Originally Posted by
Pelicanidae
After allstar break, for the span of 11 games, he averaged pretty good numbers.
He didn't do that because he was playing SF. He did that because without Lebron, his usage rate shot through the roof. He was their number one offensive option.
Don't tell me you've never heard the phrase ''big numbers on a bad team''?
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Might Ingram improve? Sure. In fact, in some ways, very PROBABLY.
Should we be using the 11 game stretch at the end of last season as a sure-fire sign that he's gonna be a star? Of course not.