Originally Posted by
Bongzilla
Ive seen you use this line of defense before, and lets just say apples and oranges.
Here is what you are clearly missing from this debate, it is not about what is said in the timeout, it is about the overall coaching throughout.
Pop doesn't have to say anything -----because he is a great coach, and does not need to rah-rah his team in the huddle. Much like how Phil Jackson would refuse to take a time-out when any other coach would. It is not about what is said in the timeout, it is about reminding players to do their jobs. It is about teaching and coaching your players so well, that sometimes saying nothing is more than enough.
Pop's system is taught and permanently ingrained in his players minds throughout the year.. When he says, "ive got nothing" it means - "ive got nothing to say that you haven't already heard before --you guys know what to do, we have been here before, calm down and focus on the basics of what I have taught you" He also has numerous championships, the respect of every human being in the basketball world, and frankly has earned the right to do and say what he wants.
Now, compare that to a coach, with no proven record, who has repeatedly made substitution errors, poor timeout selection, the worse in-bounds plays ever drawn up, one of the worst offensive systems in the league (who even knows what it is?), some form of super complex defensive scheme that is 1) clearly ineffective 2) way too difficult, and is regularly outcoached by his opponent.
He has no skins, zero. He does not have the luxury of saying and doing nothing, why you ask??????
BECAUSE HE IS NOT WINNING GAMES. How many 50 win seasons in a row does Pop have? Pretty strange and foolish to use him as an example.