Possible Free Agent Targets

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HartOfaPelican

Just pay B Lopez more than what the Bucks are offering. Which we can easily do. He’s literally the only big need that we have for next season.

He doesn’t start with the Bucks. So tell him he will start with Zion and get good minutes. He’s 31 but does not have a history of injuries. Give him 2-3 years and let’s roll.

If we want to go big we go after Vucivich. Give him 5 years at Max and we have zero worries at C for the next five years... which is not a bad idea at all! He’s I. His prime at 28 years old.

---

Giving a max contract to Vucevic, at the max number of years we can offer, would be a horrible mistake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HartOfaPelican

Just pay B Lopez more than what the Bucks are offering. Which we can easily do. He’s literally the only big need that we have for next season.

He doesn’t start with the Bucks. So tell him he will start with Zion and get good minutes. He’s 31 but does not have a history of injuries. Give him 2-3 years and let’s roll.

If we want to go big we go after Vucivich. Give him 5 years at Max and we have zero worries at C for the next five years... which is not a bad idea at all! He’s I. His prime at 28 years old.

---

I think that maxing Vucevic is a bad idea at this point. Brook Lopez started 81 games for the Bucks last year averaging over 28 minutes a game. I would gladly give him $18-$20 a year for 2-3 years if that is what it took to lure him away from Milwaukee.

I still think that, best case scenario, we manage to convince Al Horford to come down for like, 2yrs $40m. That won't happen, someone will offer him twice that money over a longer time, but it would still be just almost too perfect in terms of fit and mentality.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Giving a max contract to Vucevic, at the max number of years we can offer, would be a horrible mistake.

---

Pleas elaborate how a prime age guy. Who averages 21 pts, 12 rebounds, 4 assists, and does not have injury issues is a bad idea?!? Oh and he can stretch the floor with 3pt shooting!

It’s literally exactly what we need and if we gave him 5 years he would only be 33.

If I’m gonna spend max type money on a center, give me Boogie Cousins. He has 3 point range and can bang in the paint with the best of them. I don’t think I would want him though. The only guy I would possibly give a max contract to would be DLo, but with Lonzo Ball we don’t need him. Signing a max guy would be a good move to take advantage of having Zion on a rookie deal that will run out when the max players deal will run out. I just don’t see a guy I would want to sign. It would have to be a center or point guard. They only have two centers worth that in Vucevic & Cousins. Horford & Gasol are close, but I wouldn’t want to sign either of them to the max. Then Kyrie, Kemba, and DLo are the only point guards worth the max, but two of those guys are not coming here, really maybe all 3.

So I would just go for the next tier of players at each spot. I would target Niko, Marcus Morris, or Bobby Portis. Unless they rather a stretch 5 with Hayes playing backup 4 his first year due to his size. Then you got Brook Lopez, Jonas Valanciunas, or Dewayne Dedmon that could be had for possibly a decent contract. Then hopefully get either Elfrid Payton, Terry Rozier, or maybe Emmanuel Mudiay or Quinn Cook cause of his shooting. Unless we want to bring in a vet like Rajon Rondo, Darren Collison, Patrick Beverley, or maybe Jeremy Lin. I doubt Rondo or Beverley would want to come here. The thing is though we have Jrue on the roster who can start at point guard if needed and a young guy with potential in Frank Jackson. If Ball were to get injured I would rather Jrue run the point with Moore starting unless NAW looks like the real deal right away. Plus NAW can run the point if needed as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HartOfaPelican

Pleas elaborate how a prime age guy. Who averages 21 pts, 12 rebounds, 4 assists, and does not have injury issues is a bad idea?!? Oh and he can stretch the floor with 3pt shooting!

It’s literally exactly what we need and if we gave him 5 years he would only be 33.

---

You don't give max contracts to sub-par players, with multiple years stretching into the future, unless you know they are the right fit to take you to the next level. Vucevic is not that player.

First of all, he's not going to be 28 when next season starts. He turns 29 within weeks of game 1. So after a 5 year deal, he'd be basically 34, not just turning 33.

Secondly, is he really a max level player? He's been in the league for 8 years, this is the first time he's ever had a truly impressive statistical season. You don't give max contracts to guys who have had one legitimately good year. You say he spaces the floor, and while it's true that he had a decent three point shooting year, he was actually only a 36.4% shooter from deep and that is, by far, the best he's shot in the last 7 years. He shot higher his rookie season (37.5%) but he only took 0.2 threes a game that year, so it's not actually a real sample size.

All of that is compounded by his other stats. This is by far his career high in WS/48, at .193. Is that good? Sure. Is it ''max player for 5 years after he's only done it once in a decade'' good? No, it's not. And this was, remember, as the first option on his team, with a 28% usage rating. He will not be the top option on our team, or at least he won't be if we're being smart. He'd be third, or possibly fourth depending on how Ingram plays by the end of the season. You do not pay MAX money over 5 years to a guy who is your third or fourth best player.

This is also a guy who cannot manufacture his own shot from three (100% of his threes were assisted this year), and who is defensively not very good. He was a decent rim protector, purely due to size and positioning, but he cannot defend out on the perimeter at all. That's why opponents shot 3.7% better than their averages from 3 and 4.4% better than their averages from beyond 15 feet when guarded by Vucevic. This got even worse in the playoffs where his opponents shot 9.3% better from three, and 7.3% better from beyond 15 feet. Not switchable at all: in fact, this is demonstrated by looking at his specific matchups.

He defends fairly well when guarding paint-bound bigs like Steven Adams and Clint Capela, holding them in negative player point differentials, but when he guards anyone with any kind of stretching ability (even minor stretching like Valanciunas' midrange) their point differentials soar upwards, to the point where even guys like Aaron Baynes and and Bobby Portis were roasting him.

I don't want to be paying a guy with such limited defensive and perimeter mobility upwards of $28 million dollars when he's 32, 33 years old. I just don't. If he were a deadly sniper, or a guy who had sustained this level of play for several years, maybe I'd be more easily convinced, but he's a league average shooter from three for the first time this year, and this year overall was a massive outlier for him. Maybe that's a sign of good things to come from him, but I'm not jeopardising our future by throwing out not just a big contract but a five year MAX at a guy who just had his first really productive year in a decade, and still wasn't that great doing it.

I wouldn’t pay him either. Who drafts a player at a position in the top 10, then goes out, and spends the max on a player that plays the same position? That doesn’t make any sense to me. I know its gonna take some time for Jaxson Hayes, but that wouldn’t be the greatest shot of confidence to the young man by us IMO.

He should be thinking he has a chance to be the starter in camp. If we sign a max center than he knows doesn’t have a shot at starting cause you don’t pay a guy max money to come off the bench. Now if you sign a center on a decent deal for a year or 2 he will still think he has a chance to beat him out.

The guy would have to be a vet that comes with some serious respect that can also play power forward like Al Horford. Cause then you can talk to Hayes and be like you are our future center and we see Horford as our starting center & backup 4. So you will be are first big man off the bench to play with both Zion & Horford.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaPelFromHell

I wouldn’t pay him either. Who drafts a player at a position in the top 10, then goes out, and spends the max on a player that plays the same position? That doesn’t make any sense to me. I know its gonna take some time for Jaxson Hayes, but that wouldn’t be the greatest shot of confidence to the young man by us IMO.

He should be thinking he has a chance to be the starter in camp. If we sign a max center than he knows doesn’t have a shot at starting cause you don’t pay a guy max money to come off the bench. Now if you sign a center on a decent deal for a year or 2 he will still think he has a chance to beat him out.

---

That relationship between whichever big we sign and Hayes is partially why I'm so high on Al Horford. I feel like Horford would be a fantastic guy for Hayes to learn from. Just like Hayes, Horford has (or at least, had, when he was a little younger) the foot speed and IQ to guard smaller guys on the perimeter, to switch essentially 1 through 5, and to make clever reads. He's never been a great rebounder mostly due to his size, but he's always had solid fundamentals. He sets screens fairly well, he passes well, he can play on the perimeter with ease on both ends of the court, and he's smart.

Giving him Hayes as a student for a year or two could really supercharge Hayes' potential. Get him learning from a smart, versatile veteran big who by all accounts is a good locker room presence and positive guy. Let him be the guy to install that defensive mindset, those switchable defensive concepts, and those fundamentals into Hayes.

I think we can get Dedmond for 10 million per season.

Lopez will probably command at least 18-20 million starting salary

Willie Cauley-Stein will command starting out 15-17 million

Gasol will command anywhere from $16-20 million starting salary

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

That relationship between whichever big we sign and Hayes is partially why I'm so high on Al Horford. I feel like Horford would be a fantastic guy for Hayes to learn from. Just like Hayes, Horford has (or at least, had, when he was a little younger) the foot speed and IQ to guard smaller guys on the perimeter, to switch essentially 1 through 5, and to make clever reads. He's never been a great rebounder mostly due to his size, but he's always had solid fundamentals. He sets screens fairly well, he passes well, he can play on the perimeter with ease on both ends of the court, and he's smart.

Giving him Hayes as a student for a year or two could really supercharge Hayes' potential. Get him learning from a smart, versatile veteran big who by all accounts is a good locker room presence and positive guy. Let him be the guy to install that defensive mindset, those switchable defensive concepts, and those fundamentals into Hayes.

---

Horford it seems is turning down a 30m 1 year player option so I would assume he commands somewhere in that neighborhood so that has to be considered. Little pricey and would eat all our cap space.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pels4Life

Horford it seems is turning down a 30m 1 year player option so I would assume he commands somewhere in that neighborhood so that has to be considered. Little pricey and would eat all our cap space.

---

I know, which is why I don't expect it to happen. I just think, theoretically at least, it would work very well.

A trade centered around Moore for Steven Adams would satisfy a lot of what folks seem to want to do, and Hart and NAW are already on board as replacements for Moore.

That would net out at using $15m of our cap space. And we can trade Adams as an expiring in 18 months when Hayes is ready for those minutes.

We could have an offseason where we sign center Dewayne Dedmond for 2 years - $20 million total, small forward Rudy Gay at 1 year - 10-11 million, and point guard Darren Collison at 1 year - 11-12 million.

All three guys shot over 38% from threes last season where Gay and Collison shot over 40%. Let's assume we bring back Diallo while moving Moore.

Depth Chart:

C - Dedmond, Okafor, Hayes
PF - Zion, Diallo, Wood
SF - Gay, Ingram, Keinrich
SG - Jrue, Hart, NAW
PG - Collison, Ball, Jackson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicans78

We could have an offseason where we sign center Dewayne Dedmond for 2 years - $20 million total, small forward Rudy Gay at 1 year - 10-11 million, and point guard Darren Collison at 1 year - 11-12 million.

All three guys shot over 38% from threes last season where Gay and Collison shot over 40%. Let's assume we bring back Diallo while moving Moore.

Depth Chart:

C - Dedmond, Okafor, Hayes
PF - Zion, Diallo, Wood
SF - Gay, Ingram, Keinrich
SG - Jrue, Hart, NAW
PG - Collison, Ball, Jackson

---

Ingram and Ball are going to be our starting PG/SF unless they’re traded.

I can’t see Rudy Gay or Collison signing as a backup on a team not chasing a championship

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

A trade centered around Moore for Steven Adams would satisfy a lot of what folks seem to want to do, and Hart and NAW are already on board as replacements for Moore.

That would net out at using $15m of our cap space. And we can trade Adams as an expiring in 18 months when Hayes is ready for those minutes.

---

When I heard that OKC was putting three players on the trade block, my thoughts immediately went to Adams. I assumed that the price would be too high, but it seems that they are primarily looking for salary relief, so he might not be too expensive. If they took Moore in the deal, it probably works for the Pelicans, but if they want someone with a salary of less than $2 million, I don't think it does. I believe the net for this year with Moore in the deal would be closer to $17 million, Adams would be under contract at nearly $28 million next year, then would be gone the following year ($41 million cap hold). Another problem trading for Adams is that he has a trade kicker of nearly $2 million, so the net is close to $20 million for this year's cap, if I am figuring correctly.

I think Adams makes a lot of sense in the abstract, but I don't know that it works given that a trade for him could prevent other moves Griffin would want to make. I like the timeline though of having a legit starting center for the next two years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

Ingram and Ball are going to be our starting PG/SF unless they’re traded.

I can’t see Rudy Gay or Collison signing as a backup on a team not chasing a championship

---

Yeah I could see that but if we signed Collison and Gay to those salaries, they would start. Plus Ball could run the second unit with Ingram, Hart, and Hayes. Also we could trade Gay and Collison at the deadline if we’re not competing for a playoff spot.

But I’m fine with Ingram and Ball starting and signing veteran backups for them who can shoot. But Jrue and Zion would benefit from shooters around them. Imagine having shooters like Dedmond, Gay, and Collison next to Jrue and Zion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

Ingram and Ball are going to be our starting PG/SF unless they’re traded.

I can’t see Rudy Gay or Collison signing as a backup on a team not chasing a championship

---

Right. I can't remember where I read it, but I am sure I saw something about Gay intending to resign with the Spurs for around $10 million. If the Pelicans wanted him, I would imagine it would take at least $13-14 million for a couple of years to entice him to leave San Antonio.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zombiewoof

When I heard that OKC was putting three players on the trade block, my thoughts immediately went to Adams. I assumed that the price would be too high, but it seems that they are primarily looking for salary relief, so he might not be too expensive. If they took Moore in the deal, it probably works for the Pelicans, but if they want someone with a salary of less than $2 million, I don't think it does. I believe the net for this year with Moore in the deal would be closer to $17 million, Adams would be under contract at nearly $28 million next year, then would be gone the following year ($41 million cap hold). Another problem trading for Adams is that he has a trade kicker of nearly $2 million, so the net is close to $20 million for this year's cap, if I am figuring correctly.

I think Adams makes a lot of sense in the abstract, but I don't know that it works given that a trade for him could prevent other moves Griffin would want to make. I like the timeline though of having a legit starting center for the next two years.

---

But couldn't this be THE move that Griffin wants to make? We'd still have cap space to sign backups at SF/PG, which I think would be the remaining holes on the team. I'd happily bring back Darius, sign DeMarre Carroll , and add whoever the BPA is at PG to compete with Frank Jackson for the backup role.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

But couldn't this be THE move that Griffin wants to make? We'd still have cap space to sign backups at SF/PG, which I think would be the remaining holes on the team. I'd happily bring back Darius, sign DeMarre Carroll , and add whoever the BPA is at PG to compete with Frank Jackson for the backup role.

---

Sure, it could be. It makes sense to me to have someone like Adams in that role, which gives Hayes more time to develop. Hayes may end up being more power forward than center anyway, though that's unlikely. Having Adams would certainly allow Zion and Hayes more time to define who they are in the NBA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

That relationship between whichever big we sign and Hayes is partially why I'm so high on Al Horford. I feel like Horford would be a fantastic guy for Hayes to learn from. Just like Hayes, Horford has (or at least, had, when he was a little younger) the foot speed and IQ to guard smaller guys on the perimeter, to switch essentially 1 through 5, and to make clever reads. He's never been a great rebounder mostly due to his size, but he's always had solid fundamentals. He sets screens fairly well, he passes well, he can play on the perimeter with ease on both ends of the court, and he's smart.

Giving him Hayes as a student for a year or two could really supercharge Hayes' potential. Get him learning from a smart, versatile veteran big who by all accounts is a good locker room presence and positive guy. Let him be the guy to install that defensive mindset, those switchable defensive concepts, and those fundamentals into Hayes.

---

I ended up adding that the max guy would have to be a player that comes with massive respect around the league and Horford would likely be the only guy in that top tier of centers. I like him cause he could backup Zion as well when Hayes comes into the game. Hayes could easily play with both Zion & Horford. The only problem is Horford is gonna want a max deal and may want to join a team with a better chance at the title.

Not only can Hayes learn from Horford, but also Zion. He would be a perfect fit for us, in that he’s a vet with a ton of playoff experience that won two titles in college. I know it was college, but he knows what it takes and how it feels to win. I would bet that Grif will at least give his camp a call to get a feel for what they want. I doubt we can get him here, but possibly so.

C: Horford, Hayes, Okafor
PF: Zion, Wood, Williams
SF: Ingram, Hart, Miller, Bertans
SG: Jrue, NAW, Moore
PG: Ball, Jackson,

Then I would just sign minimum guys at point guard & maybe bring back Darius Miller for the minimum as well. I think Jrue, Jackson, & NAW could probably get it done as our backup lead guards though. I would have Hayes as our first big off the bench and Okafor as our 4th. I think those 2 could play together as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaPelFromHell

I ended up adding that the max guy would have to be a player that comes with massive respect around the league and Horford would likely be the only guy in that top tier of centers. I like him cause he could backup Zion as well when Hayes comes into the game. Hayes could easily play with both Zion & Horford. The only problem is Horford is gonna want a max deal and may want to join a team with a better chance at the title.

Not only can Hayes learn from Horford, but also Zion. He would be a perfect fit for us, in that he’s a vet with a ton of playoff experience that won two titles in college. I know it was college, but he knows what it takes and how it feels to win. I would bet that Grif will at least give his camp a call to get a feel for what they want. I doubt we can get him here, but possibly so.

---

I don't think that Hayes will end up getting many minutes, to be honest, at least not to start the season. So you shouldn't be signing players with him and rotations in mind. It's all about the locker-room presence, and that training partner who can show him the details and the fundamentals in a practical, one on one situation.

I also doubt that we could get him here. It's definitely worth the call, but I just feel (like you do) that he's probably going to end up going somewhere with a hope at a title, for very possibly more money than we would want to give.

I’m betting we are getting an all star in FA or via trade. Probably trading for an all star.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We may not need a backup point guard with the plethora of guards we have on the roster.

Point guards: Lonzo Ball, Frank Jackson
Combo guards: Jrue Holiday, NAW
Shooting guards: Josh Hart, Etwaun Moore

We have 6 guards that should make the roster if we keep Moore. I think Hart & Moore will likely play as a 3rd guard when Ingram is not in the game. Jrue Holiday, Frank Jackson, & NAW can be our backup point guards when Ball is not in the game IMO.

So we really just need another big, so we could really go after a max type guy if we wanted. Al Horford may be the best fit out of Vucevic, Cousins, Gasol, Tobias, Porzingis, Millsap, or Randle. Those 8 are probably the best 8 bigs that will be on the market. I don’t want Vucevic. Tobias, Millsap, & Randle don’t fit with what we need IMO. No way Dallas doesn’t resign Porzingis after trading that haul to the Knicks. Cousins & Gasol might be good fits and would fit that “respect around the league” type veteran to not effect Hayes confidence like Vucevic would IMO.

Or we go after Niko, Marcus Morris, Brook Lopez, Jonas V, Dedmon, or Bobby Portis. I think Jonas & Portis may resign with the Griz & Wiz though. So that would leave Niko, Brook Lopez, Marcus Morris, & Dedmon as possible 2nd tier guys to sign. I would take any one of those 4.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicans78

I think we can get Dedmond for 10 million per season.

Lopez will probably command at least 18-20 million starting salary

Willie Cauley-Stein will command starting out 15-17 million

Gasol will command anywhere from $16-20 million starting salary

---

If all of these players would agree to a 2-year contract in the salary range you mentioned, my preference would be...

1. Marc Gasol
2. Brook Lopez
3. Dewayne Dedman

Not interested in Cauley-Stein at all.

I wonder what we could get from Miami for taking Whiteside on?

Dragic, Whiteside, and a top 10 protected 2022 1st for E'Twaun Moore and Frank Jackson would work. Sign DeMarre Carroll.

We really should do whatever we can to get Malcom Brogdon. He should get paid. I like Lonzo but he isn’t nearly as good as Brogdon. Maybe Lonzo will develop into a better player on offense but we need a starting pg that can play defense, shoot, and facilitate. I’d offer him more than the Bucks can pay him. Is that possible? We should move Moore and maybe other pieces to make space for Brogdon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

I wonder what we could get from Miami for taking Whiteside on?

Dragic, Whiteside, and a top 10 protected 2022 1st for E'Twaun Moore and Frank Jackson would work. Sign DeMarre Carroll.

---

Whiteside is a basketcase. Not interested.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pelicanchamp

We really should do whatever we can to get Malcom Brogdon. He should get paid. I like Lonzo but he isn’t nearly as good as Brogdon. Maybe Lonzo will develop into a better player on offense but we need a starting pg that can play defense, shoot, and facilitate. I’d offer him more than the Bucks can pay him. Is that possible? We should move Moore and maybe other pieces to make space for Brogdon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Lonzo is already a better defender and passer than Brogdon is. There's no doubt that Brogdon is a superior shooter, by a long shot, but saying ''maybe Lonzo will develop [...] but we need a starting PG that can play defense, shoot, and facilitate'' is kind of weird because Lonzo is better at two of those things than Brogdon is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Whiteside is a basketcase. Not interested.

---

A basketcase in a contract year can be managed more so than Miami has managed to with him knowing his future money is guaranteed. Gentry has dealt with Rondo and Boogie. He might be capable of dealing with Whiteside.

If Miami is willing to attach the right asset(s), I would hope Griff and crew wouldn't completely dismiss it. Worst case scenario is you move him at the deadline as a massive expiring!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Lonzo is already a better defender and passer than Brogdon is. There's no doubt that Brogdon is a superior shooter, by a long shot, but saying ''maybe Lonzo will develop [...] but we need a starting PG that can play defense, shoot, and facilitate'' is kind of weird because Lonzo is better at two of those things than Brogdon is.

---

Lonzo is an awesome defender but why is Brogdon’s defensive rating 101 vs Lonzo’s which is 105? If you look at points allowed per 100 possessions Brogdon does significantly better on defense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pelicanchamp

Lonzo is an awesome defender but why is Brogdon’s defensive rating 101 vs Lonzo’s which is 105? If you look at points allowed per 100 possessions Brogdon does significantly better on defense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Wow, using defensive rating on it's own?

If you compare Lonzo and Brogdon both using their statistics from last year, Lonzo averaged more steals, more blocks, more defensive rebounds (yes, rebounds are part of defense), a higher steal percentage, a higher block percentage, and had the better defensive box plus/minus.

If you look at their individual defensive results, you find that Lonzo held his opponents to shooting 1.4% worse than their averages overall, including 2.2% worse from outside of 15 feet. Brogdon, by comparison, only held his opponents to 0.1% worse than their averages overall. Brogdon was the superior interior defender (allowing opponents to shoot only 0.2% better than their averages inside of six feet, compared to Lonzo's 4.4% inside of six feet) but on the perimeter, Lonzo's oFG% is clearly better, even if only a little.

They're both very good defenders, but honestly Lonzo takes the cake in that category.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Wow, using defensive rating on it's own?

If you compare Lonzo and Brogdon both using their statistics from last year, Lonzo averaged more steals, more blocks, more defensive rebounds (yes, rebounds are part of defense), a higher steal percentage, a higher block percentage, and had the better defensive box plus/minus.

If you look at their individual defensive results, you find that Lonzo held his opponents to shooting 1.4% worse than their averages overall, including 2.2% worse from outside of 15 feet. Brogdon, by comparison, only held his opponents to 0.1% worse than their averages overall. Brogdon was the superior interior defender (allowing opponents to shoot only 0.2% better than their averages inside of six feet, compared to Lonzo's 4.4% inside of six feet) but on the perimeter, Lonzo's oFG% is clearly better, even if only a little.

They're both very good defenders, but honestly Lonzo takes the cake in that category.

---

First I love Brogdon, but I never understood the he’s a very good defender line. He doesn’t hurt you there, but he’s not some stopper either. He a high iq team defender and is maybe a shade above league average on the ball. It might just be coming out of the Virginia system and the rep they have. I felt the same way about Hunter in the draft, people were making him out like he was some sort of stopper, he’s not. So much of that is just how Virginia plays defense, and the fact most college teams can break it because they don’t have enough shooting or playmaking.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

I don't think that Hayes will end up getting many minutes, to be honest, at least not to start the season. So you shouldn't be signing players with him and rotations in mind. It's all about the locker-room presence, and that training partner who can show him the details and the fundamentals in a practical, one on one situation.

I also doubt that we could get him here. It's definitely worth the call, but I just feel (like you do) that he's probably going to end up going somewhere with a hope at a title, for very possibly more money than we would want to give.

---

I think Hayes is gonna play right away. I just don’t know the minutes he will get. Unless we do sign a big time free agent and they are serious about a possible deep playoff run right away with Golden State wounded. The west is wide open like it hasn’t been in years, so next year might be the only real shot another team has for a while. He’s gonna have to get some experience and I think they want both him & Zion to grow together.

It depends on what teams will want to sign Horford. If a title team doesn’t want to spend the money he wants, he could possibly come here for more money. Not sure if I want to pay him a ton though either. Not too many teams have a 1-4 with the potential we have on the roster. The only playoff caliber teams that could use a center look to be possibly Portland, the Clippers, and maybe rejoining Boston. Unless he wants to go to a Knicks team if they sign two other big time free agents. Golden State, Houston, Indiana, the Lakers, OKC, Orlando, Brooklyn, Denver, Philly, & Utah is not likely to sign him cause they either have a center or can’t afford him. Maybe San Antonio, Toronto, or Milwaukee could but not sure about their cap situations. They really only have 6 teams that could maybe sign him that look to be playoff caliber teams. Maybe we will look better than some of those teams with the additions we made and him being one of the leaders with Jrue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaPelFromHell

I think Hayes is gonna play right away. I just don’t know the minutes he will get. Unless we do sign a big time free agent and they are serious about a possible deep playoff run right away with Golden State wounded. The west is wide open like it hasn’t been in years, so next year might be the only real shot another team has for a while. He’s gonna have to get some experience and I think they want both him & Zion to grow together.

It depends on what teams will want to sign Horford. If a title team doesn’t want to spend the money he wants, he could possibly come here for more money. Not sure if I want to pay him a ton though either. Not too many teams have a 1-4 with the potential we have on the roster. The only playoff caliber teams that could use a center look to be possibly Portland, the Clippers, and maybe rejoining Boston. Unless he wants to go to a Knicks team if they sign two other big time free agents. Golden State, Houston, Indiana, the Lakers, OKC, Orlando, Brooklyn, Denver, Philly, & Utah is not likely to sign him cause they either have a center or can’t afford him. Maybe San Antonio, Toronto, or Milwaukee could but not sure about their cap situations. They really only have 6 teams that could maybe sign him that look to be playoff caliber teams. Maybe we will look better than some of those teams with the additions we made and him being one of the leaders with Jrue.

---

You forgot to mention the team rumored to have serious interest in him, the Dallas Mavericks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

A basketcase in a contract year can be managed more so than Miami has managed to with him knowing his future money is guaranteed. Gentry has dealt with Rondo and Boogie. He might be capable of dealing with Whiteside.

If Miami is willing to attach the right asset(s), I would hope Griff and crew wouldn't completely dismiss it. Worst case scenario is you move him at the deadline as a massive expiring!

---

It was a much different situation with Rondo and Boogie. We now have a very young locker room that Griffin is looking for the right culture for. Whiteside is not someone you want in your locker room with young guys. The Adams proposal makes much more sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN

It was a much different situation with Rondo and Boogie. We now have a very young locker room that Griffin is looking for the right culture for. Whiteside is not someone you want in your locker room with young guys. The Adams proposal makes much more sense.

---

I ageee with whiteside don’t want him no where around this team


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darkhorse985

You forgot to mention the team rumored to have serious interest in him, the Dallas Mavericks.

---

Yes but are they playoff contenders much less title contenders?

Plus they are paying Tim Hardaway Jr, Dwight Powell, & Courtney Lee a combined ~$41 million(whoops I was off 10 Mil lol) next year. They won’t be able to sign Porzingis & Horford the max or even close to it. I heard they wanted to move Courtney Lee and his $12.8 million he’s due this year, but it didn’t happen during the draft.

This is why I didn’t include them cause I think for sure they gonna resign Porzingis.

Dwayne Dedmon should be an obvious target.

I know this doesn’t deal with the team, but kind of does since we are really invested in the Lakers success or failure, preferably failure!!

I actually hope the Lakers make room for Kemba Walker. They would be better off signing a few good players over one max guy IMO. If they sign Kemba Walker they will only be able to afford minimum players to fill out the rest of their roster.

C: AD
PF: Kuzma
SF: LeBron
SG: Horton-Tucker (just a place holder, but maybe not lol)
PG: Kemba

Then if AD misses his usual amount of games they will be in a world of hurt during that/those stretch/es. But I’m sure some decent older vets will take the minimum just to play with LeBron, AD, & Kemba and chase a ring. I doubt any younger guys would except the guys that would only make the minimum anyway. I don’t think you can win a title with 70+% of your roster filled with minimum players. You need to have at least a couple legit players coming off your bench. I don’t think you can win with a bunch of older ring chasing players filling out your roster too. A mix of really older vets with younger fringe NBA players is not a great recipe for success IMO.

The more I think about it, the more bogdonovic is the perfect fit, he can play both small forward and power forward and is an assassin from 3, you could start him at the 3 and let Ingram play the 6th man role, or run him at the 4 and Zion at the 5 for small ball, and to close out games. Fact of the matter is, we need a big who can stretch the floor and while he isn’t a typical power forward, he has played Jt before and can defend the position just fine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaPelFromHell

I know this doesn’t deal with the team, but kind of does since we are really invested in the Lakers success or failure, preferably failure!!

I actually hope the Lakers make room for Kemba Walker. They would be better off signing a few good players over one max guy IMO. If they sign Kemba Walker they will only be able to afford minimum players to fill out the rest of their roster.

C: AD
PF: Kuzma
SF: LeBron
SG: Horton-Tucker (just a place holder, but maybe not lol)
PG: Kemba

Then if AD misses his usual amount of games they will be in a world of hurt during that/those stretch/es. But I’m sure some decent vets will take the minimum just to play with LeBron, AD, & Kemba and chase a ring. I doubt any younger guys would except the guys that would only make the minimum anyway. I don’t think you can win a title with 70+% of your roster filled with minimum players. You need to have at least a couple legit players coming off your bench. I don’t think you can win with a bunch of older ring chasing players filling out your roster too. A mix of really older vets with younger fringe NBA players is not a great recipe for success IMO.

---

Since it looks like it will be difficult for the Lakers to clear the required room for a 7+ year max player, the rumor is that they are considering pursuing a reunion with DeAngelo Russell as his max number is attainable if AD waves his trade kicker.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HornetGuru

The more I think about it, the more bogdonovic is the perfect fit, he can play both small forward and power forward and is an assassin from 3, you could start him at the 3 and let Ingram play the 6th man role, or run him at the 4 and Zion at the 5 for small ball, and to close out games. Fact of the matter is, we need a big who can stretch the floor and while he isn’t a typical power forward, he has played Jt before and can defend the position just fine.

---

I also think he would be a perfect fit. He was asked to do to much for Indy in the playoffs but like I said he would fit nicely with his shooting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HornetGuru

The more I think about it, the more bogdonovic is the perfect fit, he can play both small forward and power forward and is an assassin from 3, you could start him at the 3 and let Ingram play the 6th man role, or run him at the 4 and Zion at the 5 for small ball, and to close out games. Fact of the matter is, we need a big who can stretch the floor and while he isn’t a typical power forward, he has played Jt before and can defend the position just fine.

---

Is he restricted?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nola3

Is he restricted?

---

Unrestricted & made $10.5m last season. I been saying I want him too. How much you think he'll be asking for?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hornetzplaya

Unrestricted & made $10.5m last season. I been saying I want him too. How much you think he'll be asking for?

---

I really like your idea then. I think he'd be really effective in most of our lineups. But shooting has been at a premium for obvious reasons, and shooting and size make GM's lose their minds (see: Ryan Anderson). Wouldn't shock me if he something like $60 mil over 3 years especially with all the cap room out there. If we're going to overpay, he wouldn't be a bad option to overpay for, but his timeline doesn't line up all that great with ours and Griff might not want to blow most of the cap space he's created this early.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nola3

I really like your idea then. I think he'd be really effective in most of our lineups. But shooting has been at a premium for obvious reasons, and shooting and size make GM's lose their minds (see: Ryan Anderson). Wouldn't shock me if he something like $60 mil over 3 years especially with all the cap room out there. If we're going to overpay, he wouldn't be a bad option to overpay for, but his timeline doesn't line up all that great with ours and Griff might not want to blow most of the cap space he's created this early.

---

I agree with that. Ideally id like Bogdonovic to take about $16m for 2 or 3 years.

Then sign a stretch 4 like Niko for about $15m and run it with Okafor Starting with Hayes and Wood off of the bench

OR

We sign a 5 like Dwayne Dedmon for about $10-12m for 2 years then keep Okafor, and Hayes.

Either scenario is good to me WITH Bogdonovic.

HOWEVER judging by what ive seen by Griff so far, we'll look for much cheaper options especially at the three. I think we'll look to sign more depth and shooters more than anything. Players like Justin Holiday(SF), Thabo Sefelosha(SF), Demarre Carroll(SF), Etc. Then a cheaper big man that can spread the floor like a Niko, Lopez, Dedmon, etc. Which I wouldnt mind too much either as our players devolop

If griff was smart he would over pay someone he wants but on a 2 year deal only

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HornetGuru

If griff was smart he would over pay someone he wants but on a 2 year deal only

---

Why would overpaying be smart?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pels4Life

Why would overpaying be smart?

---

Because our cap space isn't that important right now. We aren't going to be an attractive destination for the real difference makers like Kawhi Leonard, at least not at this point, and there's no use saving it for next season because the 2020 FA class is garbage. May as well just secure someone decent on a short team deal who fits but leaves our salary free in the long term.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN

It was a much different situation with Rondo and Boogie. We now have a very young locker room that Griffin is looking for the right culture for. Whiteside is not someone you want in your locker room with young guys. The Adams proposal makes much more sense.

---

That's my thought. I'm not sure I'm a huge fan of either, just because the contracts on both guys are legitimately absurd (and the Adams one lasts even longer) but at least Adams is (by all reports I've heard) a legitimately decent guy, easy to get along with, good locker room presence. At the same time, Adams is not a selfish player, does the gritty work (boxes out and sets screens like a madman), and is willing to sacrifice his numbers for others. Westbrook's artificially inflated rebounds stats will tell you that much.