| . |
 |
I get the calculation, but to calculate the amount of shots you made above 53 (8) i.e. 800 divided by 53 doesn't compute based on a fix of 100 shots! By this method it would 106 shots to be perfect. It's not how many shots made more than 53,it's how many shots it took you to make 53!Originally Posted by DarkHornet
MM's right. People are struggling with the meta nature of doing percentages on percentages.
I'm not 100% sure I understand what you're saying, but what MM is saying is that in season 1:
53 made shots
100 shots taken
And then in season 2:
61 made shots
100 shots taken
That would be a roughly 15% year over year improvement.
Okay. We are wasting time on the math. Point is, there is a pretty significant difference. Isn't it possible it was the offensive scheme?
@mcnamara247
OK,I see. His base is the players actual % improvement based on his % the year before & not his actual improvement per 100 shots.. I got it !
Not wasting time, just a semantic issue. I Like Numbers. & I'm a bjg Asik guy. I hope he re-signs. No need for steam.
For reference... Asik in Houston
WHO IN THE HELL IS THAT ????? Good Gravy. Spin Move,half Hook, 10 ft.jumpers.
Heck, I wanted him back before the video. Geesh!
Last edited by Tinman; 06-02-2015 at 02:13 PM.
Highlight reels are often misleading given they are highlights and don't include the lowlights.
With that said I still contends Asik will look better, a lot better, if he is retained.
You don't even have to look at houston but also the Olympics or world fiba games. Asik clearly has more then he showed last season but j think it really was a case study of why Monty is gone. Even with the piece he so wanted he couldn't get it to all work.
DeMarre Carroll ? ? What's the chances of getting him with the limited room we have to maneuver?
WE saw the lowlights,so a highlight reel was AWESOME!
I still like Asik and think we will definitely keep him.
In that video, I count 2 or more guys within 3 feet of him just twice.
That is my point. I don't think he can go up strong if he has bodies around him, but in space he is fine
Didn't Asik deal with back issues for part of the year, as well? That would portend to why he struggled with mobility, at times.
During the regular season Asik was still a very valuable player for us. Postseason, not so much; he's also been better in both Houston and Chicago than he was this reg. season, as you alluded to. My biggest concern would be the way teams defended not only him at times, but other bigs in the postseason who had little offensive game. They get ignored and when that happens it clogs up everything.
He is flawed. I still say the same thing thought - Give me a realistic way we do better this summer given our cap.
Now, I concede the argument of just going cheap and then getting someone next year instead of having him on the books, but taking a step backwards this year is a non option IMO. Would have major consequences. You gotta go into next year with a solid center, and I don't see the alternative given our cap situation
In conjunction to this, Tyreke Evans and Omer Asik were the Pels 2nd most used two-man combo logging 1665 minutes. Reke was no.1 in getting blocked, Omer was no. 6. Mutually poor pairing due to injuries. If Jrue starts & Reke comes off the bench with Ryan, things are more spaced for everyone.
That has been Dell's plan for 2 years. Injuries have not allowed it sadly.
2nd most used two man combo? Geez, my pet peeve with them is how tight ball games slip away when they're fouledand can only be counted on to make one free throw out of two. Hell, I can stand that from Asik.
But from Tyreke.... who is handling the ball until he drives to the goal and draws foul after foul..... it's just not tolerable to me.
Tyreke= 58% FT in the post-season!!!
Asik= 57%
Sorry to derail thread. I'm sure other PG's do the same right??
Just for information, in a recent interview in France, Ajinca said he will chose a team that will offer him 20min per game on a consistent basis, so I don't see him sign back with us unless Ryno or Asik are gone.
Contributor
Wow that's unfortunate. I would like to resign him.
I do not want Asik, but I don't see anyone better with our cap situation. I just hope we can sign him cheap 7-9 mil range and use him during the season in a trade to help our C and SF situation. I don't want him on the books when the cap spikes in 2016. I think their will be a lot of better options in 2016.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would it even be that hard to convince him to take a one year deal? Hey Omer, the cap spikes next year and you'll want to be a free agent then.
Did you see the play where he stole the ball at the top and ran the fast break?! That's got to be a unicorn type scenario...
I actually like him on the roll and with slips and back door cuts, he's more mobile than I remember. He's no worse than Big Cat was that's for sure, and Big Cat was an allstar.
There is one important thing IMO.
Asik playin' not his best basketball might not cost us as much as Asik playin' good season.
Hopefully this will happen in this case.
With faster pace and space he has also nice mid range...
OK, just to clear all this up for those interested (and be thorny) , that is an 8% improvement in the overall metric as I stated before.
All you need to do to see the point is compare someone who made 53/100 shots one year to 61/105 shots the next. That is a 5% improvement in overall percentage but 15% in shots made (numerator).
Ok? Other than that I agree that Asik will be fine no matter the pace.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
