Originally Posted by
NMThreeMVP
Sorry, but I'm not willing to completely dismiss context when evaluating coaches. In the NBA, the origination and the players you're coaching are relevant considerations.
Folks dreaded Avery Johnson, yet the only coach to get to 100 wins faster than Avery is Thibs (by one game)! But in Avery's favor, he's coached a team to a finals appearance, something Thibs has yet to do, and Avery actually had a much higher win% as coach of the Mavs than Thibs has with Chicago.
Context clearly matters. Avery took over a 12-70 Nets team with little talent, doubled their wins, then had the lockout, then got fired 28 games into year 3 after a .500 start to the season.
I'm being somewhat facetious, but how do we know Thibs is any better than Avert Johnson? Or Scott Brooks.