You really don't get it. I'd be happy with Greivis if he was just a solid overall defender. But he isn't.
Nobody is looking for a top 5 or top 10 PG, I just want someone who won't hurt us.
 |
| . |
|
Contributor
You really don't get it. I'd be happy with Greivis if he was just a solid overall defender. But he isn't.
Nobody is looking for a top 5 or top 10 PG, I just want someone who won't hurt us.
Are you also itching to get rid of Anderson? He isn't very good on def either.
Outside of a few ill advised shots last night I don't see how GV has been hurting us.
Last edited by UNO Gracias; 03-05-2013 at 11:22 AM.
If you Jimmer it, they will come.
But he's also coming off the bench and provides far superior offense. Also, Anderson is way better than vasquez on defense. Sorry to burst your Vasquez love bubble.Originally Posted by UNO Gracias
Contributor
And his issues of defense are now being compounded with him displaying the ability to chuck at the most inopportune times.
2nd or 3rd in assists, but prone to forget about passing for moments. Funny how that works.
I agree, and I would even say that Eric Gordon's 5 assists added way more value to the team that Vasquez's 8 assits. Gordon was making some crazy good passes that Vasquez never sees or fails to execute.
Even more so is how people who want to build around a sg that can't stay healthy, and shoots worse than a shot happy pg.
InnerGI. I am glad you aren't Monty...or the janitor.
I would like to know do you think Vasquez is this team future starting PG
Cause he's Venezuelan and from Maryland.
Emeka Okafor - Joe Smith - Carmelo Anthony - Manu Ginobili - Jason Williams
Al Jefferson - James Posey - Aaron McKie - Shaun Livingston
Vasquez's offensive rating is 105 compared to his defensive rating of 111. That shows his offense doesn't compensate for his lack of defense unlike Anderson who's offensive rating is 117 compared to his defensive rating of 111.
No. If the right deal came along I would move him. I am in favor of drafting Burke. If the right deal didn't come along I would hold on to him til he was off my books next year.
What does any of that have to do with the price of tea in Chalmette?
Contributor
But he averages alot of assists and points.
Where are you pulling these numbers from?
Contributor
Basketball-Reference, I think hoopdata has them as well.
Then what are you even trying to argue if you are ready to draft Burke? If you are willing to take a rookie with no experience over Vasquez, then you are saying Vasquez needs to go... like most in this thread.
If this is true, it explains so much.....
"I'm not going to allow my putative owner to answer that question, this is an NBA related press conference. Paul Tagliabue and Roger Goodell have collectively sung their praises of Tom and if uh ESPN has a problem with that tell Mr. Skipper to call me at my office."
No, I believe that Burke will be a top 5 pg from what he is showing now. That's why I would let GV go. I think you can throw Burke in there on day 1 and he will be an impact player from day 1 (unlike Rivers who many believe is our pg of the future).
Many here want GV gone for the sake of having him gone.
I am actually Cuban and a Michigan fan, but whatever this wouldn't be the first time you are wrong about something
I want GV gone so we can have better play from the PG position. If that means Burke or trading for a PG, or signing Jennings.
I'm not in love with Assist totals. Like I said, I think Gordon's 5 assists last night were more valuable to the team.
Cool story. Lets throw rivers in there right now. He will probably perform leaps and bounds better than GV. I mean he has been doing so all season right?
I really don't think we'll be drafting Burke 4-6. If anything we get "stuck" with taking Smart if they want a PG and moving GV is in the plans.
Wherehappens.
I am fine with Smart. But if he doesn't pan out Lord help this board. The *****ing and moaning.
Contributor
This draft is SG deep
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
