Can't give the ball away against teams like the Rockets and Hawks.
 |
| . |
|
Can't give the ball away against teams like the Rockets and Hawks.
"I don't know if people know — I dislocated my pinkie finger. And [Tyreke] told me, 'You wanna go home or you wanna be here?' I want to be here. And he said, 'All right, then go tape it up and let's play. Let's go. We not stoppin' at no stores. Straight gas. That's what we do, just keep going.'"
http://thebasketbawlblog.com/
Kobe's on pace to win MVP in my opinion.Originally Posted by BallSoHard
Emeka Okafor - Joe Smith - Carmelo Anthony - Manu Ginobili - Jason Williams
Al Jefferson - James Posey - Aaron McKie - Shaun Livingston
Agreed. Offense and defense is crazy good
Marion > Jamison. Proof is in the pudding.
I'm still torn on this. You saying you think that the Dallas Mavericks are better without a superstar in Jamison? I hope that is the case. I need more than 5 games to prove that though. I think it's no doubt though that Marion may be a better fit. But my depth is completely gone now. 1 more injury and my season is over.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
You might have better balance with your offense but the scoring volume will be missed without Jamison.
See that is what I'm worried about as well. BUT, can the rest of the team pick up the slack with no problem? Biedrins performance seems to say they can. We will see.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Biedrins is a dam beast!!!!!
Dude, in those last five games he averaged about 26ppg and 15rpg and almost 5bpg! Simply ridiculous.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Jamison is a big time inside scorer but that's all he does. Marion is a better shooter, defender, and rebounder. He doesn't score as well as Jamison overall but he does everything else better. He's higher on the index as well meaning the computer thinks he's better overall. I think your team is more balanced with Marion starting. Your team clearly did better with Marion starting. Now maybe Jamison would help the team more at PF, but Bass played well in his supporting role.
You have 4 guys who can put up points at any given time so Jamison's scoring won't be missed. The only thing that hurts is depth, but you can acquire depth from some crafty trades.
Wilcox starting:
Wilcox - 32.0 M, 12.6 P, 7.7 R, 41.1%
Ilyasova - 16.25 M, 5.0 P, 4.5 R, 38.1%
Ilyasova starting:
Ilyasova - 32.6 M, 8.75 P, 10.88 R, 37.7%
Wilcox - 24.56 M, 10.94 P, 6.06 R, 45.3%
Thoughts?
This a trick question? Seems pretty obvious the production is better all around from both guys when Killya is starting. What advantages do you see when Wilcox starts?
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
6-4 with some dominant victories when Wilcox started
9-7 when Illy starts
Wilcox gives you more offense but Ilyasova does more defense and rebounding plus doesn't turn the ball over as much. Wilcox probably takes shots away from Martin and Yao in the starting lineup. Personally I would use Wilcox in his 6th man role and start Ilya to let him defense and rebound while letting Martin, Yao, and Ridnour take care of the scoring while Wilcox brings offense off the bench.
Yeah, I'm a few steps ahead of you already. Wilcox is going back to back-up PF/C.
Jason Smith and Drew Gooden have been pleasant surprises towards the back end of my bench.
I'd start sova but would try to have both if them average around 28 minutes a game
What's your pace and trap/press?
Slow and Normal/Normal
I've learned that trap and press seem to be different. I look at press as a full-court option and trapping as a half-court option.
I've been pleased with my defensive production so far. Probably not gonna change that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
