BUT......that's not the SPURS' way.
Kawhi Leonard is reportedly unwilling to take less than a max extension. He’s right. http://t.co/AT4EvCYV92 pic.twitter.com/LT9WGeiuVf
— SB Nation NBA (@SBNationNBA) October 27, 2014
Printable View
BUT......that's not the SPURS' way.
Kawhi Leonard is reportedly unwilling to take less than a max extension. He’s right. http://t.co/AT4EvCYV92 pic.twitter.com/LT9WGeiuVf
— SB Nation NBA (@SBNationNBA) October 27, 2014
Done. Make it happen Dell lol
Parsons and Hayward got a max. In what world is Leonard not going to? Spurs will pay him. Don't get hopes up.
Indeed. Kahwai is trying to get his.
Duncan got his back in the day.
BUT........
What if Spurs end up with a Lance Stephenson dilemma?
(edit)
I'm not saying WE could get him. But if he could be had from SAS, things would be very interesting in our division.
According to some here, Leonard isn't a max guy. Maybe those posters work in the SA front office.
San Antonio will give him the max if they have to no question, he's not going anywhere
I think the Spurs have gotten a little spoiled with their big 3 all taking less than market value. But all this guys got their money first. Leonard is the future for them and they should give him a max with little delay as to avoid any potential ill feelings long term.
With what Parsons and Hayward got I don't blame him
Sent from my Galaxy Note 4
Look, Why-Why (as Timmy D calls him, lol) will get paid.. but I have two questions here. Is this a case of the Spurs trying to get "cute"? Relying on their track record and saying, "what the hell, lets see what he says?" or is this a peak behind the curtain on Leonard? I tend to think its the former, but why risk playing with something that ain't broke?
If he's a rfa i don't see many problems...someone will undoubtedly offer him the max if he hasn't signed for the spurs yet