So Thibs, who took his first year team to the Eastern Conference finals and then, despite losing Rose every season, has made the playoffs and never fell below 45 wins hasn't proven anything, but Monty gets a pass on that metric?
As for his backcourt success, he actually has a damn good track record. Has revitalized several careers, or at least got them to produce in his system effectively.
Not sure the Thibs hate. The only true knock people have on him are outside of his X's and O's and his system. Of which a lot is speculation. But probably a good bit of truth to it. What you are talking about is pretty hyperbolic and speculative.
For one where is this evidence that Monty doesnt have the ability to bench players?