AD trade scenarios...

Printable View

Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-11-2019, 05:27 PM
JJackisangry

Quote:

Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN

Unless a player has a no trade clause or has the ability (due to signing as a restricted free agent) to veto a trade by the rules, a player cannot simply veto a trade. The commissioner did not veto the CP3 trade, the defacto owner did that.

Exactly. See Carmelo and the infamous trade kicker
06-11-2019, 05:31 PM
13 - 3

It’s a year old article but you get the idea

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2018/07/...in-201819.html
06-11-2019, 05:33 PM
13 - 3

Another interesting article.

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2018/2...ed-kobe-bryant
06-11-2019, 05:34 PM
JJackisangry

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13 - 3

It’s a year old article but you get the idea

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2018/07/...in-201819.html

Anthony is on a five year deal with no trade kicker so we good
06-11-2019, 05:46 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13 - 3

It’s a year old article but you get the idea

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2018/07/...in-201819.html

This article has NOTHING to do with Anthony Davis or anything to do with his deal.

It explicitly lays out the criteria under which a player has trade protection. AD does not meet any of those criteria.

Why would you even post this?
06-11-2019, 05:54 PM
Pelicanidae

Pels fans: “trade AD”

Griff: “I hired Swin Cash”

Pels fans: “That’s great! Trade AD now”

Griff: “I just ordered a bunch of flex tape off of amazon”

Pels fans: “ummmm”

Griff: “I’m learning origami!”
— Tyler (@TMDillo5) June 11, 2019
06-11-2019, 06:12 PM
donato

Lakers: AD

Suns: Lonzo, Kuzma

Wizards: 4th pick, 6th pick, Hart, Wagner

Pels: Beal, Ingram, Lakers 2020, 2022 1st rounders unprotected

Who says no?
06-11-2019, 06:17 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by donato

Lakers: AD

Suns: Lonzo, Kuzma

Wizards: 4th pick, 6th pick, Hart, Wagner

Pels: Beal, Ingram, Lakers 2020, 2022 1st rounders unprotected

Who says no?

Me. Don't want any parts of Ingram. Send him to the Wizards, I'll take Hart and the #6 instead.

Edit: still don't really like that deal either, but the Lakers assets suck. Their young guys are either incapable of playing half of the game (Lonzo) or are one bad air-line flight away from retirement (Ingram), so I don't want any of them.
06-11-2019, 06:17 PM
13 - 3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

This article has NOTHING to do with Anthony Davis or anything to do with his deal.

It explicitly lays out the criteria under which a player has trade protection. AD does not meet any of those criteria.

Why would you even post this?

It’s just FYI. Why you so mad? Calm down. I thought it was interesting. I’m learning how this veto stuff works too.
06-11-2019, 06:23 PM
donato

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Me. Don't want any parts of Ingram. Send him to the Wizards, I'll take Hart and the #6 instead.

Edit: still don't really like that deal either, but the Lakers assets suck. Their young guys are either incapable of playing half of the game (Lonzo) or are one bad air-line flight away from retirement (Ingram), so I don't want any of them.

Ok. Then suppose the Wizards take Ingram and we get the 6th pick. Would you do it then?

Lakers: AD

Suns: Lonzo, Kuzma

Wizards: 4th pick, Ingram, Hart, Wagner

Pels: Beal, 6th pick overall, Lakers 2020, 2022 1st rounders unprotected

Edit, I didn't fully read your post.
06-11-2019, 06:25 PM
da ThRONe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Pels fans: “trade AD”

Griff: “I hired Swin Cash”

Pels fans: “That’s great! Trade AD now”

Griff: “I just ordered a bunch of flex tape off of amazon”

Pels fans: “ummmm”

Griff: “I’m learning origami!”
— Tyler (@TMDillo5) June 11, 2019

We shouldn't trade him until draft night. So we can get a teams pick this year and next. Knicks pick looking even better now that KD is hurt if they do go ahead and sign him anyways.
06-11-2019, 06:27 PM
donato

Starting to get a little antsy with this chatter about how none of the other stars got value. Clippers, Celtics, Knicks wouldn't be interested now, etc. The fact of course remains we don't know what's going to happen. :afreak:
06-11-2019, 06:29 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by da ThRONe

We shouldn't trade him until draft night. So we can get a teams pick this year and next. Knicks pick looking even better now that KD is hurt if they do go ahead and sign him anyways.

I honestly think the KD injury makes the Knicks more desperate to get AD, not less. I get that their plan was to combine AD and KD together for an instant contender, and a lot of people feel like KD getting hurt completely scuppers that plan, so I understand why some people would think otherwise.

But for me, losing out on KD now makes AD a must-get for them. They have no backup plan. Kyrie's shown strong signs of heading to Brooklyn instead of NY (still no guarantee), and since KD is injured, AD is their last real shot at a legitimate superstar. They miss out on him, they probably have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for someone like Vucevic, who is good but isn't going to ignite playoff hopes for the franchise. Next free agency doesn't really have as many chances at superstars either, it's a lot drier. For NYC, it's this year, or accept another multiple dead-years. AD is their last hope, their last piece that could lure other stars in (Kyrie, Kemba, Butler), and their last chance to sell the fanbase on moving forward.

Add to that the fact that apparently AD's list is now just LA and NY, and NY have to at least think he'd be open to resigning there, since he keeps naming them.
06-11-2019, 06:29 PM
da ThRONe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythrol

The argument people made at the deadline wasnt just about some mythical Boston offer. That's a gross simplification and misinterpretation of what we were saying.

The MAIN arguement for not trading AD to ANY team at the deadline was, it made our pick and their picks worse, it reduced our chances of getting Zion and didn't allow us the ability to negotiate with whichever team did get Zion.

The second point was that it allowed for all teams to be involved in negotiations with us, not 10 days out and just the Lakers and NY but the entire league had time to make offers.

Third point was these two factors outweighed the risks of keeping AD.

The fact we won the lottery means we 1000% made the RIGHT decision in not trading AD. Anyone trying to go back and repaint history needs to stop. You were wrong. Period.

Knicks were going to be trash with or without Davis and that's where we should have traded him.
06-11-2019, 06:36 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by da ThRONe

Knicks were going to be trash with or without Davis and that's where we should have traded him.

Trade AD in February, you don't get Zion.
06-11-2019, 06:40 PM
NMThreeMVP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Yep.

And AD is better than Boogie, or Paul George.

So basically Buddy and Oladipo were better than people thought they would be and so now we’re saying those were good deals? But you’re completely discounting that 3 dudes under 23 who have been playing for a crappy franchise could get better if they’re traded here, along with the #4 pick, and future draft picks?

Y’all are funny.
06-11-2019, 06:41 PM
da ThRONe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

I honestly think the KD injury makes the Knicks more desperate to get AD, not less. I get that their plan was to combine AD and KD together for an instant contender, and a lot of people feel like KD getting hurt completely scuppers that plan, so I understand why some people would think otherwise.

But for me, losing out on KD now makes AD a must-get for them. They have no backup plan. Kyrie's shown strong signs of heading to Brooklyn instead of NY (still no guarantee), and since KD is injured, AD is their last real shot at a legitimate superstar. They miss out on him, they probably have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for someone like Vucevic, who is good but isn't going to ignite playoff hopes for the franchise. Next free agency doesn't really have as many chances at superstars either, it's a lot drier. For NYC, it's this year, or accept another multiple dead-years. AD is their last hope, their last piece that could lure other stars in (Kyrie, Kemba, Butler), and their last chance to sell the fanbase on moving forward.

Add to that the fact that apparently AD's list is now just LA and NY, and NY have to at least think he'd be open to resigning there, since he keeps naming them.

I agree. The Knicks has been selling the fanbase a star. I think they knew KD was coming. So now they have to come through. Trading for Davis may put them ahead of Brooklyn for Irving services. And KD is still on the table. They could still go into next season with Irving, Davis, and Durant under contract.
06-11-2019, 06:42 PM
da ThRONe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Trade AD in February, you don't get Zion.

We don't know that. That perspective has more potholes than Avengers Endgame.
06-11-2019, 06:42 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

So basically Buddy and Oladipo were better than people thought they would be and so now we’re saying those were good deals? But you’re completely discounting that 3 dudes under 23 who have been playing for a crappy franchise could get better if they’re traded here, along with the #4 pick, and future draft picks?

Y’all are funny.

Where did I say that they were considered good deals at the time? Cause you're assuming I said that as the basis of your argument.

Take your time and get back to me when you find where I said that. Good luck.
06-11-2019, 06:45 PM
NMThreeMVP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Trade AD in February, you don't get Zion.

Getting Zion was luck, not strategy.

Your statement is like telling someone who didn’t graduate high school, but somehow won the powerball, that dropping out was the right thing to do. How far back do you take this crazy town approach to events?
06-11-2019, 06:45 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by da ThRONe

We don't know that. That perspective has more potholes than Avengers Endgame.

Fine, let me rephrase it with all caveats in place.

''The way things went, we got extremely lucky, and ended up with Zion. Any other combination of the ping-pong balls falling in another way would have NOT got us Zion. The odds of us getting Zion in the lottery were extremely small. If we had traded AD in February, there is pretty much no question that us and the other team would have had different records. NY would have still sucked but they wouldn't have been 17 wins. We would have still sucked, but we wouldn't have had the same record we ended up with. Given the extreme unlikelihood of us getting the pick we have under even the circumstances we got it, it seems silly to wish we had done something differently which would have altered our chances, even by only one or two spots, and prevented us from acquiring the single best NBA prospect out of college in over a decade.''

How's that? Pedantic enough?
06-11-2019, 06:46 PM
NMThreeMVP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Where did I say that they were considered good deals at the time? Cause you're assuming I said that as the basis of your argument.

Take your time and get back to me when you find where I said that. Good luck.

Are you not, NOW, saying those were good deals?? The fact that you DID NOT say it then, is exactly my point!
06-11-2019, 06:47 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

Getting Zion was luck, not strategy.

Your statement is like telling someone who didn’t graduate high school, but somehow won the powerball, that dropping out was the right thing to do. How far back do you take this crazy town approach to events?

:rolleyes:

Have you ever heard of the concept of arguing in good faith? I have to ask, since you seem extremely determined to avoid doing it at all costs.
06-11-2019, 06:47 PM
PELICANSFAN

Quote:

Originally Posted by da ThRONe

We don't know that. That perspective has more potholes than Avengers Endgame.

So you think that we would win exactly the same number of games?
06-11-2019, 06:51 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

Are you not, NOW, saying those were good deals?? The fact that you DID NOT say it then, is exactly my point!

I'm saying those deals worked out pretty well in the long run.

I've never ''discounted'' the idea that Ball or Ingram could get better. We have had this argument dozens of times on this board. Every single time, whether it's with you, or 13-3, or GA25, or whichever bad-faith arguer decides not to bother actually reading what I've written before flipping their lids, I have to explain YET AGAIN that I totally understand that Ingram, or Ball, or Kuzma, or Josh Hart, or Moe flippin' Wagner, COULD end up improving in the future. In fact, MULTIPLE TIMES I have clarified that I expect certain improvements from certain players (I EXPECT Ingram to improve as a rebounder, for example).

I've also said that IF we were to end up with those players I would desperately hope that they prove me wrong and play well, because I want this team to be good, and I would be HAPPY to be wrong in those circumstances.

Please, please, I am begging you, argue with things I've actually said, or for approaches I've actually taken, rather than just making up stuff to get upset with.
06-11-2019, 06:52 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN

So you think that we would win exactly the same number of games?

Nah, I think he's saying that if we won a different number of games, it just wouldn't matter because they'd be running the lottery again and we could always luck out from a different position.
06-11-2019, 06:54 PM
Pelicanidae

BREAKING NEWS:

The New Orleans Pelicans have agreed to trade Anthony Davis and E’Twaun Moore to the Boston Celtics for Jayson Tatum, Marcus Smart, Jaylen Brown, and two future first round picks, per sources.
— ZIONOLA (@ReasonablePels) June 11, 2019

:hihi: :hihi:

This twitter account has 53 followers.

''per sources''.

Sounds legit.
06-11-2019, 06:55 PM
NMThreeMVP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

:rolleyes:

Have you ever heard of the concept of arguing in good faith? I have to ask, since you seem extremely determined to avoid doing it at all costs.

This is hilarious coming from the person that made this comment...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Trade AD in February, you don't get Zion.

Saying we wouldn’t have gotten Zion if we traded AD in February is literally unprovable and unknown.

By your same logic and the theories of time travel - you change one thing, you change everything.

If your point is that ultimately it doesn’t matter because we got Zion, I don’t disagree!
06-11-2019, 06:59 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

This is hilarious coming from the person that made this comment...

Saying we wouldn’t have gotten Zion if we traded AD in February is literally unprovable and unknown.

By your same logic and the theories of time travel - you change one thing, you change everything.

If your point is that ultimately it doesn’t matter because we got Zion, I don’t disagree!

Already accepted the fact that I phrased it poorly, and re-clarified. My point was that if you change anything you have to re-run the lottery again, and since the odds of us getting Zion the first time were so miniscule and we lucked out, the odds of us running it all over again and STILL getting Zion are so miniscule as to be considered, for practical purposes, pretty close to 0%.
06-11-2019, 07:10 PM
NMThreeMVP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Already accepted the fact that I phrased it poorly, and re-clarified. My point was that if you change anything you have to re-run the lottery again, and since the odds of us getting Zion the first time were so miniscule and we lucked out, the odds of us running it all over again and STILL getting Zion are so miniscule as to be considered, for practical purposes, pretty close to 0%.

Do you believe in God?

What about destiny?

What about Adam Silver?
06-11-2019, 07:12 PM
NMThreeMVP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

I'm saying those deals worked out pretty well in the long run.

I've never ''discounted'' the idea that Ball or Ingram could get better. We have had this argument dozens of times on this board. Every single time, whether it's with you, or 13-3, or GA25, or whichever bad-faith arguer decides not to bother actually reading what I've written before flipping their lids, I have to explain YET AGAIN that I totally understand that Ingram, or Ball, or Kuzma, or Josh Hart, or Moe flippin' Wagner, COULD end up improving in the future. In fact, MULTIPLE TIMES I have clarified that I expect certain improvements from certain players (I EXPECT Ingram to improve as a rebounder, for example).

I've also said that IF we were to end up with those players I would desperately hope that they prove me wrong and play well, because I want this team to be good, and I would be HAPPY to be wrong in those circumstances.

Please, please, I am begging you, argue with things I've actually said, or for approaches I've actually taken, rather than just making up stuff to get upset with.

At the time they were traded, did you think Buddy or Oladipo had a ceiling as a player, higher than Lonzo or Ingram have now?
06-11-2019, 07:12 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

Do you believe in God?

What about destiny?

What about Adam Silver?

Don't believe in God, don't really believe in destiny, don't think Silver rigged it.

I accept I could totally be wrong on that last one: maybe Silver did rig it. But I don't think so.
06-11-2019, 07:15 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

At the time they were traded, did you think Buddy or Oladipo had a ceiling as a player, higher than Lonzo or Ingram have now?

Buddy? I don't remember. I don't think I was super high on him, but I can't remember whether I thought he was going to settle and improve, or whether I thought he was just gonna stay being kinda meh.

Oladipo though, definitely. I totally believed that he had disappointed due to playing alongside Russ, who was on his triple-double-quest and didn't care about teammates or winning, and I argued that he was a much, MUCH better player than he was being given the chance to show. Then he went to Indiana, and it turns out I was right on that one.
06-11-2019, 07:30 PM
kinglio21093

Y'all see Brandon Ingram's Instagram story?
06-11-2019, 07:33 PM
Sleeper

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinglio21093

Y'all see Brandon Ingram's Instagram story?

Nah not everyone is on instagram. Do share though

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-11-2019, 07:35 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinglio21093

Y'all see Brandon Ingram's Instagram story?

Nope, what is it?
06-11-2019, 07:35 PM
kinglio21093

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sleeper

Nah not everyone is on instagram. Do share though

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I maybe grasping at straws but it's certainly interesting given the timing.

It's just a picture that says "U Don't Owe Anyone ****"
06-11-2019, 07:38 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinglio21093

I maybe grasping at straws but it's certainly interesting given the timing.

It's just a picture that says "U Don't Owe Anyone ****"

Could be relevant. Could also be unrelated, or it could be his commentary on the Durant thing (you don't owe anyone to play, look, Durant played when he wasn't healthy and now see what happened), but it's worth noting anyway.
06-11-2019, 07:39 PM
JJackisangry

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinglio21093

I maybe grasping at straws but it's certainly interesting given the timing.

It's just a picture that says "U Don't Owe Anyone ****"

Now this is the gossip I live for. Good work detective
06-11-2019, 07:41 PM
JJackisangry

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Could be relevant. Could also be unrelated, or it could be his commentary on the Durant thing (you don't owe anyone to play, look, Durant played when he wasn't healthy and now see what happened), but it's worth noting anyway.

Hilariously enough, I’d believe there could be something behind this before I’d believe in 99 percent of media speculation. I love when the social media detective squad is let loose
06-11-2019, 07:45 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJackisangry

Hilariously enough, I’d believe there could be something behind this before I’d believe in 99 percent of media speculation. I love when the social media detective squad is let loose

Remember, AD is still working out with Jrue and Frank Jackson.

AD to resign in NOLA?!?!?!?!???!!!
06-11-2019, 07:46 PM
JJackisangry

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Remember, AD is still working out with Jrue and Frank Jackson.

AD to resign in NOLA?!?!?!?!???!!!

YEESSSS MORREEE!!!!! I LIVE FOR THE PSYCHOANALYSIS
06-11-2019, 08:03 PM
NMThreeMVP

This should not come as a surprise. Very little enthusiasm around the league for Knicks' young prospects. https://t.co/eXSWWZyrW4
— Howard Beck (@HowardBeck) June 11, 2019

I can't believe Alonzo Trier's spacing isn't doing it for them :rolleyes:
06-11-2019, 08:07 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

This should not come as a surprise. Very little enthusiasm around the league for Knicks' young prospects. https://t.co/eXSWWZyrW4
— Howard Beck (@HowardBeck) June 11, 2019

Not surprising to anyone. We had the leaks from Woj that pretty much confirmed this when he said that Griff is asking other teams to get a third team involved to sweeten deals.

Knicks have promising young players in Robinson and Trier, but Knox, Ntilikina, and DSJ are not viewed highly around the league. If the Knicks want this deal, they'll have to try and flip Knox and Ntilikina into a decent player, or into a high value pick.
06-11-2019, 08:19 PM
Pelicanidae

Am I nuts for thinking that maybe Orlando could be a team to consider as a third party in the NYC deal?

They were pretty high on DSJ around draft time from all reports. They were linked to him multiple times earlier this season when he was being shopped by Dallas, and they still desperately need a lead guard (their current full time starting PG is DJ Augustin, who is 31, barely 6'0 tall, and is on the decline).

If that's true, maybe they could be roped in to provide the additional draft capital for an AD trade? Maybe re-rout DSJ and a future pick (possibly a Dallas pick) to Orlando in exchange for #16 and one of their young guys?

Maybe I'm just pipe-dreaming here, they probably wouldn't be that interested and I'm not sure why of the Magic young bigs I'd want. Mo Bamba? Jonathan Isaac?
06-11-2019, 08:38 PM
HornetGuru

The Knicks would have to trade DSJ, Knox and trier, for an all star, but who would that all star be? Would the wizards trade Beal for that? Then you draft Barrett and land Mitchell Robinson als, and get the Dallas pick next year

Wonder if we could get oladipo instead of Beal for that, love his defense

Jrue
Beal or oladipo
Barret
Zion
Robinson

Dallas pick next year
06-11-2019, 08:46 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by HornetGuru

The Knicks would have to trade DSJ, Knox and trier, for an all star, but who would that all star be? Would the wizards trade Beal for that? Then you draft Barrett and land Mitchell Robinson als, and get the Dallas pick next year

That's not necessarily true. Griff was fairly clear that the all-star would become less necessary if the depth of the supporting cast or the quality of the picks increased. Similarly, the quality of the picks becomes less important if there's a legit, full on all-star on the table.

The Knicks could pretty easily, I think, offer the deepest pick-based trade out of anyone. They could, if they wanted, offer their own picks in 2019, 2020, 2022, and the Dallas 2021 and 2023, without even having to make any moves. Only Boston could really come close to that, but they only have one pick from another team for future years (the Memphis 2020/2021 pick). They could also bolster the strength of their player core by packaging one or two of those picks with someone like Knox for another solid roleplayer, or a young player with high upside, while still maintaining probably the best set of picks.

In terms of players, Boston is the clear favourite there: Tatum and Brown are the two best prospects from any of the major teams, so the fact that they don't really have the best draft capital is less of a problem.

LA falls somewhere in the middle. Their players aren't as good as Boston's, but they're better than most of the Knicks guys (Ingram and Ball are better than Knox and Ntilikina, for example), but their array of picks is clearly inferior to New York's as well. So that's a kind of tricky position for them.
06-11-2019, 08:50 PM
NMThreeMVP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelicanidae

Not surprising to anyone. We had the leaks from Woj that pretty much confirmed this when he said that Griff is asking other teams to get a third team involved to sweeten deals.

Knicks have promising young players in Robinson and Trier, but Knox, Ntilikina, and DSJ are not viewed highly around the league. If the Knicks want this deal, they'll have to try and flip Knox and Ntilikina into a decent player, or into a high value pick.

How do we know Robinson and Trier have any value around the league? Both had somewhat serious off court red flags coming into the league. Robinson also fouls at a rate that would embarrass Ajinca.

The reason I wanted the Knicks deal back in February was about accumulating the draft pick with the highest probability of getting Zion. Now that we have Zion, I don't really see anything of value in the Knicks package unless you love RJ.
06-11-2019, 08:57 PM
Pelicanidae

Quote:

Originally Posted by NMThreeMVP

How do we know Robinson and Trier have any value around the league? Both had somewhat serious off court red flags coming into the league. Robinson also fouls at a rate that would embarrass Ajinca.

The reason I wanted the Knicks deal back in February was about accumulating the draft pick with the highest probability of getting Zion. Now that we have Zion, I don't really see anything of value in the Knicks package unless you love RJ.

I really find it kind of embarrassing when people bring up Robinson's foul rate as if that's somehow some huge point. He's a 20 year old big. He fouls. So do pretty much all of them.

Per 100, Mitchell Robinson averages 7.7 fouls.
In his rookie year, Draymond Green averaged 7.6 fouls per 100. Rudy Gobert, 6.9. DeAndre Jordan, 6.5.

Rookie Andrew Bynum fouled 8.7 times per 100. Rookie Mark Eaton, 7.5. Rookie Ben Wallace, 7.1.

Rookie bigs with defensive games foul a lot. It's fine.

About Trier? I don't know. I can imagine he'd have some value, since he was a double digit scorer who shot very well from 3, which is pretty much always something people are on the lookout for. Can't guarantee it though, haven't heard anything about him being sought after or about him being disliked.
06-11-2019, 09:07 PM
Mythrol

Quote:

Originally Posted by da ThRONe

Knicks were going to be trash with or without Davis and that's where we should have traded him.

This is beyond stupid.

You cannot sit here and still say we should have traded AD at deadline when by not trading him we won the lottery. No one can actually believe that.

Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM