having spent quite a bit of time in both cities, i can assure you, atlanta is much more like charlotte than new orleans.
i find it odd that people who couldn't keep a team for more than 14 years feel the need to tell us our long-term chances of keeping a team.
charlotte is "better?" what kind of crap is that? do banks determine who is "better?"
i guess being a big, uninteresting, sprawled-out blob (like atlanta) doesn't mean anything in this comparison, huh?