Game Thread: Magic @ Hornets

You really don't get it. I'd be happy with Greivis if he was just a solid overall defender. But he isn't.

Nobody is looking for a top 5 or top 10 PG, I just want someone who won't hurt us.

Are you also itching to get rid of Anderson? He isn't very good on def either.

Outside of a few ill advised shots last night I don't see how GV has been hurting us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNO Gracias

Are you also itching to get rid of Anderson? He isn't very good on def either.

---

But he's also coming off the bench and provides far superior offense. Also, Anderson is way better than vasquez on defense. Sorry to burst your Vasquez love bubble.

And his issues of defense are now being compounded with him displaying the ability to chuck at the most inopportune times.


2nd or 3rd in assists, but prone to forget about passing for moments. Funny how that works.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eman5805

And his issues of defense are now being compounded with him displaying the ability to chuck at the most inopportune times.


2nd or 3rd in assists, but prone to forget about passing for moments. Funny how that works.

---

I agree, and I would even say that Eric Gordon's 5 assists added way more value to the team that Vasquez's 8 assits. Gordon was making some crazy good passes that Vasquez never sees or fails to execute.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eman5805

And his issues of defense are now being compounded with him displaying the ability to chuck at the most inopportune times.


2nd or 3rd in assists, but prone to forget about passing for moments. Funny how that works.

---

Even more so is how people who want to build around a sg that can't stay healthy, and shoots worse than a shot happy pg.

InnerGI. I am glad you aren't Monty...or the janitor.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNO Gracias

InnerGI. I am glad you aren't Monty...or the janitor.

---

I would like to know do you think Vasquez is this team future starting PG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicans_fan_504

I would like to know do you think Vasquez is this team future starting PG

---

Cause he's Venezuelan and from Maryland.

Vasquez's offensive rating is 105 compared to his defensive rating of 111. That shows his offense doesn't compensate for his lack of defense unlike Anderson who's offensive rating is 117 compared to his defensive rating of 111.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicans_fan_504

I would like to know do you think Vasquez is this team future starting PG

---

No. If the right deal came along I would move him. I am in favor of drafting Burke. If the right deal didn't come along I would hold on to him til he was off my books next year.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicans78

Cause he's Venezuelan and from Maryland.

---

What does any of that have to do with the price of tea in Chalmette?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicans78

Vasquez's offensive rating is 105 compared to his defensive rating of 111. That shows his offense doesn't compensate for his lack of defense unlike Anderson who's offensive rating is 117 compared to his defensive rating of 111.

---

But he averages alot of assists and points.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicans78

Vasquez's offensive rating is 105 compared to his defensive rating of 111. That shows his offense doesn't compensate for his lack of defense unlike Anderson who's offensive rating is 117 compared to his defensive rating of 111.

---

Where are you pulling these numbers from?

Basketball-Reference, I think hoopdata has them as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNO Gracias

No. If the right deal came along I would move him. I am in favor of drafting Burke. If the right deal didn't come along I would hold on to him til he was off my books next year.

---

Then what are you even trying to argue if you are ready to draft Burke? If you are willing to take a rookie with no experience over Vasquez, then you are saying Vasquez needs to go... like most in this thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pelicans78

Cause he's Venezuelan and from Maryland.

---

If this is true, it explains so much.....

No, I believe that Burke will be a top 5 pg from what he is showing now. That's why I would let GV go. I think you can throw Burke in there on day 1 and he will be an impact player from day 1 (unlike Rivers who many believe is our pg of the future).
Many here want GV gone for the sake of having him gone.

I am actually Cuban and a Michigan fan, but whatever this wouldn't be the first time you are wrong about something

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNO Gracias

No, I believe that Burke will be a top 5 pg from what he is showing now. That's why I would let GV go. I think you can throw Burke in there on day 1 and he will be an impact player from day 1 (unlike Rivers who many believe is our pg of the future).
Many here want GV gone for the sake of having him gone.

---

I want GV gone so we can have better play from the PG position. If that means Burke or trading for a PG, or signing Jennings.

I'm not in love with Assist totals. Like I said, I think Gordon's 5 assists last night were more valuable to the team.

Cool story. Lets throw rivers in there right now. He will probably perform leaps and bounds better than GV. I mean he has been doing so all season right?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNO Gracias

No, I believe that Burke will be a top 5 pg from what he is showing now. That's why I would let GV go. I think you can throw Burke in there on day 1 and he will be an impact player from day 1 (unlike Rivers who many believe is our pg of the future).
Many here want GV gone for the sake of having him gone.

---

I really don't think we'll be drafting Burke 4-6. If anything we get "stuck" with taking Smart if they want a PG and moving GV is in the plans.

I am fine with Smart. But if he doesn't pan out Lord help this board. The *****ing and moaning.

Block of the Night

This draft is SG deep