. |
I do agree that we don’t have the best assets and I normally wouldn’t even ask for Kawhi but he is putting the Spurs in a bad spot. Pretty much saying he wants out and only wants to go to the lakers isn’t helping his value. Any team trying to trade for him is taking a chance of prob only getting him a year. If not the Spurs lose him next year for nothing, that’s value in return. Not even trying to ask is just as bad. Reminds me models saying they never get asked out and end up with ugly guys. If you don’t ask it’ll never happen so don’t sell yourself short.
If you have AD leaving (although he's not passing up 46million a year) why don't you just trade AD for Kwahi RIGHT NOW. Put Kawhi on a Max deal. That way he's locked up for minimum of 4yrs. So, what you just put on the table is--> trade away 3 major rotational players & the future (2 1sters) KNOWING that AD is leaving in 1 1/2 .
I don't mean to Poke fun at you or anything, none of your logic makes any sense.
Let's just check that : https://hoopshype.com/2018/01/18/atl...fense-defense/
He ended 93th/99 (while Elfryd Payton ended 84th/99 but at least he was good before that) for DRPM at the end of the season so yeah ...
Last edited by Alvis; 07-07-2018 at 10:07 AM.
I don’t think we’re losing Davis anytime soon. There was a couple reasons I was trading away our bench. 1 is it’s hard to get a great player and I’d take a chance IF ITS POSSIBLE. The other is we clear cap space for next year so we can be active in FA. I’m banking on a good year and being able to get good FA but they won’t come for a discount.
It really gets under my skin how people on forums will destroy ideas of a trade because "it isn't a won for both teams" or it isn't logical when most of the trades in the NBA are lopsided and illogical. No matter how many examples pass them by, they just have to pee in other people's Wheaties.
Good positive energy.
But also, yo mama's fat.
Yeah, I dunno if any of it is worth getting under my skin or this peeing in Wheaties analogy, but I will agree- There aren't very many trades when both sides are throwing confetti in the air at the same time. It's all relative to a POV. Somebody, somewhere always thinks somebody got screwed .
Saw these two trade scenarios for Schroder. I think I would take that first deal, but I’m hoping Elfrid Payton will be the man. If we trade for anything we need a small forward not another point guard. If we were to make this move, I rather make it during the season, so we can see if we are better off with Payton. I thought Shroder was a decent defender, but I haven’t really seen the kid play. He may just be redundant by giving us the same type of player like Payton. That Hawk team was so bad that just about anyone halfway decent would put up decent numbers IMO. I think I would pass on him if he’s as bad as y’all make him out to be...
Hawks: Hill & 2nd round pick
Pels: Schroder
or
Hawks: Ajinca, Moore, and 2nd round pick
Pels: Schroder
Oh and that trade for Kawhi, the Lakers have WAY more to offer in Ball, Kuzma, or Ingram. I thought I saw that Kawhi wants to actually play for the Clippers. If we could jump in that as a 3 team deal to get Tobias Harris would be my wish lol.
Last edited by DaPelFromHell; 07-07-2018 at 04:33 PM.
Supply and demand. No matter how much Leonard kills his value he is still a top talent in this league, and he plays a premier position. Even if he tanked his value (like Paul George did in Indy) the team sending out the talent will demand something major to replace said talent. Oladipo was a rising player, Sabonis was coming off a rookie year, and they cleared a lot of money off their books. If you are thinking we are going to land Kawhi you need to be realistic with what it will take to get him, and outside of Jrue or AD we have no “rising talent” to give away, or any way for SA to get cap relief through our trade.
Last edited by UNO Gracias; 07-07-2018 at 05:53 PM.
If you Jimmer it, they will come.
It looks like the lakers are just going to wait till next year and just sign Kawhi meaning the spurs could be left with nothing. I know we don’t have the best option but if we’re the only option willing to give up some assets. Butler and Kemba don’t have that cloud over their head so i think it’ll be harder to get.
On second thought, if I can dump Solomon Hill to get a WAY better player on a deal that pays just 3 mil extra for the next 2 years. Then we on hold for 15.5 mil(i think) for one year with what may be a great expiring deal. But hopefully he balls out here and it’s a great deal.
I may throw in my first round pick & Hill for Shroder & Prince.
C: AD, Diallo, Ajinca
PF: Randle, Nico
SF: Prince, Miller, Blueitt(lolol)
SG: Jrue, Moore, Jackson
PG: Shroder, Payton, Clark(we shouldn’t signed him if we made that trade unless Frank isn’t good)
Like that depth chart if the Hawks would make that trade(if I have to I’ll give them a 2nd too lol)
Last edited by DaPelFromHell; 07-08-2018 at 06:11 PM.
If we trade a first round pick it better be protected. I’m not gonna get too confident about making playoffs. We barely made it last season. We need another point guard but a SF who rebounds well and plays defense and hits 3s would do wonders.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If we can find a way to move Hill/Ajinca for Dennis I'm all for it, but not Moore. Moore's value is as high as it ever probably will be, if we move him (which we honestly should) it should be for a wing.
We'd have the fastest PG tandem in the league; albeit both erratic.
When folks criticise players' defense i really dont get into it unless they're not capable physically of playing defense. Switching teams, coaches pushing the right buttons, maturing, having all-stars around you and most importantly playing for a contender can make players like elfrid payton and dennis pretty good damn defenders im sure
Pelicans should focus on rehabbing Solomon Hill’s value. He was an important part of a relatively stingy defense two seasons ago; a defense the Pels will probably be doubling down on this year.
Hopefully by the deadline an expiring contributor like Ariza or Simmons is available to be had for Hill and an asset. The Pels need to be players in FA next season. There most likely isn’t a realistic player out there that’s both under contract beyond next year and a real needle mover long term, so no sense in clogging the cap sheet further.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by DefensiveMind; 07-09-2018 at 09:59 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)