Jack, Okafor & #10 pick for Brandon Jennings
We have got to start getting more realistic with these trades.
It is going to take a lot to get a player of his caliber.
Thoughts?
Hornets/Bucks Trade
Printable View
-
06-14-2012, 03:06 PMjborobuzzHornets/Bucks Trade
-
06-14-2012, 03:11 PMFlyGirlA player of whose caliber? Jennings?Quote:
Originally Posted by jborobuzz
-
06-14-2012, 03:11 PMAD23forMVPAre we starting with the next trade then? lolQuote:
Originally Posted by jborobuzz
You're missing about 17M of salary from the Bucks side to make that deal work. -
06-14-2012, 03:12 PMAD23forMVP
It would have to be something like:
Jarrett Jack
#10 pick
for
Brandon Jennings
Shaun Livingston -
06-14-2012, 03:12 PMrebelman
pass, Jennings has made it clear he wants to go to a bigger market
-
06-14-2012, 03:13 PMFlyGirl
Marc Stein @ESPNSteinLine
Draft buzz: Hearing that teams calling Hornets being told that it'll take more to get No. 10 pick than taking on Ariza or Okafor contract -
06-14-2012, 03:15 PMAD23forMVPIf Davis develops into the player we think he will be, if Gordon stays healthy, and if Jennings likes Monty and company like other guys do, I think he would be open to sticking in the Big Easy.Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelman
-
06-14-2012, 03:18 PMUnknown PosterMy thought is the more realistic thing to happen is there won't be any trades.Quote:
Originally Posted by jborobuzz
-
06-14-2012, 03:18 PMtyler
The dude is nice didn't he like 50+ points one game his rookie year
-
06-14-2012, 03:19 PMIVAN_NOH
I would sign jennings, I like him as a young player, if the offer is good... why not.
-
06-14-2012, 03:23 PMFlyGirl
Brandon Jennings is a chucking bum. :hihi: Not to mention he's likely to give up more points than he gives.
-
06-14-2012, 03:31 PMtyler
If he had a better team i'm sure his assist # would be up and the dude nearly avg 2 steals a game
-
06-14-2012, 03:33 PMRaisingTheBar
hell no. the keyword being HELL, and NO.
-
06-14-2012, 03:36 PMFlyGirl
Giving up all that for Brandon Jennings and the #10 pick himself will probably be better than Jennings. I don't know that for certain though but it sure as heck wouldn't surprise me.
-
06-14-2012, 04:33 PMjborobuzzThen what was the deal Dell was trying to do this past year when he was trying hard to get Jennings?Quote:
Originally Posted by CP3forMVP
-
06-14-2012, 04:48 PMSilverfoxx
Seriously, we are trading a potential great player for this guy?
http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/1064419_o.gif
Ill pass. Rivers FTW. -
06-14-2012, 05:10 PMTBlaze
I'll take that trade in a heartbeat... Jennings has been playing w/ scrubs up there in Milwaukee. He was good when Bogut wasn't hurt.
Put him here w/ Davis and Gordon and watch... the dude is a great scoring PG who can dish too. He'd be amazing in NOLA. -
06-14-2012, 05:12 PMthefuture
Anyone remember what the suggested deal for Jennings was?
-
06-14-2012, 05:14 PMTBlaze
I think it originally started w/ #10 and Ariza for Jennings... but I'm pretty sure there needs to be more involved.
I know the Bucks might actually prefer Oakfor unless they plan on drafting Leonard/Henson/Zeller at 12.
I'd do Ariza, Jack, and #10 for Jennings and a filler. Have to check Milwaukee's roster first. Mbah A Moute still there? ha -
06-14-2012, 05:16 PMthefutureI thought there were rumours of us trading for him during the season?Quote:
Originally Posted by TBlaze
-
06-14-2012, 05:18 PMTBlaze
Ohhhh... yeah... that original.
I think it had something to do some combination of Mek/Kaman, Jack, and Landry with him coming back with another bad contract. -
06-14-2012, 05:26 PMTrell
Rather Austin Rivers!
-
06-14-2012, 05:30 PMAD23forMVPYeah, Carl was definitely involved. That's the guy they liked the most if I remember correctly.Quote:
Originally Posted by TBlaze
I know you can't trade a player under contract in one of those sign and trade deals, but could you do the rights to a player? -
06-14-2012, 05:50 PMPurple Haze
I would much rather draft Lillard or Rivers.