-
I'm not quite Sura!
So obviously my mouth dropped when I first laid eyes on this mans contract. I did see some discussion about this being voided or forced to retire. I'm not sure if that is actually being considered, because I don't know the whole story behind why on earth the old owner would trade for him. Feel free to enlighten me. But either way I want to know if I'm stuck with that or if it may disappear.
-
The old Mavs owner was actually the same guy (or brother, who the heck knows) as the former Nuggets owner. He was purposely making the Mavs crappy and making beneficial deals for his Nuggets team. He was probably trying to cripple the Mavs team with bad contracts.
-
Yeah. It's obviously up to the Commish, and I know that he was trying to figure out what stuff to reverse, because those deals were horrendous.
-
I'm not quite Sura!
I suggested it, so you know where I stand.
-
Oh he comes up with clever titles... He's gonna fit right in lol
-
I support the reversal of Sura's contract
-
-
I'm not quite Sura!
-
I vote for voiding Sura's contract as well.
-
Just because it is one of the more ridiculous contracts, I support the void
-
I'm for removing the most blatantly cheap moves made by busta.
-
For Sura, get rid of it.
...I'll see myself out.
-
Yeah, that contract's insane. Trash it.
-
Good enough for me, it will be voided.
-
-
-
what happened with his contract?
-
I'm not quite Sura!