Dd you read this?
"As described in question number 79, a team below the cap may disregard salaries when making trades, as long as the team finishes no more than $100,000 above the cap as the result of a trade. However, a team below the cap can choose to use the trade rules for teams above the cap if it works to the team's advantage. For example, if a team is $1 million below the cap, then by using the trade rules for teams below the cap it can trade an $8 million player for a player making up to $9.1 million. By using the rules in place for teams above the cap, the team could trade the $8 million player for a player making up to $12.1 million."
By the way, I just want to state that I have nothing to do with the annoying Suns troll. Im going to ignore him. I'm just trying to get at the truth.
As described in question number 79, exceptions are the mechanisms that allow teams to sign players or make trades that leave them above the salary cap. Any trade which leaves the team over the salary cap requires an exception -- even if the team is moving downward in salary. For example, if the salary cap is $60 million, a team has a team salary of $65 million, and they want to trade a $5 million player for a $4 million player, they still have to use an exception. Even though their team salary is decreasing by $1 million as a result of the trade, the fact that they would finish over the salary cap ($64 million) means that an exception is required.
"Any trade which leaves the team over the salary cap requires an exception"
So where is our exception? Going under the cap wiped out any we may have had, and we haven't created one.
So what's the damage if we can? The idiot still has proven nothing. We get Lopez cheap or he's wrong about the deal.
Which is it? Dude isn't getting $7m or whatever.
"Aime la vérité, mais pardonne à l'erreur." - François-Marie Arouet (Voltaire)
Everyone gets their lessons, and I'm fine getting mine.
What this other guy is doing is not helping anyone, so he's getting the fun treatment.
between this thread and the black hole show Im watching on SCI channel, my heads really spinning.
We had quite a few interesting conversations as we pondered and navigated the nightly canopy.
Well, I don't care about that dumb troll.
But even if you forget the FAQ which I think clearly states we can take back 150% from the passage I quoted, it doesn't even make logical sense that teams under the cap would be penalized in this way and put to a disadvantage with teams over the cap. Teams under the cap should have more advantages, not less. Yes, they do lose the mid-level exceptions and such, but that is all different from a traded player exception.
We need a 4th big - so I think it's not a terrible move to take Lopez......but he is NOT starter material. He's regressed greatly in the past 2 seasons and lost a lot of athleticism from an injury a few seasons back. I'm not sure why people are considering him our answer at starting C.
As a 4th big - he'll probably provide us some hard fouls and a little bit of bulk inside. He has not been an effective player at all since 09-10. Unless he reverts back to his old form, we're getting 6 hard fouls off the bench and not much more. It's not the end of the world to have him come off the bench, but I think many people on this thread are making him out to be a more effective player than he is.
You guys are killing me!
My wife is from Arizona, Phoenix is a good city;
I am from New Orleans, Good City!
Hornets have never been an ideal franchise;
Suns have never been an ideal franchise!
Gordon is a tool and played both franchises for his money! Hooray!
Lopez is big.
None of us completely understand every aspect of the NBA salary cap and trade rules! (Need a Law degree I think, or at least be a CPA}
Now can we just talk about basketball and stop with the insults!
It's that the Hornets unashamedly quit so quickly in Game 4 after fans in New Orleans showed up this season with greater regularity than the team could have ever dreamed, shaming misinformed know-it-alls like me who kept telling you that local residents couldn't possibly invest their time and money into something as trivial as rooting for the local basketball team while still recovering from the devastation of Hurricane Katrina. - Mark Stien ESPN
The FAQ has been wrong before, and Coon makes errors too. He didn't have the max salary right for this season. He found out when trying to figure out the Asik deal. The numbers he got on for the high end of the deal were lower than reported, then he sorted it out and updated the FAQ.
If I'm reading it wrong, fine. I've got a clear, logical, data-based argument that could be wrong. So be it. I'm not just making stuff up and repeating trash like Suns-boy.
No problem with that sort of defeat.
Plus, he still can't subtract. If all this stuff is true, he didn't start there. He's just flopping around saying anything, changing his tune once it doesn't fit.
Im off to bed. Hopefully this trade will be done in the morning and we won't have wasted our brains for nothing.
Plus, there are vagaries:
So being under the cap does not necessarily mean a team has room to sign free agents. For example, assume the cap is $58 million, and a team has $51.5 million committed to salaries. They also have a Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level exception for $5 million and a trade exception for $5.5 million. Even though their salaries put them $6.5 million under the cap, their exceptions also count toward their team salary, increasing their total to $62 million, or $4 million over the cap. So the team actually has no cap room to sign free agents, and instead must use its exceptions to sign players.
So there are at least two different ways to be under the cap: with exceptions and without.
To me, the Anderson trade means we have no exceptions other than the room exception and vet mins (inalienable). I make sense of the totality of what you have posted and what I have posted is that teams under the cap but within `exceptions' of being over and then use those rules if they want. Once you give up the exceptions, you can't.
In my reading, we are in the latter category, and the Anderson trade is evidence.
ETA: More from the same Question:
A team's exceptions may be lost entirely, or the team may never receive them to begin with. This happens when their team salary is so low that when the exceptions are added to the team salary, the sum is still below the salary cap. If this happens when the exceptions arise, then the team doesn't get their exceptions at all. If the team salary ever drops below this level during the year, then any unused portions of their exceptions are lost (and do not return if the team salary increases).
For example, assume there is a $58 million salary cap, and during the offseason a team has $50 million committed to salaries, along with a Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level exception for $5 million, a trade exception for $2.5 million, and an unrenounced free agent whose free agent amount is $2 million. Their salaries and exceptions total $59.5 million, or $1.5 million over the cap. What if their free agent signs with another team? The $2 million free agent amount comes off their cap, so their team salary (including their remaining exceptions) drops to $57.5 million. This total is below the cap so the team loses its Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level and trade exceptions.
There is logic behind this. The whole idea behind an "exception" is that it is an exception to the rule which says a team cannot go over the salary cap. In other words, an exception is a mechanism which allows a team to function above the cap. If a team isn't over the cap, then the concept of an exception is moot. Therefore, if a team's team salary ever drops this far, its exceptions go away. A rule of thumb is that a team may have either exceptions or cap room, but it can't have both at the same time. However, a team in this situation does qualify to use the Room Mid-Level exception (see question number 25).
Last edited by 42; 07-25-2012 at 12:51 AM.
Why do they test you 42? Why?
Forget the mid-level exception, the biannual exception, the player exceptions you get for making uneven trades. This is just confusing you.
Think of the "traded player exception" as the transaction created when you swipe your credit card. Every single time a team over the cap trades a player, a "traded player exception" is the means by which it happens. It is created by doing the trade, you don't need one to do the trade. It is just a set of restrictions you must abide by if you are over the cap, it is the rules of the transaction. And that paragraph I mentioned says that a team under the cap can use these over the cap exceptions if it is useful to them.
That's how I see it anyway from the FAQ.
Last edited by sfernald; 07-25-2012 at 01:04 AM.
They should. No one should just believe me. No one should just believe anyone. Respectually listen, fact check when you can. Not everyone can all the time, but the better educated we are as fans, the better off we'll be.
We're the smallest market in the NBA, so we're going to get junk thrown at us. We can't be average. We have to be great fans. We have to be hospitable, fun, passionate, and educated.
We should be testing each other the right way pretty often.
They should test like sfernald. Dude had me working and was 100% cool. I do appreciate having to work and any learning that may come as a result, right or wrong on my part. This other guy . . . ugh.
Am I the only one who is shocked that X isn't involved in this trade?
Also, am I the only one that read that Miller would be shipped out, got bummed, and then realized that it was Brad Miller not Darius?
"Hornets means nothing." - Tom Benson
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)