.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 42

Thread: Next Year's Most Realistic Hornet's Roster

  1. #1

    Next Year's Most Realistic Hornet's Roster

    In my opinion our most realistic option will be keeping many players that some of us want to trade like GV or lopez, I would hate to trade them for unequal value and Demps is a patient and great trade worker, I could see us trading or packaging them next year for a big move but to be realistic as of now I'm thinking next year's team looks something like this:

    PG - GV/Rivers (Roberts is history)
    SG - Gordon/Mason
    SF - Will either draft shabazz or otto porter, whichever is available, and we will either keep aminu or let him go and sign budinger. So a combo of either shabazz or porter along with aminu or budinger.
    PF - Davis/Ryno/Smith
    C - Pekovic/Lopez

    Think this is a pretty decent team, as long as rivers and davis keep progressing it will be great, Also I hope GV can put up a 16-10 type season along with lopez having a 17-7 season increasing their trade value for a dynamic small forward, or packaging GV with Gordon for a dynamic and promising SG.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by HornetGuru View Post
    In my opinion our most realistic option will be keeping many players that some of us want to trade like GV or lopez, I would hate to trade them for unequal value and Demps is a patient and great trade worker, I could see us trading or packaging them next year for a big move but to be realistic as of now I'm thinking next year's team looks something like this:

    PG - GV/Rivers (Roberts is history)
    SG - Gordon/Mason
    SF - Will either draft shabazz or otto porter, whichever is available, and we will either keep aminu or let him go and sign budinger. So a combo of either shabazz or porter along with aminu or budinger.
    PF - Davis/Ryno/Smith
    C - Pekovic/Lopez

    Think this is a pretty decent team, as long as rivers and davis keep progressing it will be great, Also I hope GV can put up a 16-10 type season along with lopez having a 17-7 season increasing their trade value for a dynamic small forward, or packaging GV with Gordon for a dynamic and promising SG.
    everything looks pretty good except that one of lopez or smith will not get any minutes on that squad, so to make the roster perfect, trade lopez and whatever to try and get avery bradley instead of mason as the backup.. then id be really happy

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by bojangles837 View Post
    everything looks pretty good except that one of lopez or smith will not get any minutes on that squad, so to make the roster perfect, trade lopez and whatever to try and get avery bradley instead of mason as the backup.. then id be really happy
    Definite possibility but Bradleyy has been playing really well and I think Rondo wont be in boston next year, think it might take more than lopez to get bradley

  4. #4
    I would part with Smith before I would part with Lopez (from a production standpoint), but understanding one's contract is more favorable than the others, I can see why parting with Lopez would be easier.

    Also I don't see how Lopez gets 17-7 when he is the backup big.

    I think you can get a 2nd for Roberts. To us he has been garbage, but we are fans of the team, and are his harshest critics. He really isn't that bad considering he is a rookie. 6/2/1. Thats actually best for 7th among rookie per's in the league. The FO and Monty like what they have in him. Like I said, we are his harshest critics, and plenty of teams would be happy to have him as their backup, behind a well established pg.

    All that said, I wouldn't mind that lineup, but it doesn't "WOW" me. We would be good enough for 3rd or 4th in the West but we would never win a title.
    If you Jimmer it, they will come.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by UNO Gracias View Post
    I would part with Smith before I would part with Lopez (from a production standpoint), but understanding one's contract is more favorable than the others, I can see why parting with Lopez would be easier.

    Also I don't see how Lopez gets 17-7 when he is the backup big.

    I think you can get a 2nd for Roberts. To us he has been garbage, but we are fans of the team, and are his harshest critics. He really isn't that bad considering he is a rookie. 6/2/1. Thats actually best for 7th among rookie per's in the league. The FO and Monty like what they have in him. Like I said, we are his harshest critics, and plenty of teams would be happy to have him as their backup, behind a well established pg.

    All that said, I wouldn't mind that lineup, but it doesn't "WOW" me. We would be good enough for 3rd or 4th in the West but we would never win a title.
    he might be a rookie but he's 27 and will be 28 in december, he played pro europe ball.
    and i agree that team would be stuck in limbo, we would need to package something like gv and lopez for a difference maker

  6. #6
    Yeah Roberts is old, but heck just because you join the league late doesn't hurt you. Luis Scola, Arvydes Sabonis, so on. I think we see age and determine that to be a bad thing with NBA players, but if it was these guys would never be brought over and given the chance to last as long as many of them have.

    I don't think Roberts, GV, Lopez, Aminu, Smith, Gordon, Rivers are guys that will win you a title unless you bring in some better talent to cover up their weakness, so trading 2 or 3 of those guys at a time to net a big time player would be my hope.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by UNO Gracias View Post
    Yeah Roberts is old, but heck just because you join the league late doesn't hurt you. Luis Scola, Arvydes Sabonis, so on. I think we see age and determine that to be a bad thing with NBA players, but if it was these guys would never be brought over and given the chance to last as long as many of them have.

    I don't think Roberts, GV, Lopez, Aminu, Smith, Gordon, Rivers are guys that will win you a title unless you bring in some better talent to cover up their weakness, so trading 2 or 3 of those guys at a time to net a big time player would be my hope.
    Well i disagree about Rivers, Im still a firm believer that he will be a stud one day, if gordon could EVER become the player he could be a core of rivers, gordon, davis and ryno is disgutingly awesome, now add pekovic or shabazz or otto porter, i could see a great team.

  8. #8
    I need to see more from Rivers. Right now Roberts is outperforming him. That shouldn't be happening. One has the genes, the other has experience. Time for Rivers to really showcase his game if he wants to be taken seriously by me.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by UNO Gracias View Post
    I need to see more from Rivers. Right now Roberts is outperforming him. That shouldn't be happening. One has the genes, the other has experience. Time for Rivers to really showcase his game if he wants to be taken seriously by me.
    Well Roberts is 8 years older and I wouldn't say outperforming him, the only thing he does better is shoot, rivers is a better defender and passer, plus i'd rather rivers keep getting playing time to develop his game, he has everything needed to be a great PG in my opinion.

  10. #10
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    Burke/Vasquez
    Gordon/Rivers
    Budinger/Aminu
    Davis/Anderson
    Pek/Lopez


    Tell me why it isn't realistic.
    Wherehappens.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Haze View Post
    Burke/Vasquez
    Gordon/Rivers
    Budinger/Aminu
    Davis/Anderson
    Pek/Lopez



    Tell me why it isn't realistic.
    It's possible but I still dont see us going after a PG while having GV and Rivers but if we did I really like that lineup, burke to davis would be nice.

  12. #12
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    Quote Originally Posted by HornetGuru View Post
    It's possible but I still dont see us going after a PG while having GV and Rivers but if we did I really like that lineup, burke to davis would be nice.
    And I don't see Mason on this team next year but I could be wrong. I'd be cool with giving Rivers the full time backup. In your situation I see:

    Vasquez/Rivers
    Gordon/Mason
    Aminu/Bennett or Porter
    Davis/Anderson
    Pek/Lopez

    I think that's still one heck of a lineup already though I'd like someone more dynamic backing up Gordon, and who backs up GV when/if Gordon goes down with injury?

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Haze View Post
    And I don't see Mason on this team next year but I could be wrong. I'd be cool with giving Rivers the full time backup. In your situation I see:

    Vasquez/Rivers
    Gordon/Mason
    Aminu/Bennett or Porter
    Davis/Anderson
    Pek/Lopez

    I think that's still one heck of a lineup already though I'd like someone more dynamic backing up Gordon, and who backs up GV when/if Gordon goes down with injury?
    I'm really not trying to pull hairs but Bennett couldn't play the SF, same reason ryno cant, he is way to slow to defend the perimeter and would get blown by, he is a PF through and through, height is overrated he is 6"8 but he is still a kid and could grow though, but if u replace him with budinger and say otto porter or budinger with aminu i'd take it or even porter and budinger.

  14. #14

    Next Year's Most Realistic Hornet's Roster

    I wish someone here could put together a montage of all of our prospects.

    "I don't know if people know — I dislocated my pinkie finger. And [Tyreke] told me, 'You wanna go home or you wanna be here?' I want to be here. And he said, 'All right, then go tape it up and let's play. Let's go. We not stoppin' at no stores. Straight gas. That's what we do, just keep going.'"

    http://thebasketbawlblog.com/

  15. #15
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    Quote Originally Posted by HornetGuru View Post
    I'm really not trying to pull hairs but Bennett couldn't play the SF, same reason ryno cant, he is way to slow to defend the perimeter and would get blown by, he is a PF through and through, height is overrated he is 6"8 but he is still a kid and could grow though, but if u replace him with budinger and say otto porter or budinger with aminu i'd take it or even porter and budinger.
    I think we'll be picking 8-11 or so and if Bennett is still there, he's far and away the BPA and you have to take him. You just have to.

    He's also not through and through a PF and not nearly as slow as you're painting him to be. I also think in the league he's going to have to streamline himself a bit and be a 3. No way he's bullying anyone at 4 @ 6'7"/6'8".
    Last edited by Purple Haze; 02-14-2013 at 08:09 AM.

  16. #16
    Hall of Famer kidjock24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    888
    I don't see this team spending much on a big when we have a solid rotation of 4 (AD,Ryno,Smith,Lopez). I think they just take another step with the intention of building slow toward making a move in year 3 of Davis and Rivers development

    Vasquez/Roberts
    Gordon/ Rivers
    Porter/ Aminu (or how about Corey Brewer?)
    Davis/ Ryno
    Lopez/ Smith

  17. #17
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    Quote Originally Posted by kidjock24 View Post
    I don't see this team spending much on a big when we have a solid rotation of 4 (AD,Ryno,Smith,Lopez). I think they just take another step with the intention of building slow toward making a move in year 3 of Davis and Rivers development

    Vasquez/Roberts
    Gordon/ Rivers
    Porter/ Aminu (or how about Corey Brewer?)
    Davis/ Ryno
    Lopez/ Smith
    It's possible that they just draft and keep improving from there, but I'll be a bit disappointed. They have a ton of money and there are plenty of guys out there that would make our SF rotation better who we could get in here. Not so much with PGs. That's why I want them to go PG with our 1st. Replace Roberts AND improve the 3.

  18. #18
    The Voice of Reason Contributor RaisingTheBar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    13,223
    Quote Originally Posted by kidjock24 View Post
    I don't see this team spending much on a big when we have a solid rotation of 4 (AD,Ryno,Smith,Lopez). I think they just take another step with the intention of building slow toward making a move in year 3 of Davis and Rivers development

    Vasquez/Roberts
    Gordon/ Rivers
    Porter/ Aminu (or how about Corey Brewer?)
    Davis/ Ryno
    Lopez/ Smith
    So with all the money we have to spend you think our only off-season move will be signing whoever we draft?

  19. #19
    Hall of Famer kidjock24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    888
    I'd love if they took C.J. McC, and steal Buddinger from Minn. But isn't he restricted? Why won't Minn just match that offer? They only other SF that's unrestricted is the kid Earl Clark for the Lakers. He has looked pretty good.

  20. #20
    Hall of Famer kidjock24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    888
    I have not read anything from Dell or the way Monty is handing out minutes this year that makes me think this team will want to accelerate the time frame where they think this team can compete next year. Giving Davis baby minutes and yanking Rivers from PG to SG makes me think they are thinking year 3 is when they go after it.

  21. #21
    I dont get why u guys go crazy for Chase Budinger so much. He is ok, but not game changing.
    CAW CAW!!!

    -Founder and valuable member of the Caw Caw Boyz-

  22. #22
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    Quote Originally Posted by Silverfoxx View Post
    I dont get why u guys go crazy for Chase Budinger so much. He is ok, but not game changing.
    No one ever said he was. We said he can shoot, which Aminu cannot do from outside of 10 feet. It's a pairing, not a replacement.

  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Silverfoxx View Post
    I dont get why u guys go crazy for Chase Budinger so much. He is ok, but not game changing.
    Lol, you know why!

  24. #24
    I like Chase because he is an offensive weapon with some def. game. You can't have enough of those.

  25. #25
    Max Contract Contributor AD23forMVP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    13,348
    If we acquire Pek then both Lopez and Smith have to go, imo.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •