Originally Posted by
Pelicanidae
He's taking a paycut of over $100m, what? That's not just the 5th year. If he took the $203m he had on the table for 5 years, that works out at basically $40m/y. The deal he's actually taken works out at $25m/y. He's essentially taken a $15m/y less, PLUS fewer years. This is a huge paycut. He's leaving $100m on the table.
You might have a point regarding risk, degradation, injury, etc, sure. That's debatable but you could be right. But the idea that he's not leaving much on the table by sacrificing one hundred million dollars is just silly.