. |
Miller is still out there.
If you Jimmer it, they will come.
I don't see it as an effective form of behavioral therapy/treatment, but I think it very much has real world application as an analytical tool. I'm not really into post-structuralism, and in any event i don't really think there's much deviation between that and structuralism (if anything i consider it more of an extension than a diversion of structuralism)
Skylar Mayes baby!! DumbA Emmitt Williams should of came back to LSU. I don?t get these kids that have zero shot at being 1st round picks forgoing their senior year to hopefully get drafted at all or end up being signed to a G league squad
Last edited by DaPelFromHell; 11-18-2020 at 10:53 PM.
I meant what I wrote. Behaviorsim is the psychology that is being most widely used in therapeutic settings. It is real psychology and is backed by science. Psychoanalysis has been completely debunked. It has no real world use. I've been a therapist for 15 years now and have yet to come across a single sane person who supports it. It's only romanticized by self-proclaimed philosophers and is essentially their version of a "which movie character are you" quiz you'd find in Facebook. 'Literary' because these people tend to be educated and 'pop' because it's just a silly fun thing they're doing that isn't grounded in any real world application. Literary pop psychology.
Good positive energy.
But also, yo mama's fat.
Didn't see the Hornet deal. They didn't like the lower end of the draft did they.
i just read that about Hornets trade. Oh well.
Van Gundy, Griffin, and Langdon will be speaking in 35 mins on pelicans.com
I had heard they liked some international bigs. Might go after someone in international leauge. What are Pelicans getting for 42?
Griff, please have Killian Tillie on speed dial and use it as soon as the draft is over.
I mean, that statement along with your last post presents a fallacy of logic. If it is even simply applicable to literary theory then it most certainly has real world application. And I'd be wary of confidently declaring most any science as objectively "real", but that's a whole nother conversation that I don't think you'd entertain.
Yeah, it just looks like they just wanted to convert current assets into future currency and stay liquid. I get it. I guess I have a bit of an old fashioned outlook where you build your own talent in your own system, which is why, for example, you set up a G-League franchise. You can always point to a better future, but keeping your options open can become it's own kind of fetish where you're forever two years away from being two years away. That kind of "process" is a deeply unsatisfying experience for most fans, though beloved by quants and analytics mavens for whom the process is the point of being a fan. I'm willing to wait this stretch out as of course we can't know what else may be in the works before the season gets started, but my antenna is up. It's starting feel a bit like the calm assurances of brighter days ahead stretching back to when we drafted Chris Paul...
Is there any legs to trade talk for Ball after the Lewis pick?
The Pelicans have obvious holes at backup forward and center. That is why I was surprised by the trade of 42.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)