I'd be a little annoyed if we passed on Oladipo.
I'd be a little annoyed if we passed on Oladipo.
One thing that I've noticed is that the game never got bigger than Otto Porter. Like he was always capable of producing and impacting the game. He wasn't a take the game over guy, but no matter what is required, he will be there.
I guess what I'm saying is that because he can score, defend, rebound, pass, and initiate offense, he almost never disappeared. He had a bad last game of the year, but those weren't all that common.
Exactly. And I am not comparing the two, but that is what made Jason Kidd so great throughout his career. If he couldn't score, he could still pass, defend, rebound, etc. There are so many ways to impact a game. People love scorers, but if they are off, then what do they give you? Take Ben McLemore, for instance. If he isn't hitting, what does he bring to the table? Maybe slightly above average rebounding for his position; maybe.
Give me the guy who can impact the game in the most ways and I know that he will give me something every night and on some nights he will give me everything.
Which is why I was and still am so gaga about Anthony Davis. If AD is having an off shooting night, he can still impact the game with his length, great hands, and quickness by getting last minute tip ins or deflections or that key rebound or block.
I'm definitely in agreement with these last few posts. Not sure what there is not to like with Porter. You would be talking about adding an EXTREMELY long SF next to an EXTREMELY long PF in Davis. Porter is the wing defender we have been desperate for. He also can handle the ball, and shoot the jumper, unlike another SF I know. He is definitely the type of guy that can give you 10+, 5 and 5, and just make your team so much better. It's also our weakest position, so it would allow us to focus our resources on other positions like PG and C where there are more viable options.
It would be a homerun, and he would be a fan favorite no doubt. The kid is a winner.
I would be really happy with Porter. He could start right away and for 10+ seasons.
I was never really wowed by Porter (and I guess that is what those above are saying). He seemed to fade towards the end of the season and disappeared in the tourney. I think he would be a good pick, but I am not as high on him as most.
if otto porter is there he will undoubtably be the pick, monty values his style AND wants length, porter is 6"9 with a 7"1 wingspan
if we somehow luck out and land otto porter who would yall want to sign for the PG position, jennings or teague?
I think Len is the bust of this draft and would rather take Muscala over this kid. He already has a injury that could potentially be a serious problem for a big man. I watched him disappear in a few games and if your that good you demand the ball on such a weak team. Not buying it that his guards didn't get him the ball. He was 7'1 playing against guys half his size and he still couldn't dominate. He has sky rocketed up boards because of Hibberts play. I have seen Mac state many times you don't need a dominant center to win and that is the truth. He reminds me of Lopez and i'd rather not have 2 of them.