.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 10 of 66 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 20 60 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 250 of 1634

Thread: Pelicans to meet with Oden {EDIT-Oden chooses Miami,P.61}

  1. #226
    Da Weatherman Speaks! Contributor WeatherNLU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Chalmette, LA
    Posts
    859
    I have no idea how the cap works in the NBA but can we sign him and go over the cap or are we out of exemptions and exceptions? I think the latter is correct but just wondering. I don't think Benson would think twice about going over the cap or into luxury tax land but if we can't....we can't. They obviously have some plan in mind or they wouldn't waste their time.


    I survived Katrina, but nothing I owned did.

  2. #227
    Put it this way:

    Worst case scenerio: We sign Oden. Heck, we sign Oden for 2 years and guarantee him $$. Demps takes a "crazy" risk. He comes in, fails. We then rely on the same crew at center we were planning to anyway. Our crunch time lineup still involves the 5 money guys. It might cost us a win, maybe 2 or 3, but ultimately you're about at the same level you were.

    Best case scenario: Oden's given himself time to heal. He comes back and is 75-80% of what he was. Which was VERY good. You have one of the most feared frontcourt rotations in the NBA. Depending on how strong he returns, you may even build some championship equity. With Oden and Davis, you're dominating the boards and shutting down the lane.

    Why not roll the dice on scenario two? Again, the roster you've built basically calls upon Davis to play at center down the stretch anyway. Swing for a difference maker, and if you strike out, it's not going to significantly damage your outlook.

  3. #228
    Quote Originally Posted by MonsterMash View Post
    Put it this way:

    Worst case scenerio: We sign Oden. Heck, we sign Oden for 2 years and guarantee him $$. Demps takes a "crazy" risk. He comes in, fails. We then rely on the same crew at center we were planning to anyway. Our crunch time lineup still involves the 5 money guys. It might cost us a win, maybe 2 or 3, but ultimately you're about at the same level you were.

    Best case scenario: Oden's given himself time to heal. He comes back and is 75-80% of what he was. Which was VERY good. You have one of the most feared frontcourt rotations in the NBA. Depending on how strong he returns, you may even build some championship equity. With Oden and Davis, you're dominating the boards and shutting down the lane.

    Why not roll the dice on scenario two? Again, the roster you've built basically calls upon Davis to play at center down the stretch anyway. Swing for a difference maker, and if you strike out, it's not going to significantly damage your outlook.
    +1



  4. #229
    Marsh Mangler flyPelican's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    DULAC
    Posts
    109
    oden is the new version of bill walton. injuried alot but when healthy prototypical big man

  5. #230
    Make it happen Demps....and Loomis

  6. #231
    I just realized that they're bringing in Loomis for an obvious reason - they're gonna try to sell Oden on being the New Brees. Signed after career-threatening injury, becomes NFL legend.

  7. #232
    Quote Originally Posted by MonsterMash View Post
    I just realized that they're bringing in Loomis for an obvious reason - they're gonna try to sell Oden on being the New Brees. Signed after career-threatening injury, becomes NFL legend.
    Can I get an oooooooowwwwwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeee
    Follow me on Twitter: @WeAreSX2

  8. #233
    The more we research this, I think the best offer we can make is the league minimum. Don't see any other options. If he signs for that, great. But I am not getting my hopes up
    @mcnamara247

  9. #234
    Hall of Famer cgrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hammond, LA
    Posts
    785
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    The more we research this, I think the best offer we can make is the league minimum. Don't see any other options. If he signs for that, great. But I am not getting my hopes up
    is it confirmed that portland does indeed retain his rights?
    i agree with you that the "$3MM offer" as reported seems to ignore the reality of what the team can and cannot do

  10. #235
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    The more we research this, I think the best offer we can make is the league minimum. Don't see any other options. If he signs for that, great. But I am not getting my hopes up
    We don't know what deals Demps may or may not have lined up, though. If they actually are planning to offer 3 mil or so, they could easily have a trade in hand already, contingent on pieces falling into place.

  11. #236
    Band of Skulls & Neon Trees ramsters60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Westbank
    Posts
    3,412
    I admittedly have no idea what is going on, but I think its interesting if Loomis is actually there too....
    "we might make dollars, but we don't necessarily make sense"

    "always be sincere....whether you mean it or not"

  12. #237
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelMcNamara View Post
    The more we research this, I think the best offer we can make is the league minimum. Don't see any other options. If he signs for that, great. But I am not getting my hopes up
    We can always offer an endorsement deal for the Russian equivalent of Jimmy John's.

  13. #238
    Quote Originally Posted by MonsterMash View Post
    We don't know what deals Demps may or may not have lined up, though. If they actually are planning to offer 3 mil or so, they could easily have a trade in hand already, contingent on pieces falling into place.
    What's more likely, that Demps is ready to tear this team apart to create cap space for a guy that may never play again, or that this was a leak from an agent and the Pelicans have no intention of offering more than the minimum?

  14. #239
    Quote Originally Posted by BP225 View Post
    What's more likely, that Demps is ready to tear this team apart to create cap space for a guy that may never play again, or that this was a leak from an agent and the Pelicans have no intention of offering more than the minimum?
    He's not going to tear the team apart, but if it comes down to moving one of the role players to create 3 mil or so, I think it's certainly possible.

    And it very well might be agent-speak that's out there ... remember "Dell is going to BLOW THE KNICKS AWAY with his offer to Chris Copeland?" ... but I wouldn't rule out anything is all I'm saying. They might have a plan to offer as much as they need to. We might be last on Oden's list and getting used to drive up the price with teams he actually wants to go to. We won't know till it happens.

  15. #240
    Hall of Famer cgrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hammond, LA
    Posts
    785
    Quote Originally Posted by MonsterMash View Post
    He's not going to tear the team apart, but if it comes down to moving one of the role players to create 3 mil or so, I think it's certainly possible.
    all the role players who matter $$ wise have been moved, except one
    in this case, i would not give up jason smith for greg oden

  16. #241
    Benson is 86 so I seriously doubt he gives a damn about the luxury tax. Also in odens last season he averaged 18 points 13 rebounds and 4 blocks and he never relied on athleticism really he was just a hulk.

  17. #242
    Quote Originally Posted by cgrand View Post
    all the role players who matter $$ wise have been moved, except one
    in this case, i would not give up jason smith for greg oden
    I'm not saying you're wrong. Just that it would be an option, depending on how high they are on him.

  18. #243
    RT @Rotoworld_BK: Greg Oden's agent resumes talks with the Heat http://dlvr.it/3g8tXN
    This team aint wining nothing with this coach, we can make all the excuses we want. Unfortunately excuses don't win games.

  19. #244
    Btw those stats are per 36

  20. #245
    RIP BDJ AUSSIE_PELICAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    7,520
    Can we go over the lux to get Oden?
    I didn't think that was a possibility.

  21. #246
    Quote Originally Posted by MonsterMash View Post
    He's not going to tear the team apart, but if it comes down to moving one of the role players to create 3 mil or so, I think it's certainly possible.
    It'd be more than role players. Not being able to S&T with Portland is a huge deal because it means getting $3 million under the cap when the team is currently about $3 million above the cap. So they need to cut $6 million to sign. The least destructive option would be to cut Roberts/Miller/Thomas on top of finding someone to take Jason Smith. That's worth it if you had any degree of certainty that Oden was healthy, but if that were the case then Oden could probably get more than $3 million.

  22. #247
    Hall of Famer cgrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hammond, LA
    Posts
    785
    Quote Originally Posted by HornetGuru View Post
    Benson is 86 so I seriously doubt he gives a damn about the luxury tax. Also in odens last season he averaged 18 points 13 rebounds and 4 blocks and he never relied on athleticism really he was just a hulk.
    that's not how the salary cap works
    pelicans are over the cap, have no exceptions to use, and have no "rights" on oden that would allow an over-the-cap signing

  23. #248
    If he takes the minimum for 1 year, can they use the full MLE on him next year? So basically tell him (no illegal Boozer promises): "If things work out, you will play for three years, get about 1 mil for year one and 5-6 mil for years 2 and 3, then we will have your Bird rights to bring you back for silly money after that."??

  24. #249
    Quote Originally Posted by DefensiveMind View Post
    So the Pelicans are killing their bottom line, signing Oden to a one year deal? They are not leveraging themselves.
    Didn't say that..I was responding to your question. In our case, as referenced in the latter posts in this topic, the P's are over the limit. Would have to cut 1 2 or 3 players, and trade Jason Smith, in short, blow up the roster.
    As I have stated before, I have never been a fan of players of any sport, who when people refer to them they have to begin or end their sentences with
    "When/As long as they are healthy...." True...There are exceptions to this rule...However the fail to success rate is exponentially higher..Why spend any money on a player who , in any sport, over the course of 6 seasons played a total equivalent to 1 full season. Potential or not, it makes no sense to me.

    So again I say....No to G.O.

  25. #250
    Quote Originally Posted by NOSportsFan View Post
    Didn't say that..I was responding to your question. In our case, as referenced in the latter posts in this topic, the P's are over the limit. Would have to cut 1 2 or 3 players, and trade Jason Smith, in short, blow up the roster.
    As I have stated before, I have never been a fan of players of any sport, who when people refer to them they have to begin or end their sentences with
    "When/As long as they are healthy...." True...There are exceptions to this rule...However the fail to success rate is exponentially higher..Why spend any money on a player who , in any sport, over the course of 6 seasons played a total equivalent to 1 full season. Potential or not, it makes no sense to me.

    So again I say....No to G.O.
    Trading Jason Smith and renouncing guys like Darius Miller and Roberts, who to this point is probably our sixth guard, isn't "blowing up the roster." That's being a bit dramatic.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •