.
Pelicans Report
 
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 55

Thread: Chad Ford's new #5 mock draft

  1. #1

    Chad Ford's new #5 mock draft

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft...-mock-draft-50

    He still has us taking Alex Len at 6, which I really hope is the case if Porter, McLemore, or Oladipo is off the board. He says that he still has some doubts that McLemore will go in the top 5. He may end up being the player that drops like usual in every draft instead of Otto Porter. Will Dell take McLemore if he falls to sixth? I sure hope he would do it. Below is Ford's analysis of McLemore going to the Suns at 5.


    {Mod edit-Please do not post ESPN Insider articles}
    Last edited by RekesNotWeak; 06-18-2013 at 08:29 PM.

  2. #2
    IM WINNING B504ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Metairie
    Posts
    1,069
    The Pelicans did interview McLemore at draft combine, so I would say Dell has interest.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by B504ever View Post
    The Pelicans did interview McLemore at draft combine, so I would say Dell has interest.
    draft McLemore and get rid of Gordon

  4. #4
    ^^^ this guy.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by rebelman View Post
    draft McLemore and get rid of Gordon


    That would be most choice.
    If you Jimmer it, they will come.

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer ScoutWithoutClout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    521
    if it comes down to ben or len, there is no question we're getting ben

  7. #7
    The Voice of Reason Contributor RaisingTheBar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    13,223
    If we got McLemore, is it safe to say that Gordon is as good as gone?

  8. #8
    Aaron's All Metro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New Orleans 9th Ward
    Posts
    2,398
    Yes by trade deadline.
    SIGN A SF

  9. #9
    On a permanent Holiday! Purple Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Heart of the City
    Posts
    4,689
    No way Len gets to 6 now IMO.
    Wherehappens.

  10. #10
    The Voice of Reason Contributor RaisingTheBar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    13,223
    Quote Originally Posted by All Metro View Post
    Yes by trade deadline.
    So I would assume you would bring McLemore off the bench until then? Just trying to gauge how many people feel he can start day 1.

  11. #11
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,336
    Quote Originally Posted by RaisingTheBar View Post
    So I would assume you would bring McLemore off the bench until then? Just trying to gauge how many people feel he can start day 1.
    Depends on when Gordon gets hurt (sorry, it was too easy )

  12. #12
    The Voice of Reason Contributor RaisingTheBar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    13,223
    Quote Originally Posted by PELICANSFAN View Post
    Depends on when Gordon gets hurt (sorry, it was too easy )

  13. #13
    Hall of Famer Davisistheman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    688
    The more I watch Draft Express scouting videos on youtube, the more I want the Pels to grab Bennett at 6th if he's there. Even if it ment moving Davis to center and moving Anderson to SF or dealing him to get a true SF.

    What do you guys think about a Bennett, Anderson, Davis line up? and IMO Bennett could slide into the SF spot in some situations, I know people say he can't defend the SF, but I don't know, He's athletic and quick as hell.

    On a related note, most of the scouting videos I saw of Burke show him as a very "shoot 1st" PG. Granted, He's excellent at it, but is that what we want out of out PG? of do we want a distributor, who can score when he needs to?
    Last edited by Davisistheman; 06-19-2013 at 12:33 PM.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Davisistheman View Post
    The more I watch Draft Express scouting videos on youtube, the more I want the Pels to grab Bennett at 6th if he's there. Even if it ment moving Davis to center and moving Anderson to SF or dealing him to get a true SF.

    What do you guys think about a Bennett, Anderson, Davis line up? and IMO Bennett could slide into the SF spot in some situations, I know people say he can't defend the SF, but I don't know, He's athletic and quick as hell.

    On a related note, most of the scouting videos I saw of Burke show him as a very "shoot 1st" PG. Granted, He's excellent at it, but is that what we want out of out PG? of do we want a distributor, who can score when he needs to?
    We would have no good post defenders. Bennett would have to commit to that end and then hope he can do so well enough. Not to mention Anderson, Bennett, or Davis would have to guard some of the games best athletes out on the perimeter that scares me. IMO this makes us far too weak defensively with little upside offensively I don't like the trade off. If I'm drafting Bennett I'm trading Anderson.

  15. #15
    Hall of Famer Davisistheman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    688
    Quote Originally Posted by da ThRONe View Post
    We would have no good post defenders. Bennett would have to commit to that end and then hope he can do so well enough. Not to mention Anderson, Bennett, or Davis would have to guard some of the games best athletes out on the perimeter that scares me. IMO this makes us far too weak defensively with little upside offensively I don't like the trade off. If I'm drafting Bennett I'm trading Anderson.
    Just read a BleacherReoprt article that projected Tiago Splitter as a good fit for the Pels in free agnecy. If we did take Bennett and sign Splitter and taking your stand on trading Anderson we should be able to get a pretty solid return for Ryno to help us out on the perimeter. But Who might the be?

  16. #16
    Charter Member PELICANSFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Kenner, LA
    Posts
    23,336
    If I recall, he is restricted. I don't see Splitter leaving the Spurs anyway.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Davisistheman View Post
    Just read a BleacherReoprt article that projected Tiago Splitter as a good fit for the Pels in free agnecy. If we did take Bennett and sign Splitter and taking your stand on trading Anderson we should be able to get a pretty solid return for Ryno to help us out on the perimeter. But Who might the be?
    I wouldn't go the Splitter route. I'd look to play Davis and Bennett more as a college two power forward set as opposed to playing one at the 3.

  18. #18
    I think that the obvious choice is picking the best player that is available at the time, regardless of position. If Mclemore is still on the board at this sixth pick, we need to take him. If its Oladipo, we need to take him. If its Bennet or Porter or anyone who could fall, we need to take them. Lets build our talent base and then figure out everything else.

  19. #19
    IM WINNING B504ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Metairie
    Posts
    1,069
    Chad Ford saying that the Pelicans may prefer MCW over Burke.

  20. #20
    The Voice of Reason Contributor RaisingTheBar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    13,223
    Quote Originally Posted by B504ever View Post
    Chad Ford saying that the Pelicans may prefer MCW over Burke.
    Chad Ford needs to check himself.

  21. #21
    Hall of Famer neitzelbaby12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge
    Posts
    556
    Trade Gordon for Wilson Chandler, is that fair? Should they get more or should we?
    Welcome to be here

  22. #22
    IM WINNING B504ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Metairie
    Posts
    1,069
    Quote Originally Posted by RaisingTheBar View Post
    Chad Ford needs to check himself.
    Thats what he is saying he heard.

  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Davisistheman View Post
    The more I watch Draft Express scouting videos on youtube, the more I want the Pels to grab Bennett at 6th if he's there. Even if it ment moving Davis to center and moving Anderson to SF or dealing him to get a true SF.

    What do you guys think about a Bennett, Anderson, Davis line up? and IMO Bennett could slide into the SF spot in some situations, I know people say he can't defend the SF, but I don't know, He's athletic and quick as hell.

    On a related note, most of the scouting videos I saw of Burke show him as a very "shoot 1st" PG. Granted, He's excellent at it, but is that what we want out of out PG? of do we want a distributor, who can score when he needs to?
    I suggested this a while back on here. I'd like to draft Bennett and trade Ryno. Pretty sure we can get a good deal for Ryno. This kid has the most upside in this draft.imo.

  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by RaisingTheBar View Post
    Chad Ford needs to check himself.
    Been saying that as well. I wouldn't be upset at all. Have faith man.lol. If McW hadn't had a bad shooting season this wouldn't even be a problem what so ever. Love his length and athleticism. His vision is second to none. Turnovers and shooting are 2 things that are very much fixable.

  25. #25
    The Voice of Reason Contributor RaisingTheBar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    13,223
    Quote Originally Posted by B504ever View Post
    Thats what he is saying he heard.
    Maybe his source was MM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •