Although that makes sense, why is that predictable? We thought he would do that last offseason and he chose to anoint Evans as our SF.
Printable View
Can you see him being a Pel his whole career? I don't know.
How badly do we need to screw it up for that to happen? With AD in his prime how bad would the team around him have to be for us not to be at least the 4th or 5th seed? Unless Jrue's injury is truely chronic, which I will admit I am a little worried about, I just don't see it.
Back to the topic - Norris Cole.
It is easy to pick apart his shooting numbers, especially this year. But here's my point:
When you are bringing in a guy, you should focus on the numbers of the things he will be asked to do. He will be asked to play on-ball defense and be a facilitator. He excels in those two areas, either by eye test or numbers. He will effect 25-40 overall possessions per game when you combine both ends of the court. He might take 4 shots. If we use his scoring numbers as a gauge, then him going 2-4 would make him a god and 1-4 makes him a scrub.
Does that make sense to anyone? That is one shot, one possession over the course of an entire game. Or one out of his 40 possessions. Is that really the difference between him being a god or a scrub? Of course not.
If we were asking him to come in and be a scorer off the bench, his shooting numbers would scare me. But his streaky shooting worries me about as much as Drew Brees tackling form.
Must read piece on Cole's defense
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/th...cole-invasion/
How about we watch cole play a couple games for the pels before we judge him? A different scenery/role can do wonders for a player. Look at QPon for example, he barely got off the bench for memphis comes here plays big minutes and excels. I know stats and analytics say one thing, but a new system, better team, and different role on the team can change all of those stats. We have watched Jimmer so we know what he can do in a pels uniform.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So it sounds like out of the trade we are keeping Cole and Hamilton right?
Oops. Double post.
Will we see his Flat top tonight against Orlando ?
No... that's not at all what i said. The point was that Chalmers "started" on that squad, and played almost 30 minutes a game. MM made the case that Jimmer gets no significant back-up minutes at all on a Championship squad. Those are both very different things...
The hate on Jimmer on this board has gone too far - provoked by one major troll who was since banned. MM admitted as much on twitter yesterday that he unfairly dislike's Jimmer because of his fans (https://twitter.com/McNamara247/stat...21948311195649). Now I give him a break, because in his role, I bet he gets a lot of more that through twitter... but seriously.
But going back to the Heat, in 2012, Norris Cole played almost 20 minutes a game for them, shooting 39% (28% from 3), and 2 assists / .7 steals.
Not trying to argue who is better than who, just looking for some more explanation on MM's original point.
I think people here are worried about becoming the Kings (not me I know/see the direction we are going and loving it minus the injuries). The Kings has Cousins who has been putting up numbers and isn't a mega star but comes close to being a super star when he puts his mind and matures in the art of basketball. But we are in no way shape or form going to stay where we are like the Kings have for years. We have the right staff and fan base to skyrocket us into conference finals talks in 2 or 3 years. Great info you throw out on here man. Thanks for knowledgeable constructive input.
The Jimmer fans are annoying, but if he was playing well I wouldn't care. My evaluation of him as a player has nothing to do with his fans. They have to do with his play, which is not good and is clearly inferior to Cole when you consider all aspects of the game.
If you're a smart basketball fan you never, ever say no to a defensive upgrade at PG when all you have to give up is Salmons...
Wonderful.