Everything I'm reading shows that the franchise makes a nice profit. Where are you seeing that Gayle loses money owning the Pels?
Printable View
Everything I'm reading shows that the franchise makes a nice profit. Where are you seeing that Gayle loses money owning the Pels?
Three years? I’m in for $200.
I'm still hung up on the "operates at a loss" thing. From what I'm reading, the Pels have steadily been increasing revenue in the past 15 years.....from $95Mill in 07/08 all the way $224Mill in the 18/19 season. No way is this franchise losing money.
I don?t think they are operating at a loss (I don’t think I wrote that, I said that it wasn’t her greatest performing asset). I think the ROI is low. An increase in revenue is offset by deterioration of the dollar/increase in expenses. If your revenue jumps by $240M and your expenses jump by $240M you aren?t in a better spot.
Regardless, does anyone know if that trust that she put the Saints/Pels into is a revokable trust (or what type of trust it is)?
Yeah, I'm thinking that you're right. The NBA is so flush with tv money and now that there is a solid revenue sharing model, small market teams that DON'T pay a luxury tax, are pretty much guaranteed profit.
That being said, Covid changed things a bit. Everyone took a loss last year but the owners are getting the full 10% in player escrow money until it evens out to a 50/50 split over the course of the remaining years on this collective bargaining agreement.
For example, in a typical season, players put 10% of their salaries into an escrow account. When the season is over and both sides figure out how much revenue was generated, they figure out how much needs to go back to the players to create a 50/50 split so let's say the league generates $7 billion in revenue. After putting money in the escrow account, player intake comes to $3.3 billion. That is $200 million short of $3.5 billion which is half of $7 billion which would account for a 50/50 split. That $200 million then gets sent back to the players in form of checks.
Since Covid robbed arenas of fans last year, the owners collected the full 10% that they are allowed but even then, it still doesn't come to a 50/50 split so they'll roll it over and get the full 10% again this year. They'll keep doing the 10% thing until revenue split between players and owners since the beginning of the covid era reaches a 50/50 split.
In summation, unless Gayle starts getting really silly with the payroll, she will show a nice profit margin when the owners finally reach that 50/50 point sometime next season or the season after.
You called it a "losing investment (in a financial sense)" in one post and a "money pit" in a later one. You didn't just say it.....you doubled down. Lol
But even if it wasn't what you meant......I'm then not understanding your angle. The Pelicans are making a profit. They are a great return on investment AND that margin has more than doubled in 15 years......so why would the franchise being a great growing influence motivate Gayle to sell?
You all are talking about two different animals....
As a Profit Center, the team is probably performing poorly and operating at a loss. This means when you subtract the expenses in a given year from your revenue, the result is a loss. Uncle Sam doesn't like this.
As an Investment, the team is appreciating rapidly which makes it's a highly performing asset. The appreciation is considered unrealized gain on the books meaning that you don't recognize the gain for tax purposes until you liquidate the asset (sell the team). So unless you're hard up for cash, it behooves you to hold on to the asset and not share the appreciation with Uncle Sam unless you have losses from other investments to offet the gain.
The only way she keeps the team if she gets a new arena. Reading between the lines
https://www.fox8live.com/2021/10/01/...-will-be-sold/
Quote:
We?re gonna have to find a long-term solution and you know, we?re talking about different ideas now and we?ll see where we go,? he said.
Quote:
Lauscha said when it comes to both options, everything is on the table. But he knows whatever option there is, there needs to be a winning team to occupy that arena.
“You owe it to this market to put a winner on a court. We haven’t done that yet. Really this franchise has not done that. I mean, we’ve had some starts and stops over the entire course since the Hornets got here,” Lauscha said. “But we have not had a sustained winner like we’ve had with the New Orleans Saints.”
“I think before you can make any requests, you know, or make any long-term decisions about this franchise, you owe it to put a winning product on the court.”
“I think before you can make any requests, you know, or make any long-term decisions about this franchise, you owe it to put a winning product on the court.”
I also see this as meaning they really can't make a long-term decision about this market until they actually put a consistently winning product on the court. Its hard to say a franchise can't make it in NOLA if you don't give the people a product to support.
Look who got into real estate
https://www.nola.com/news/business/a...fb02d5f6f.html
https://www.bizneworleans.com/gayle-...porate-realty/
I'll assume the date of payment is 12/29/24 which is three years from when I accepted my portion of the bet.
Looks like we'll have NAW, Naji, and Jose back....might have BI and Hart (reported day to day) but JV will be out the next 5 days.
Happy New Year.
I again want to point out to everyone that NOLA has an elite group of people who pretend to be insiders.
NOLA does not have insiders.
New people can search back to any news event and note that our "insiders" were in the dark for everything.
OK, you can go back to the Shinn days with 42 and Harvey Hornet and find inside info, but ever since the Bensons took over, there has never been a move leaked by "insiders" before it happened.
The team is profitable so Gayle is not going to sell it. She's local so this team isn't moving. This is a well run organization that wants to win. Using absolutes about the future success of the franchise is just more confirmation that the lack of insider status has led to bitterness.
Mac is one of those dudes who won't believe in the check until it clears, let alone the promise of a check at some point. Pay that doom and gloom no mind. If he's wrong, then a good thing happens. But if he's right, then he gets to say I told you so. Deal with the fallout only after the bomb goes off.
Want to buy a new arena for a NBA team that stinks?
Wait till she finds out Zions price tag 18 months from now
New Orleans? Gayle Benson.
— David Fisher (@Fish_TBW) January 5, 2022
And yes. She's got plenty to go 'round. https://t.co/5iRKRoTHhE
Are we still doing this bet? We need to formalize this.
I'm still in.
The selling and relocation of an NBA franchise is nearing completion and no one knows anything about it but a poster on this board?
Could a team even pull a Cleveland Browns in 2022? Seems unlikely to the point of impossibility.
Cleveland Browns of 2022 could happen. They just have to keep it under wraps long enough so that the media doesn't start leaking info that could curtail the sale/relocation. I seriously doubt that's going on and want to believe Gayle but a Browns situation could happen.
What can NO LONGER happen is a Baltimore to Indianapolis of 1983 or either of the relocations to Los Angeles in the early 80's meaning the Raiders from Oakland to LA in '82 and the Clippers from San Diego to LA in '84. Both leagues tried to stop and even use legal maneuvering to keep the teams in their respective markets but didn't have the bylaws in place to stop them.
Since then, both the NFL and NBA have added bylaws and on top of that, have some of the strongest legal representation around so as a result, the relocation process goes through layers and layers before anything gets done.
So where'd the info come from and why are you so certain of it? Seems highly unlikely you're right, but I'll play along.
Assuming you're correct and this team will be sold in the next 3 years, why is no one talking about it except for your source who says it's all but a done deal? And if you trust this source and their word this much, why not name them and how they came about this info? If that was true, why would anyone sit on that info?
Just like MM's laughable claim that the entirety of Pels media knows about Zion's intention of signing the extension and then being traded shortly after, but they won't tell anyone for another year. What sports writer is gonna sit on that, if they know it to be true?
Both claims stink to me. Smells like manure.
Oh, I’m not dumb enough to get myself (and others) into hot water by divulging my information. Just know, the wheels are in motion.
The expected answer.
I love how nonspecific you are. There isn’t any “hey check out this potentially related thing” someone is doing elsewhere yiu can point out?
I don't place bets. Even when I know I'll win.
Smart call.
I’m no MM, and I don’t make claims like this (never have in the past). However this is more than just speculation. I’m just saying, when you are looking to buy Pels jerseys, expect for them to be vintage like those New Orleans Jazz jerseys you sometimes see within 3 years.
I call BS. A relocation of a sports franchise won’t get blown up because some no name that no one cares about (in the industry) posts their speculative “source” on a fan forum. This isn’t a reporter who does this full time and needs to keep returning to the well. Tell us everything or keep your mouth shut.
I've run into people who claim inside info on the Saints or specific players. I listen only so much. But for something like this, I'd need proof. I'd need them to be dead on accurate about many other things to buy a bombshell like this.
I have never claimed inside info in the past, nor do I make wagers unless ice cream is on the line (check my receipts on this site). I have nothing to gain by sharing this, and from a point of civic pride it sucks that it’s true.
Anyway, don’t catch long term feelings for this team.