2001 Draft File

http://www.hrfbb.net63.net/

Season > Draft Preview

Keep all discussion on the file in this thread. Feel free to discuss if ratings are to high or to low for a certain player. But keep in mind this is for the players as a rookie.

SCALABRINE FOR #1 PICK!!! Will there be a draft lottery or will it go football-style by records?

Is it based on their actual NBA career? Or based on what their skills were coming out of College/Europe.

when i click on a player name in the draft preview it brings up a completely different player page.

i.e. if i click on Earl Watson it brings up a player page for Parker Beardslee

I have some issues with some of these guys. For example: Coming out of college R Jeff was considered a defensive guru. I think tyson and curry were considered the higher potentialed guys and Gilbert Arenas was not considered as good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PrepP

when i click on a player name in the draft preview it brings up a completely different player page.

i.e. if i click on Earl Watson it brings up a player page for Parker Beardslee

---

That's just the created player, I just uploaded the draft file not the player files.

And KY, I'd say just go by the players grades.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CP3forMVP

That's just the created player, I just uploaded the draft file not the player files.

And KY, I'd say just go by the players grades.

---

That's what I'm asking...where are the grades coming from? Kind of based on their NBA career or what they were projected to be heading into the draft.

Little bit of both I'd say.

Like Kwame for example, doesn't have horrible ratings, but also doesn't have the ratings of a guy that was a #1 overall pick.

Well that's good, because I've always thought the way that draft was portrayed was that he wasn't supposed to be number 1. I actually like the way you have it set up, where guys that ended up doing better, like arenas have really high potential, where kwame has F potential. I feel like that should be a general rule for our future drafts. Like even failed draft picks should have higher ratings but crappy potential

Just uploaded the player pages.

Would be fun if potential was hidden

meh... I'm sure for the most part, people would go with who they've actually heard of or are still around which basically equals high potential so wouldn't really matter I think

Im with Mr. Hard Balls here, potential should be hidden and not just for the draft, but for the other players too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by janjanjanjan3

Im with Mr. Hard Balls here, potential should be hidden and not just for the draft, but for the other players too.

---

I'm going to take that as a compliment, esp if it wasnt meant that way :hihi:

On a serious not, the points you earn should be able to buy you a scouting report for like 5 player or something.

Age should be the only clue for potential, and how can a 36 year old Chuck Person get a B potential? (Not complaining, Im just sayin)

The scouting for those earned points sounds cool too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by janjanjanjan3

The scouting for those earned points sounds cool too.

---

Sounds like more work for the commish lol