversial figure with the franchise and hasn't done enough last season to be properly advertised.

    The fact that Dell has seemingly dropped off the talk of Gordon as a key piece to the franchise is what gets my inner conspirator thinking. Was he simply beating that drum because he wanted to scare off those who would offer Gordon a max while simotaneously preaching to Gordon that he believed in him while not actually feeling that way whatsoever?
    You should be phased. Be phased. Be very phased. Didn't you know Eric Gordon phases everyone around here? If his named were mentioned in said comment/article, people would still be phased that he was even mentioned. Gordon mentioned or not, people will be phased.

  9. #34
    Saint Pelican of Mile High Contributor DefensiveMind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    2,652
    It's not weird..but its not without forethought. Eric Gordon has a sketchy Hornet-Pelican history. Look at the reaction he invokes among us diehards. Is it a stretch to say that to the casual NOLA fan he is either, at best, a complete unknown or, at worst, a reminder of the CP trade and a failure? Not a great way to motivate people. Best just to not touch it..if you are designing something to generate a positive emotional response.

  10. #35
    Hall of Famer Emilio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    683
    I'm really hoping this means he's getting traded in the near future. Finger crossed.

  11. #36
    I personally believe that if you went up to Dell Demps and injected truth serum and said, "I will list the following players, tell me the odds you still think they are still on the team in three years" , he would answer:

    AD- 100%
    Rivers- 80%
    Anderson - 50%
    Smith - 50%
    Vasquez- 20% (as a bench player)
    Gordon - 0%

    Not saying this press release says we are trading him this week or even this summer, I just think they know Gordon isn't here long term. He's not a core member

  12. #37
    All World Contributor FlyGirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Walkin to N.O.
    Posts
    18,579
    My stance with the Gordon situation for some time now has been, he'll either be here, or he won't. Him staying won't phase me, him getting traded won't phase me. It is what it is. He is what he is. But, I guess while he's still listed as being on the team, (and whether he's listed in that comment or not, he IS still on the team, today) he's good for a few pages thread.

  13. #38
    A Soulful Sports Fan Contributor Eman5805's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    29,859
    Quote Originally Posted by FlyGirl View Post
    You should be phased. Be phased. Be very phased. Didn't you know Eric Gordon phases everyone around here? If his named were mentioned in said comment/article, people would still be phased that he was even mentioned. Gordon mentioned or not, people will be phased.
    Rule number one, keep your phasers on stun.


    I literally gave up on Gordon at the start of last season. After a whole offseason of waiting and talking about how he'd have a breakout year after spending the 8 game season resting and not going to the Olympics and all that. I'm like "Yeah, this'll be the year." Then the season starts and Gordon is suddenly out indefinitely.

    Never again.

  14. #39
    All World Contributor FlyGirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Walkin to N.O.
    Posts
    18,579
    Quote Originally Posted by Eman5805 View Post
    Rule number one, keep your phasers on stun.


    I literally gave up on Gordon at the start of last season. After a whole offseason of waiting and talking about how he'd have a breakout year after spending the 8 game season resting and not going to the Olympics and all that. I'm like "Yeah, this'll be the year." Then the season starts and Gordon is suddenly out indefinitely.

    Never again.
    Exactly. I'm just a fan wanting to watch my team. It's up to Demps and company to do what they see fit with Gordon. I'm pretty sure they know what to do, when to do it, and how to do it.

  15. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Eman5805 View Post
    Rule number one, keep your phasers on stun.

    "I don't know if people know — I dislocated my pinkie finger. And [Tyreke] told me, 'You wanna go home or you wanna be here?' I want to be here. And he said, 'All right, then go tape it up and let's play. Let's go. We not stoppin' at no stores. Straight gas. That's what we do, just keep going.'"

    http://thebasketbawlblog.com/

  16. #41
    If Eric Gordon was included, I think the fanbase would go ape****. Is it suspicious? Sure, but im not going to look too much into it. Maybe they are just telling the fanbase what they want to hear until Gordon either balls out or leaves by trade. If he plays well, people will forget all about this honestly.

  17. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by eballa1 View Post
    The other explanation is that the PR staff wrote this and since Gordon isn't as fan friendly as the other players mentioned, they forgot or just simply didn't include him. I work in PR and sometimes the simple answer is the right one.
    This is what I think. I dont believe hes going anywhere.

  18. #43
    Gordon for Rondo trade in the works???

  19. #44
    I think this is much ado about almost nothing
    never assume

  20. #45
    The Franchise
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kaplan, LA
    Posts
    2,094
    Please don't give him up for nothing, that's all I ask. I know he's injury prone but he still a damn good player when healthy AND motivated. We saw that after Monty fussed at him at the end of the year. He played better the rest of the way.

  21. #46
    A Soulful Sports Fan Contributor Eman5805's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    29,859
    Quote Originally Posted by jgman View Post
    I think this is much ado about almost nothing
    Oh, please. Hardly.

    I mean, William Shakespear as absolutely nothing to do with this situation.


    Unless you cast Gordon as Shylock or something.

  22. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP View Post
    If you're paying a guy $15m a year to be a part of your future, you have your marketing staff work on his image and his popularity, you don't have them gloss over the problem by ignoring it and never mentioning the guy.
    I'm sure they're changing with Benson taking over, but PR has never been a strong suit of the organization. Last year's mishandling of Gordon's injury is a prime example that they aren't being proactive when it comes to him.

  23. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by FlyGirl View Post
    You should be phased. Be phased. Be very phased. Didn't you know Eric Gordon phases everyone around here? If his named were mentioned in said comment/article, people would still be phased that he was even mentioned. Gordon mentioned or not, people will be phased.
    Everything Gordon has done was met with **** and ****. I think the argument for trading him is valid, but you have to be objective. Ive gotten over my butthurt long ago; I dont think most fans have.

  24. #49
    I think where there's smoke, there's fire. Burke not noting Gordon either isn't by itself proof of anything, but it's additional evidence when coupled with this stuff - he and Demps likely didn't spend much time, if any, discussing how he'd fit with Gordon vs. Vasquez and Davis.

  25. #50
    NO BURKE VAZQUEZ BACKOURT PLEASE BE WRONG JOHN REID

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •